Preemption: The Fight for the Supreme Law of the Land

Jun 18, 2019

Reading Time : 2 min

After passage of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in 2018, the industry began to worry about the potential headache resulting from a patchwork of divergent state privacy laws. Given the size of California’s economy and the large presence of tech companies in the state, without federal legislation preemption, the CCPA would effectively become the law of the land. All eyes have now turned to Washington to see how Congress will react.

As the 116th Congress began, a bipartisan working group in the Senate set out to develop legislation to address consumer data privacy at the federal level. Six months later, that working group has yet to publicly release any draft legislation or even guiding principles. Similarly, in the House, the committee of jurisdiction has quietly been working on federal privacy legislation, but has not shared any updates with the public or industry stakeholders. Ultimately, comprehensive legislation, particularly on a topic as complicated and nuanced as data privacy, is difficult to enact. Add in the historically complicated political dynamics surrounding preemption and the task becomes even more difficult.

At this halfway point in the year, Democrats in both the House and Senate seem open to supporting a federal data privacy law that preempts California and other states, but only in exchange for high privacy standards that may be difficult for their Republican colleagues or industry to accept. As always, the devil is in the details.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who has been relatively quiet during the legislative negotiations, adds an additional complicating layer of politics to the debate. She not only controls the House agenda, but she is also the senior-most representative from California. Her constituents might prefer that she protect the legislation from her home state rather than acquiesce to its preemption. Observers will be looking to her like the Roman Emperor in the Coliseum. A thumbs down from the Speaker means a privacy law with preemption is all but dead. So far, she has been willing to let the committees work to resolve the issue.

Ultimately, unless industry advocates are quickly able to convince Democrats that preemption is necessary and better for consumers while also convincing Republicans to support a compromise on privacy standards, then the CCPA will become the law of the land on January 1, 2020.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

March 3, 2025

On January 16, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule updating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection (COPPA) Rule, significantly expanding compliance obligations for online services that collect, use, or disclose personal information from children under 13.1 The amendments impose new restrictions on targeted advertising, add data security requirements, refine parental consent mechanisms, and introduce additional compliance measures.

...

Read More

Data Dive

February 21, 2025

On January 8, 2025, the DOJ published a final rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 22, 2025

On January 17, 2025, days before the inauguration, former President Joe Biden issued an executive order titled Strengthening and Promoting Innovation in the Nation's Cybersecurity (EO 14144). Building on previous efforts, including Executive Order 14028, this directive seeks to bolster cybersecurity across federal systems, supply chains and critical infrastructure from adversarial nations, particularly from the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 10, 2025

UPDATE: The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has extended the deadline for submitting public comments from January 14 to February 19, 2025, in response to the recent California wildfires. This extension aims to afford stakeholders additional time to provide comprehensive and detailed feedback, considering the significant challenges posed by the wildfires.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 25, 2024

Treasury has issued a Final Rule to implement President Biden’s 2023 EO targeting U.S. investments in Chinese companies engaged in certain activities related to semiconductors, quantum computing or AI.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.