FTC Requires Company to Delete Proprietary Algorithm as Penalty for Alleged Misuse of Data

Jan 28, 2021

Reading Time : 2 min

The FTC alleged that in 2017, EverAlbum enabled face recognition by default for all users of its photo storage app, Ever, in connection with the rollout of a new organizational “Friends” feature on the app. Allegedly, behind the scenes, EverAlbum did not limit the use of face recognition to the Friends feature, but instead also pulled images from users’ photos to further develop facial recognition software and to build services for Paravision. The FTC alleged two counts of violating Section 5(a) of the FTC Act.

The FTC’s first count alleged that EverAlbum misrepresented to users in customer support articles that the facial recognition technology would not be in use unless the user affirmatively activated the Friends feature, when in reality the feature was allegedly in use by default and could not be deactivated by the user. The second count alleged the company misrepresented that it would delete user content if they deactivated their accounts when, in reality, the company allegedly kept user content indefinitely. The company neither admitted nor denied the allegations in its settlement.

In an important “course correction” as dubbed by Commissioner Rohit Chopra, the FTC chose not to allow EverAlbum to keep the “fruits” of its alleged conduct but instead required in the proposed consent order that EverAlbum must delete the user content and also the algorithms and models developed using improperly obtained user content. This decision contrasts with past settlements for similar alleged conduct that did not require the forfeiture of intellectual property, including the landmark action taken against Google and YouTube for their alleged use of children’s personal information for development of behavioral advertising.

The Commissioner also encouraged the proliferation of state laws on the topics of face recognition and biometrics, noting that “[b]ecause the people of Illinois, Washington, and Texas passed laws related to [these topics],” EverAlbum allegedly targeted the user content of individuals living in states without such specific protections, offering the option to opt-out of the face recognition feature only to users in Illinois, Texas, Washington and the European Union.

As noted by Commissioner Chopra and the press release for the administrative complaint and consent order, EverAlbum owes no monetary damages and no civil penalties unless the consent order is violated. Commission Chopra has vocally criticized such outcomes in recent published work, however, advocating for use of Section 5(m)(1)(B) of the FTC Act, which allows the FTC to seek civil penalties against companies for “Penalty Offenses,” which are committed with knowledge that the FTC has condemned the conduct in a cease-and-desist order. Coupled with the Supreme Court’s pending decision in FTC v. AMG Mgmt., LLC, No. 19-508, which could limit the FTC’s ability to recover monetary relief in federal court under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, the stage is set for potential resurrection of the “penalty offense” practice.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

March 3, 2025

On January 16, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule updating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection (COPPA) Rule, significantly expanding compliance obligations for online services that collect, use, or disclose personal information from children under 13.1 The amendments impose new restrictions on targeted advertising, add data security requirements, refine parental consent mechanisms, and introduce additional compliance measures.

...

Read More

Data Dive

February 21, 2025

On January 8, 2025, the DOJ published a final rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 22, 2025

On January 17, 2025, days before the inauguration, former President Joe Biden issued an executive order titled Strengthening and Promoting Innovation in the Nation's Cybersecurity (EO 14144). Building on previous efforts, including Executive Order 14028, this directive seeks to bolster cybersecurity across federal systems, supply chains and critical infrastructure from adversarial nations, particularly from the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 10, 2025

UPDATE: The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has extended the deadline for submitting public comments from January 14 to February 19, 2025, in response to the recent California wildfires. This extension aims to afford stakeholders additional time to provide comprehensive and detailed feedback, considering the significant challenges posed by the wildfires.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 25, 2024

Treasury has issued a Final Rule to implement President Biden’s 2023 EO targeting U.S. investments in Chinese companies engaged in certain activities related to semiconductors, quantum computing or AI.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.