Corp Fin’s Climate Disclosure Review is Here – What to Expect and How to Prepare

Sep 30, 2021

Reading Time : 5 min

Below we provide further background, a summary of the types of comments that a company may anticipate receiving and some key takeaways.

Background

In 2010, the SEC published an interpretive release (the 2010 Climate Change Guidance), which requires companies to consider in disclosures “the impact of pending or existing climate-change related legislation, regulations, and international accords; the indirect consequences of regulation or business trends; and the physical impacts of climate change.” Since 2010, the SEC had remained largely silent on climate change until this year, when it began to release a number of statements on, and take several notable actions related to, climate change disclosures and climate risks.

In February, then-Acting Chair Allison Herren Lee directed Corp Fin to review the extent to which public companies have addressed the topics identified in the 2010 Climate Change Guidance. The climate-related disclosure comments published last week, as well as the actual letters that have been issued to companies, are a result of this review.

In March, the SEC requested comment on 15 questions related to the SEC’s regulation of climate change disclosures. Requests for input included, among others: the appropriate approach to regulating climate disclosure; the use of third-party reporting frameworks; the degree to which registrants can measure climate risk; how the commission should enforce disclosures; and whether the SEC should institute a broader environment, social and governance (ESG) disclosure framework. In a recent speech, Chair Gary Gensler asserted that investors increasingly want to understand public companies’ climate risks and are looking for consistent, comparable and decision-useful disclosures to help them invest in companies that fit their needs. Supporting this claim, Chair Gensler cited the more than 550 unique comment letters that have been submitted in response to the request for public comment on climate change disclosures, of which three out of every four letters support some level of mandatory climate change disclosure rules.

Sample Comments

Depending on the particular facts and circumstances, information related to climate change-related risks and opportunities may be required in various disclosure items in a company’s SEC filings (e.g., the description of business, legal proceedings, risk factors and management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) of financial condition and results of operations). The sample comments, grouped into three disclosure categories, are summarized below.

General

  • Provide the considerations given to including the same type of climate-related disclosure in your SEC filings as your corporate social responsibility (CSR) report.

Risk Factors

  • Disclose the material effects of climate change transition risks that may affect your business, financial condition and results of operations.
  • Disclose any material litigation risks related to climate change and explain the potential impact to the company.

MD&A

  • Revise your disclosure to identify material pending or existing climate change-related legislation, regulations and international accords, and describe any material effect on your business, financial condition and results of operations.
  • Revise your disclosure to identify and, if material, quantify any material past and/or future capital expenditures for climate-related projects.
  • If material, discuss the indirect consequences of climate-related regulation or business trends.
  • If material, discuss the physical effects of climate change on your operations and results.
  • Quantify any material increased compliance costs related to climate change.
  • If material, provide disclosure about your purchase or sale of carbon credits or offsets and any material effects on your business, financial condition and results of operations.

What to Expect

The Corp Fin disclosure review, together with the input elicited from the request for comment, is expected to formulate an update to the 2010 Climate Change Guidance. However, a number of technical, pragmatic and even fundamental questions remain. Such questions include, among others:

  • Will the new disclosures be incorporated into existing rules such as Regulation S-K or Regulation S-X, or created as part of a new regulation devoted entirely to climate risks?
  • Should the rules incorporate or draw on existing frameworks, such as those developed by the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) or the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)?
  • What information related to climate risks can be quantified and measured and how do you create a set of metrics applicable across industries?
  • Does the SEC have Congressional authority to regulate, through disclosure, climate-related issues?

While the proposing release for such rulemaking was forecast to be published by October of this year, given the timing of the Corp Fin comment letters and the volume of comments received in response to the SEC’s request for comment, Chair Gensler has recently signaled a delay of the proposing release and it appears nearly certain that it will not be published before December. As such, the proposing release is unlikely to impact Form 10-K disclosure (for calendar year-end issuers).

How to Prepare

Because some form of climate-related rulemaking is forthcoming, it is likely that many companies will want to be constructive to the process as the SEC gathers facts and evaluates the responses to any climate-related comments. However, considering that many companies do not currently consider climate-related issues quantitatively, or even qualitatively, material (under the SEC’s historical formulation of such term), it appears unlikely that many companies will volunteer much information in the comment letter process that does not meet such threshold.

Nevertheless, given that both the SEC and investing public are focused on climate-related issues, companies can take a proactive approach to avoiding future climate-related comment letters or shareholder proposals. Below are a few suggestions for consideration:

CSR report review

  • Ensure that there are no inconsistencies between disclosures in your CSR report and any of your SEC reports.
  • Confirm that there are no statements, forecasts or commitments contained in your CSR report that are materially false or misleading.
  • Memorialize internal processes and procedures that are used to prepare your CSR report and consider whether such processes and procedures are consistent with existing disclosure controls.
  • Include appropriately tailored forward-looking statement disclaimers.
  • Include definitions or footnotes to describe any assumptions or exclusions to the data provided.

Form 10-K review

  • Revisit your regulatory and legal proceedings discussions (where relevant) and risk factors and consider if any such disclosures need to be updated given the increased focus on, and regulatory action related to, climate change.
  • Review and align your risk factors and forward-looking statement disclaimers related to any additional disclosure.
  • Consider whether any of your CSR report disclosures warrant inclusion in your Form 10-K, even if not quantitatively or qualitatively material, based on the fact that climate change is increasingly important to many investors.
  • Absent the provision of any CSR report disclosures, consider providing a discussion of the consideration the company gives to climate-related issues, including known trends.

We will continue to monitor these developments closely and publish follow-up information and analyses when warranted.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Sustainability

December 11, 2024

The Biden administration’s environmental policies and the future of infrastructure projects are facing pivotal legal challenges and political shifts. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit questioned the viability of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2024 power plant emissions rule, particularly its reliance on carbon capture technology, while the 6th Circuit overturned the EPA’s rejection of Kentucky’s smog plan, which comes only three days after the EPA issued its defense of its “good neighbor” smog control plan responding to the Supreme Court’s decision to halt its implementation in June. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court’s handling of the first National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) case in some time, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, could substantially alter the scope of environmental reviews, with potential immediate implications for the oil & gas industry. These judicial reviews may be influenced by a potential change in administration and Congress, as Trump-era officials, including Vivek Ramaswamy, advocate for scaling back NEPA regulations to expedite infrastructure projects. Additionally, the Department of Energy’s recent clarity on liquified natural gas (LNG) export authorizations underscores the broader tension between expanding fossil fuel infrastructure and adhering to environmental regulations amidst a polarized political and legal landscape.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

October 3, 2024

NYC Climate Week included over 900 events with an estimated 100,000 participants swarming the City. While indicative of growing interest in climate action, some note that the record turnout foreshadows a smaller presence at COP 29 in Azerbaijan.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 19, 2024

Recent legislative and regulatory developments reflect ongoing tensions between environmental policies and economic priorities in the U.S. energy landscape. The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s advancement of three resolutions targeting Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules on power plants, vehicle emissions and air quality standards marks a broader Republican effort to counter President Biden’s environmental agenda, though these resolutions face likely vetoes. In contrast, House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled openness to retaining certain green energy tax credits, reflecting a pragmatic approach as some Republican districts benefit from these investments. Simultaneously, bipartisan efforts to boost critical mineral production, led by Senators Hickenlooper and Tillis, aim to reduce U.S. reliance on Chinese imports, while the White House has raised tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and solar products, a move seen as both protective of domestic industries and potentially disruptive to supply chains. Legal battles continue, as seen in the judicial blocking of the Interior Department’s methane rule in five states and ongoing litigation over EPA’s cross-state pollution rule, which the agency has been allowed to revise. Meanwhile, grid operators have expressed concerns that the EPA’s carbon emissions rule could threaten power plant operations, pushing for legal revisions to protect grid reliability. Together, these developments reflect the broader debate over balancing environmental regulations with economic and energy security concerns.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 12, 2024

After a recent permitting reform bill was passed out of a Senate Committee, House Republicans took steps to draft their own permitting reform legislation. Rep. Westerman (R- AR) held a hearing to discuss his draft bill, which most notably places limitations on the environmental permitting process for energy projects. This comes as both parties position energy policy as a key election issue, with Vice President Harris recognizing a role for oil and gas production during the Presidential debate in response to Republican criticism of her climate policies. Meanwhile, former President Trump vowed to pull back unspent dollars approved for greenhouse gas reduction and energy transition projects under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The IRA has already spurred significant renewable energy investment, particularly in rural electric co-ops using the funds to replace coal generation with clean energy and battery storage.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

August 14, 2024

With U.S. elections rapidly approaching, presidential candidates are expected to foreshadow key aspects of their energy and environmental legislative and policy agendas. In particular, the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 may prompt Vice President Kamala Harris to balance legislative progress with her environmental justice commitments. The proposed bill promises to expedite clean energy projects but also aids fossil fuel industries and potentially at odds with front-line environmental justice communities. While White House climate adviser John Podesta expresses cautious optimism about the bill’s post-election prospects, environmental groups are calling on Harris to oppose the bill. Similarly, Harris’ running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, takes a nuanced stance on mining projects near sensitive watersheds, balancing the difficult trade-offs in advancing clean energy mandates while maintaining resource development. This exhibits the complex negotiations required to align bipartisan support behind the democratic ticket’s climate goals ahead of the presidential election.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

August 8, 2024

On August 6, 2024, Vice President Kamala Harris selected Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate in the 2024 election. Walz, a little-known figure in national politics, serving in his second term as governor in Minnesota, has implemented far reaching energy policies after winning a democratic trifecta in 2023. Two bills establishing a mandate for carbon-free electricity in Minnesota by 2040 and simplifying the energy permitting process mirror current federal policy proposals. Expect to see Walz on the campaign trail linking his experience to the need for federal action.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

August 1, 2024

On Wednesday, July 31, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved a permitting and grid development package, spearheaded by Chair Joe Manchin (I-WV) and Ranking Member John Barrasso (R-WY). The bipartisan bill paves the way for renewable energy projects, oil and gas leases, and grid improvements, as well as reversing the Biden administration’s pause on liquefied natural gas export permits. This legislative progress aligns with the U.S. Department of Energy’s allocation of $30 million in initial funding to the Appalachian hydrogen hub, which aims to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions through hydrogen fueling stations and carbon storage sites. However, environmental groups are pushing back against the Manchin-Barrasso permitting bill as well as newly proposed exemptions to the 45V hydrogen tax credits by Senate Democrats, arguing that these changes would undermine carbon-reduction goals. Simultaneously, the Biden administration is investing $575 million in federal grants to enhance climate resilience in coastal communities, indicating a comprehensive approach to addressing both immediate and long-term climate challenges through legislative, financial and infrastructural measures.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

July 26, 2024

Key topics in Akin’s July 2024 Sustainability/ESG Policy and Regulatory Update include:

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.