Corporate Renewable Energy Buyers’ Principles Highlight the Promise of Consumer/Utility Collaboration

Jul 24, 2014

Reading Time : 3 min

In an effort to address these challenges, 12 major U.S. companies, including Facebook, Walmart, Johnson & Johnson, Intel, Mars and General Motors, with the help of the World Resources Institute and the World Wildlife Fund, recently developed and published a set of Corporate Renewable Energy Buyers’ Principles (Principles). If successfully implemented, the Principles could substantially improve the relationships between large consumers and utilities, increase the availability of cost-competitive renewable power products and options, and reduce market complexity and transaction costs.3 The Principles, which are designed to, among other things, encourage collaboration between large-scale corporate energy consumers, utilities and power suppliers, incentivize utilities and suppliers to offer more cost-competitive renewable energy products to meet diverse customer needs, and maximize the complementary business, environmental and social benefits of renewable power production, set forth six principal needs and expectations:

  1. increased choice in options to procure renewable power to meet business goals and customer requirements;
  2. cost-competitiveness of renewable vs. “traditional” power, including pricing reflective of the comprehensive costs and benefits to the power system of renewable power;
  3. fixed-price renewable power purchase contracts with varying durational options to increase price certainty and avoid price volatility;
  4. better access to products and options that promote renewable power project development and actually reduce overall emissions, including bundled renewable energy/Renewable Energy Credit (REC) products, prevent “double counting” of REC-related environmental benefits, and enhance local economies and communities and grid resilience and security;
  5. better access to third-party financing and power purchase agreements and streamlined, simplified contracting and project financing processes;
  6. more opportunities to work with utilities, suppliers, and regulators to design and develop innovative renewable energy products and purchase options that fairly allocate costs and benefits and can be deployed for existing as well as new end-user load.4

The Principles offer a wide range of potential benefits to corporate energy consumers and the utilities and suppliers that serve them:

First, the Principles show that significant, large-scale corporate consumers are interested in working with utilities to meet their renewable energy needs.

Second, to the extent that implementation of the Principles further strengthens the business case for large commercial and industrial customers to purchase more renewable power, other similar large-scale consumers might become more likely to pursue similar options. As market participation grows, so should customers’ ability to influence the products and options that are available.

Third, successful implementation of the Principles, by increasing the likelihood that large-scale corporate consumers will work with their utilities, rather than around them, to procure more renewable power, should benefit utilities, suppliers and consumers alike as all involved can reap significant benefits from streamlined processes and reduced transaction times and costs.

Finally, a streamlined market that facilitates large-scale consumers’ purchases of more renewable power should enable more companies to commit to and successfully achieve clean energy goals faster and at lower cost, producing a competitive advantage and possibly increasing overall revenue. The potential benefits of this positive feedback loop are immense.

Whether these Principles will be effective in encouraging utilities to make available or facilitate the products and options requested by the initial signatories to the Principles remains to be seen. In any event, competitors of and companies like the initial signatories may wish to take notice of the Principles and consider the potential benefits of actively supporting them or pursuing similar market changes with their own utilities.


1 Julia E. Sullivan et al., Why End Users Are Investing (Big) in Distributed Generation, 27:2 Elec. J. 23-32 (2014). 

2 Joshua Ryor, Tackling U.S. Corporations’ 3 Challenges to Buying Renewable Energy, World Res. Inst. Blog (July 11, 2014), http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/07/tackling-us-corporations%E2%80%99-3-challenges-buying-renewable-energy.

3 Corporate Renewable Energy Buyers’ Principles: Increasing Access to Renewable Energy (July 2014), http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/Corporate_Renewable_Energy_Buyers
_Principles.pdf
.

4 Id.  See also Press Release, World Res. Inst., Major U.S. Companies:  Unmet Renewable Energy Demand Requires Market Shift (July 10, 2014), http://www.wri.org/news/2014/07/major-us-companies-unmet-renewable-energy-demand-
requires-market-shift.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

August 07, 2024

*Thank you to JaKell Larson, 2024 Akin Summer Associate, for her valuable collaboration on this article.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 31, 2024

Interstate oil, liquid and refined products pipelines regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) will soon be able to raise their transportation rates (provided they were set using FERC’s popular Index rate methodology) in the wake of a significant new decision by the District of Columbia Circuit (the D.C. Circuit) in Liquid Energy Pipeline Association v. FERC (LEPA).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 29, 2024

On Wednesday, July 24, 2024, the U.S. House of Representative Committee on Energy and Commerce held a Subcommittee on Energy, Climate, and Grid Security hearing to review the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request. Members of the Subcommittee had the opportunity to hear testimony from all five Commissioners, including FERC Chairman Willie Phillips and Commissioner Mark Christie, as well as the three recently confirmed commissioners, David Rosner, Lindsay See and Judy Chang. In addition to their prepared remarks, the five commissioners answered questions on FERC’s mandate to provide affordable and reliable electricity and natural gas services nationwide, while also ensuring it fulfills its primary mission of maintaining just and reasonable rates.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 29, 2024

On July 9, 2024, the U.S. Court of the Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) erred in ordering refunds for certain bilateral spot market transactions in the Western Energy Coordinating Council (WECC) region that exceeded the $1,000/megawatt-hour (MWh) “soft” price cap for such sales.1 Finding FERC failed to conduct a “Mobile-Sierra public-interest analysis” before “altering” those contracts by ordering refunds, the court vacated FERC’s orders and remanded the case to FERC for further proceedings.2

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 8, 2024

On June 28, 2024, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., which for 40 years required court deference to reasonable agency interpretations of federal statutes in certain circumstances, even when the reviewing court would read the statute differently. The Court ended “Chevron deference” and held that courts “must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority.” In doing so, the Court upended a longstanding principle of administrative law that is likely to make agency decisions more susceptible to challenge in the courts.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 3, 2024

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin and ICF’s recently presented “Powering Progress: Decoding FERC Order No. 1920” webinar, along with the program materials.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 12, 2024

Join projects & energy transition partner Ben Reiter at Infocast's Transmission & Interconnection Summit, where he will moderate the “Dealing with the Impacts of Increased Interconnection Request Requirements and Costs” panel.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 4, 2024

Join projects & energy transition partners Hayden Harms and Vanessa Wilson at Infocast's RNG & SAF Capital Markets Summit, where Hayden will moderate the "Investor Perspectives: Private Equity, Infrastructure Funds, & Strategies" panel, and Vanessa will moderate the "Opportunities in Other Biogas/Fuels Markets" panel.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.