Industry Updates from the UT Renewable Energy Law Conference

Feb 5, 2021

Reading Time : 2 min

Conference Highlights:

  • Akin Gump Counsel Hayden Harms served as Presiding Officer for the Tuesday afternoon presentations.
  • High conference attendance confirms a continued and growing interest in renewable technology. With “green initiatives” being supported by the majority of Congress and the White House, everyone from Fortune 100 corporations to city-dwelling homeowners are looking for opportunities to make and/or save money using renewable technologies.
  • COVID-19 continues to disrupt all segments of the renewable energy industry, but participants have been largely successful in finding ways to allocate risk sufficiently to avoid unnecessary or unexpected costs or delays.

What message resonated most from the Renewable Energy Law Conference? Did you notice any changes from the conference last year?

  • With a new administration in the White House, many issues regarding renewable energy policy are up for debate, including tax credit extensions, import tariffs, carbon pricing, transmission, offshore wind, standalone storage and alternative fuels. How the new administration’s policies are expected to impact these topics over the next four years were questions clearly at the top of many presenters’ and attendees’ minds.

    A key trend we noted last year was the growing attendance of historically hydrocarbon-related companies at the conference—learning how their businesses can incorporate and profit from these new technologies; this year, while we expect many of the same players were in attendance, a key takeaway was how focused participants and presenters were on how the federal government is going to impact existing opportunities, and what new opportunities are anticipated.

What were the key drafting tips related to addressing COVID-19 in commercial contracts?

  • COVID-19 is causing disruptions in just about all business models in the renewable energy sector. Key takeaways for properly addressing COVID-19 are: (i) identify and carve-out all impacts of COVID-19 prior to the effective date of the contract, (ii) determine if COVID-19 will have a large enough impact to require its own section in the agreement, or if it can be addressed in the “force majeure” definition, and (iii) identify acceptable measures of relief (i.e., cost relief vs. schedule relief).
  • If addressed in the force majeure definition, do not forget to (i) anticipate relief for “governmental orders” and (ii) determine if your state follows ejusdem generis (allowing broad applicability of common force majeure events) or if COVID-19 will need to be specifically identified.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

December 5, 2024

On November 27, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued Venture Global CP2 LNG, LLC, an order that sets aside, in part, the Commission’s prior authorization of the CP2 LNG Terminal and CP Express Pipeline Project (collectively, the CP2 Project) under sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA). 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 5, 2024

On November 27, 2024, in Venture Global, CP2 LNG, LLC,1 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC or Commission) explicitly overruled precedent set in Northern Natural Gas Co.,2 a 2021 decision in which FERC made an affirmative finding that an interstate natural gas pipeline project it was certificating under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) would not make a “significant” contribution to global climate change. Northern Natural is the only FERC decision in which a so-called significance determination was made with respect to greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) arising from a FERC-regulated natural gas infrastructure project. In Venture Global, FERC rejected arguments that it needed to follow Northern Natural and assess the significance of GHG emissions in all NGA certificate proceedings to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA requires federal agencies, including FERC, that perform “major federal actions,” which include issuing NGA section 7 certificates, to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) if the action will “significantly affect[] the quality of the human environment.”3 FERC has been under pressure to fully explain why it has chosen not to apply Northern Natural’s significance analysis in subsequent cases, and that issue is currently before FERC on remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) in Healthy Gulf et al. v. FERC, which reviewed FERC’s approval of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal under NGA section 3.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 4, 2024

On November 21, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued Order No. 1920-A1 addressing requests for rehearing and clarification of FERC’s landmark final rule on transmission planning and cost allocation issued in May 2024. While the Commission largely affirmed the final rule, the order grants rehearing of some of the more controversial aspects of Order No. 1920.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 26, 2024

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Post-Election Outlook for the Energy Sector.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

August 7, 2024

*Thank you to JaKell Larson, 2024 Akin Summer Associate, for her valuable collaboration on this article.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 31, 2024

Interstate oil, liquid and refined products pipelines regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) will soon be able to raise their transportation rates (provided they were set using FERC’s popular Index rate methodology) in the wake of a significant new decision by the District of Columbia Circuit (the D.C. Circuit) in Liquid Energy Pipeline Association v. FERC (LEPA).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 29, 2024

On Wednesday, July 24, 2024, the U.S. House of Representative Committee on Energy and Commerce held a Subcommittee on Energy, Climate, and Grid Security hearing to review the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request. Members of the Subcommittee had the opportunity to hear testimony from all five Commissioners, including FERC Chairman Willie Phillips and Commissioner Mark Christie, as well as the three recently confirmed commissioners, David Rosner, Lindsay See and Judy Chang. In addition to their prepared remarks, the five commissioners answered questions on FERC’s mandate to provide affordable and reliable electricity and natural gas services nationwide, while also ensuring it fulfills its primary mission of maintaining just and reasonable rates.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 29, 2024

On July 9, 2024, the U.S. Court of the Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) erred in ordering refunds for certain bilateral spot market transactions in the Western Energy Coordinating Council (WECC) region that exceeded the $1,000/megawatt-hour (MWh) “soft” price cap for such sales.1 Finding FERC failed to conduct a “Mobile-Sierra public-interest analysis” before “altering” those contracts by ordering refunds, the court vacated FERC’s orders and remanded the case to FERC for further proceedings.2

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.