Top 10 Topics for Directors in 2020: Executive Summary

Jan 9, 2020

Reading Time : 4 min

International Trade

The international trade landscape is poised for change during the opening weeks of 2020. President Donald Trump’s trade initiatives—including those dealing with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), China, Japan and the World Trade Organization (WTO)—will likely come to fruition, essentially remaking bilateral trading relationships in the New Year. At the same time, the United States and United Kingdom are preparing to navigate a post-Brexit world as of January 31, 2020. We expect trade policy to become a defining issue for the 2020 presidential campaign.

Economic Downturn

Today’s economic, regulatory and political climates are uncertain, so members of boards of directors should take steps in 2020 to get ready for an economic downturn and prepare for restructuring. Corporate boards might not be able to fully safeguard against typical economic downturn challenges, like a reduction in access to public and private capital markets. However, they can still prepare. Evaluating and mitigating potential downside risks facing your business is key. Plus, familiarizing yourself with general legal and practical principles associated with operating in a low liquidity environment can go a long way.

Board Diversity

Diversity and inclusion can provide a competitive advantage and enable growth, so many companies have made them a top priority. Despite this, the number of women and minorities serving on boards of directors still doesn’t reflect the makeup of the general population. Change starts in the boardroom, where it’s important in 2020 for board members to take an active role in guiding a company culture that values human capital. You should review your company’s diversity policies, as well as board nomination procedures to ensure they encourage gender and ethnic diversity.

Corporate Reputation

The Internet has made it possible for anyone to falsely attack online the products and brands, leadership, securities, markets and overall integrity of major corporations. So it’s more important than ever to protect your company’s reputation. The law provides some tools that can be used to deflect an organized attack on reputation, but the best defense in protecting the hard-earned good name of any business is vigilance, caution and a willingness to act when the threat to reputation is real and immediate.

Pay Equity

The legal landscape around pay equity is shifting in the right direction, as recently enacted state and local laws aim to eliminate pay differences. When closing the pay gap in 2020, boards of directors must consider crucial issues. Finding a way to achieve pay equity is a complex endeavor that involves a mix of business decisions and legal considerations. However, determining your company’s vulnerability to equal pay claims and making adjustments where needed is one way to mitigate the risk of future claims and create a positive public narrative.

Cybersecurity

The nation’s toughest privacy law—the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)—went into effect on January 1, 2020. The law ushers in a new era of data governance and data privacy. At the same time, cyber breach activity continues to escalate. So cybersecurity and data privacy should be considered a significant risk area for companies. The CCPA is not limited to companies located in California. It’s crucial to evaluate whether your company falls under the CCPA’s reach and carefully structure data privacy practices to comply with the many requirements.

Shareholder Activism

Chief executive officer and board representation of women and minorities at public companies is increasing slowly, despite a focus on gender and racial diversity by institutional investors, lawmakers and shareholder activists. A new gender and ethnic diversity initiative implementing a version of the National Football League’s (NFL’s) “Rooney Rule” calls on companies to adopt a policy requiring the consideration of both women and minorities for every open board seat and CEO appointment. Launched by New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer, the initiative is one component of a broad-based gender and ethnic diversity activism campaign by investors for 2020.

Corporate Innovation

Today’s challenging business environment is largely driven by technology, so boards of directors must continually harness strategic innovation to stay competitive. In 2020, we expect companies to add directors with meaningful technology-related background and experience. Your nominating committee should consider technology expertise as one of the factors in the overall mix of skills that are essential for the board to possess. At the same time, it’s essential to think about the potential legal and regulatory implications on the front end, as legislation catches up to emerging technologies.

Environmental, Social and Governance

Whether domestically or abroad, the private sector is reenvisioning its role in society by prioritizing environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues and reporting. The United States and other jurisdictions are moving toward heightened ESG accountability and transparency. Steps taken by major U.S. private sector organizations and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce illustrate that policy and practice are on a path forward in 2020. Meanwhile, the international regulatory trend is farther along toward required ESG reporting. A new European Union (EU) regulation requires higher levels of sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector.

Bonus: #MeToo Movement

Allegations of sexual harassment against a C-suite or other senior executive can have devastating consequences for any company. To minimize damage in 2020, you should have a comprehensive harassment allegation response plan in place before an incident occurs. Quickly responding to any allegations can lead to better solutions and reduce the risk of litigation. Additionally, your board of directors should conduct an honest review of company culture, and take steps to put appropriate training and policies in place.

View the full report here.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.