California Approves Final California Consumer Privacy Act Regulations

Aug 19, 2020

Reading Time : 3 min

By: Natasha G. Kohne, Rebecca Kocsis (Legal Project Analyst)

The regulations accepted by the OAL contained revisions from the OAG, which are summarized in an addendum to the final statement of reasons (“Addendum”). The Addendum is available here.

Summary of Changes

The OAG classifies many of the changes to the regulations as non-substantive and meant to improve accuracy, consistency and clarity. For example, the word “minor” was changed to “consumer” in order to align the regulations with the statute. However, the provisions the OAG withdrew or modified reflect the key substantive changes.

The OAG withdrew certain provisions for additional consideration. As specified in the Addendum, the following provisions were withdrawn:

  • 999.305(a)(5): A business shall not use a consumer’s personal information for a purpose materially different than those disclosed in the notice at collection. If the business seeks to use a consumer’s previously collected personal information for a purpose materially different than what was previously disclosed to the consumer in the notice at collection, the business shall directly notify the consumer of this new use and obtain explicit consent from the consumer to use it for this new purpose.
  • 999.306(b)(2): A business that substantially interacts with consumers offline shall also provide notice to the consumer by an offline method that facilitates consumer awareness of their right to opt-out. Such methods include, but are not limited to, printing the notice on paper forms that collect personal information, providing the consumer with a paper version of the notice and posting signage directing consumers to where the notice can be found online.
  • 999.315(c): A business’s methods for submitting requests to opt-out shall be easy for consumers to execute and shall require minimal steps to allow the consumer to opt-out. A business shall not utilize a method that is designed with the purpose or has the substantial effect of subverting or impairing a consumer’s decision to opt-out.
  • 999.326(c): A business may deny a request from an authorized agent that does not submit proof that they have been authorized by the consumer to act on their behalf.

Other notable changes include:

  • Deletion of “Do Not Sell My Info” Option for Opt-Out Link. The regulations removed the option to use “Do Not Sell My Info” rather than the longer form “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” for a business’s opt-out link, which was present in several provisions. The Addendum notes that this was done “to align with the express language of the statute.”
  • Businesses Can Require Signed Permission for Authorized Agents for Consumer Opt-Outs. The OAG revised § 999.315(f) (previously §999.315(g)), which addresses the ability of a consumer to use an authorized agent to submit a request to opt-out, to specify that a business may deny a request from an authorized agent “if the agent cannot provide to the business the consumer’s signed permission demonstrating” that they have been authorized to act on the consumer’s behalf. Previously, the regulations included the broad statement that businesses can require that an authorized agent submit proof that they could act on the consumer’s behalf. The Addendum noted that this was changed for “clarity and to be consistent with other parts of the regulation.”

Looking Ahead

Now that the regulations are in effect, businesses should immediately review their outward facing privacy policies, opt-out links (where relevant) and internal procedures to ensure that they comply with the regulations requirements. As we noted in our analysis of the final draft regulations in a June 29 Bloomberg Law article, titled “Decoding CCPA’s Final Regulations Before Act Takes Effect,” the regulations provide additional detail on key CCPA obligations including proper notices, service provider provisions and how to comply with consumer requests.

The CCPA is one of the most comprehensive and far-reaching privacy laws in the United States, offering California consumers control over their personal information and strong privacy protections for consumers. Since the CCPA was signed into law on June 28, 2018, it has gone through two rounds of amendments before going into effect on January 1, 2020. The AGO’s office has been consistent in its commitment to enforce the CCPA. The regulations have taken effect on the heels of the July 1, 2020 effective date for the AG’s enforcement power. Although the regulations have just become effective, California residents have taken full advantage of the private right to action, which we discussed in Law360 in “Lessons From 6 Months Of Calif. Privacy Law Litigation.”

We will continue to monitor developments with the AG’s enforcement of the CCPA, as well as class action cases that cite the CCPA. If you have any questions about your company’s obligations, and compliance and risk mitigation efforts, please contact a member of the Akin Gump Cybersecurity, Privacy and Data Protection team.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

March 3, 2025

On January 16, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule updating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection (COPPA) Rule, significantly expanding compliance obligations for online services that collect, use, or disclose personal information from children under 13.1 The amendments impose new restrictions on targeted advertising, add data security requirements, refine parental consent mechanisms, and introduce additional compliance measures.

...

Read More

Data Dive

February 21, 2025

On January 8, 2025, the DOJ published a final rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 22, 2025

On January 17, 2025, days before the inauguration, former President Joe Biden issued an executive order titled Strengthening and Promoting Innovation in the Nation's Cybersecurity (EO 14144). Building on previous efforts, including Executive Order 14028, this directive seeks to bolster cybersecurity across federal systems, supply chains and critical infrastructure from adversarial nations, particularly from the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 10, 2025

UPDATE: The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has extended the deadline for submitting public comments from January 14 to February 19, 2025, in response to the recent California wildfires. This extension aims to afford stakeholders additional time to provide comprehensive and detailed feedback, considering the significant challenges posed by the wildfires.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 25, 2024

Treasury has issued a Final Rule to implement President Biden’s 2023 EO targeting U.S. investments in Chinese companies engaged in certain activities related to semiconductors, quantum computing or AI.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.