BEIS Guidance Notes on Climate-Related Disclosure Obligations

May 10, 2022

Reading Time : 4 min

By: Amy Kennedy, George O'Malley, Oliver Haynes, Trainee Solicitor (not admitted to practice)

Scope

The Guidance Notes affirm the original proposals for which companies and LLPs fell in-scope of the Regulations and clarified some ambiguities for groups spread across multiple jurisdictions.

Prior to April 6, 2022, U.K. companies that have more than 500 employees and have either transferable securities admitted to trading on a U.K. regulated market or undertake banking insurance activities (Relevant Public Interest Entities (PIEs)) were required to produce a nonfinancial information statement.

The Regulations enlarge the content requirements of those nonfinancial information statements and extend these expanded obligations to further include the following entities in respect of financial years beginning on or after April 6, 2022:

  • U.K. registered companies with securities admitted to AIM with more than 500 employees.
  • U.K. registered companies not included in the categories above that have more than 500 employees and a turnover of more than £500 million.
  • Large LLPs that are not traded or banking LLPs and have more than 500 employees and a turnover of more than £500 million.
  • Traded LLPs or banking LLPs that have more than 500 employees.

In-scope subsidiaries were confirmed to be exempt from individually making such reports if their U.K.-based parent company provided consolidated accounts on behalf of the group. Where the parent providing consolidated accounts is a non-U.K. incorporated company, the U.K.-based subsidiary must separately comply with the Regulations. Subsidiaries of parents who do not produce consolidated accounts must comply with climate-related financial disclosures in their individual accounts, and their U.K.-based parents should determine their scope eligibility with reference to the aggregated turnover and employee figures of the group they head.

Content Guidelines

A chief concern raised during the consultation process was whether the disclosure requirements would actually provide investors, regulators and other stakeholders with sufficient information to assess climate-related risks. The Guidance Notes have responded to these concerns—providing more in-depth guidance as to the content of the required disclosures (see our “Table of Content Guidelines for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures”) and incorporating elements from across the more granular 11 Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations that many respondents thought ought to be included. Such content guidance also addressed questions regarding the need for “scenario analysis” and materiality thresholds. For the former, the Guidance Notes seem to clarify that although scenario-analysis is not strictly mandatory, the main recommendation for complying with the obligation to assess a business’s “climate resilience” was to conduct qualitative scenario analyses in relevant sectors. For the latter, the Guidance Notes reiterate the government’s position that directors have the right to omit certain disclosure requirements from their report provided proper justification is given.

More broadly, the Guidance Notes affirm that (i) disclosures must be consistent with relevant accounting standards; (ii) there are no prescriptive formatting requirements; and (iii) where relevant information is not included in the annual report and accounts of a company, a specific cross-reference to where the information might be found ought to be included.

Liability and Ramifications

Given the discretion afforded to directors in omitting or including relevant information, the Guidance Notes confirm that responsibility for the disclosures ultimately lies with the directors, even where third party information is relied upon to help generate the report.

Where the disclosures are found to be inadequate, the U.K. Financial Reporting Council can apply to the court for a declaration that the strategic report, directors’ report, or annual report and accounts of a company do not comply with the requirements of the U.K. Companies Act 2006. The court may then order the preparation of revised accounts/reports and other such matters the court thinks fit.

Interaction With Other Legislation

Overlap between the Regulations and other pieces of legislation has been acknowledged by the BEIS. The Guidance Notes clarify that those companies which also fall under the scope of the climate-related U.K. Listing Rules (“Listing Rules”) and the Streamlined Energy and Carbon Report regime (SECR) will still need to comply with both sets of regimes where applicable. Although the Guidance Notes state that the Listing Rules and SECR will likely involve use of similar information, it should be noted that the Listing Rules directly reference the TCFD’s recommendations, recommended disclosures and specified TCFD-published guidance materials, whereas the Regulations only comprise requirements that are aligned with the TCFD’s recommendations. Similarly, the Guidance Notes confirmed that the Regulations complement, and do not duplicate, existing SECR requirements for quoted companies to report on their global energy use and for large businesses to report their U.K. annual energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. For those companies falling within the Listing Rules and SECR, the exact requirements of those regimes should be factored in alongside the Regulations.

The Guidance Notes further confirm that the Regulations are expected to be consistent with the forthcoming International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation disclosure standards and, as such, will be consistent with the broader international standard.

In concert with this post, the authors created a “Table of Content Guidelines for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures.” Please view this content and reach out to any of the lawyers listed on this post and/or your Akin Gump relationship partner if you have any questions.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Sustainability

February 19, 2025

Wind energy projects along the coasts are facing uncertainty due to President Trump’s Presidential Memorandum1 issued on January 20, “Temporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government’s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects.” This Memorandum introduces substantial policy changes that impact both onshore and offshore wind development.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

January 24, 2025

Beginning on Monday, there have been a flurry of executive orders from the Trump administration reversing Biden-era energy policies, emphasizing oil and gas production, lifting the liquified natural gas (LNG) export permitting pause and withdrawing from all accords and commitments under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) including the Paris climate agreement. The orders also target electric vehicles (EVs), wind energy, international climate aid and the use of the social cost of carbon in agency decision making. For close tracking of these orders and more to come, visit the Akin Trump Executive Order tracker. Concurrently, President Trump’s nominees for the Department of the Interior (DOI), Department of Energy (DOE) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have each passed their initial rounds of committee confirmation votes, and now await votes before the Senate floor.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

January 10, 2025

In the final days of his term, President Joe Biden has taken significant steps to solidify his administration’s climate legacy. The administration finalized rules for various clean energy tax credits established under the Inflation Reduction Act. However, these rules, intended to stimulate clean energy advancements through 2032, face opposition from Congressional Republicans, who are considering scaling back or repealing the credits through budget reconciliation.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

December 19, 2024

The twilight hours of the Biden administration and the 118th Congress have been marked by intense legislative and regulatory activity, underscored by President-elect Trump’s derailment of last-minute congressional budget talks, and stalled progress on energy permitting reforms.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

December 11, 2024

The Biden administration’s environmental policies and the future of infrastructure projects are facing pivotal legal challenges and political shifts. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit questioned the viability of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2024 power plant emissions rule, particularly its reliance on carbon capture technology, while the 6th Circuit overturned the EPA’s rejection of Kentucky’s smog plan, which comes only three days after the EPA issued its defense of its “good neighbor” smog control plan responding to the Supreme Court’s decision to halt its implementation in June. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court’s handling of the first National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) case in some time, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, could substantially alter the scope of environmental reviews, with potential immediate implications for the oil & gas industry. These judicial reviews may be influenced by a potential change in administration and Congress, as Trump-era officials, including Vivek Ramaswamy, advocate for scaling back NEPA regulations to expedite infrastructure projects. Additionally, the Department of Energy’s recent clarity on liquified natural gas (LNG) export authorizations underscores the broader tension between expanding fossil fuel infrastructure and adhering to environmental regulations amidst a polarized political and legal landscape.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

October 3, 2024

NYC Climate Week included over 900 events with an estimated 100,000 participants swarming the City. While indicative of growing interest in climate action, some note that the record turnout foreshadows a smaller presence at COP 29 in Azerbaijan.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 19, 2024

Recent legislative and regulatory developments reflect ongoing tensions between environmental policies and economic priorities in the U.S. energy landscape. The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s advancement of three resolutions targeting Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules on power plants, vehicle emissions and air quality standards marks a broader Republican effort to counter President Biden’s environmental agenda, though these resolutions face likely vetoes. In contrast, House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled openness to retaining certain green energy tax credits, reflecting a pragmatic approach as some Republican districts benefit from these investments. Simultaneously, bipartisan efforts to boost critical mineral production, led by Senators Hickenlooper and Tillis, aim to reduce U.S. reliance on Chinese imports, while the White House has raised tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and solar products, a move seen as both protective of domestic industries and potentially disruptive to supply chains. Legal battles continue, as seen in the judicial blocking of the Interior Department’s methane rule in five states and ongoing litigation over EPA’s cross-state pollution rule, which the agency has been allowed to revise. Meanwhile, grid operators have expressed concerns that the EPA’s carbon emissions rule could threaten power plant operations, pushing for legal revisions to protect grid reliability. Together, these developments reflect the broader debate over balancing environmental regulations with economic and energy security concerns.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 12, 2024

After a recent permitting reform bill was passed out of a Senate Committee, House Republicans took steps to draft their own permitting reform legislation. Rep. Westerman (R- AR) held a hearing to discuss his draft bill, which most notably places limitations on the environmental permitting process for energy projects. This comes as both parties position energy policy as a key election issue, with Vice President Harris recognizing a role for oil and gas production during the Presidential debate in response to Republican criticism of her climate policies. Meanwhile, former President Trump vowed to pull back unspent dollars approved for greenhouse gas reduction and energy transition projects under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The IRA has already spurred significant renewable energy investment, particularly in rural electric co-ops using the funds to replace coal generation with clean energy and battery storage.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.