AI Auditing Framework – Draft ICO Guidance Published for Consultation

Feb 26, 2020

Reading Time : 2 min

By: Jenny Arlington, Cassandra Padget (Trainee Solicitor)

The ICO states that it understands the distinct benefits which AI can bring, but also the risks it can pose to the rights and freedoms of individuals. AI is therefore one of ICO’s top three strategic priorities, and it is why the ICO decided to develop a framework for auditing AI compliance with data protection obligations. The framework comprises (i) auditing tools and procedures that the ICO will use in audits and investigations and (ii) the draft guidance, which includes indicative risk and control measures that organizations and individuals can deploy when they use AI to process personal data. The framework connects with other work streams undertaken by the ICO in relation to AI, including as to how organizations can best explain their use of AI to individuals (the draft ExplAIn guidance, due to be published in final form later this year) and the ICO’s investigation in relation to use of live facial recognition technology.

The draft guidance has a broad focus on the management of several different risks arising from AI systems as well as governance and accountability measures, and it is thus the first of its kind. The guidance provides “best practice” and it is not a statutory code. It is structured in four parts, each of which corresponds to different data protection principles. The guidance provides recommendations for organizational and technical measures aimed at mitigating the risks to individuals that AI may cause or enhance. For example, the guidance includes sample risk statements and proposed controls, which are either preventative, detective or corrective.

The ICO has stressed that it aims for the guidance to be both conceptually sound and applicable to real life situations, because it will shape how the ICO will regulate in this space. The ICO states that feedback from those developing and implementing AI systems is essential, and hence it seeks feedback from two groups in particular:

  • Those with a compliance focus, such as data protection officers, general counsel and risk managers, in particular those with responsibilities for signing off on the implementation of AI systems in their organizations.
  • Technology specialists, including machine learning experts, data scientists, software developers and engineers, and cybersecurity and information technology (IT) risk managers.

The period of consultation on the draft guidance will close on April 1, 2020, and any feedback must be provided by then, either by way of submitting the online questionnaire or by e-mailing the ICO at AIAuditingFramework@ico.org.uk.

The final guidance is expected to be published in the summer of 2020.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

Data Dive

June 11, 2024

In May, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued updated recommendations for security controls for controlled unclassified information (CUI) that is processed, stored or transmitted by nonfederal organizations using nonfederal systems, (NIST Special Publication 800-171 (SP 800-171), Revision 3). These security requirements are “intended for use by federal agencies in contractual vehicles or other agreements that are established between those agencies and nonfederal organizations.”1 While these new controls are only applicable to nonfederal entities that agree to comply with the new issuance, Revision 3 signals the next phase of expected security for government contractors.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.