Supreme Court to Address Secured Creditors’ Right to Credit Bid

December 19, 2011

Reading Time : 2 min

The issue of credit bidding has once again moved into the spotlight, and will in the coming year be the subject of a ruling by the Supreme Court, in what will be the highest court’s first substantive ruling arising from a chapter 11 case in many years.1

In a client alert issued last summer (Seventh Circuit Holds That Secured Lenders Must Have the Opportunity to Credit Bid), we discussed the decision of the Seventh Circuit in the River Road bankruptcy case, in which it held that a proposed plan of reorganization that contemplated the sale of a debtor’s assets free and clear of a dissenting secured lender’s liens could not be confirmed under Bankruptcy Code section 1129(b)(2)(A) unless the proposed plan offered the secured lender the opportunity to credit bid in connection with the sale of the debtor’s assets.2  The River Road decision conflicted with last year’s Third Circuit ruling in In re Philadelphia Newspapers,3 in which the Third Circuit held that a debtor could sell assets free and clear of liens under a proposed plan of reorganization without affording dissenting secured lenders the opportunity to credit bid, and with the Fifth Circuit’s earlier ruling in Pacific Lumber.4

Following the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in River Road, the River Road debtors petitioned the Supreme Court to hear an appeal of the decision.  Such is the importance of this issue to the distressed investing community that the Loan Syndications and Trading Association, despite supporting the winning side of the credit bidding argument at the Seventh Circuit, filed a brief in support of the debtors’ effort to have the Supreme Court hear the case.  With a clear split between the circuits now in existence, the Supreme Court agreed that the time is ripe for the law to be clarified, and for one side or the other in the credit bidding debate to prevail.

On December 12, 2011, the Supreme Court granted the petition and agreed to hear the appeal.  We expect briefing on the appeal to conclude during the spring of 2012, with oral argument to be scheduled shortly thereafter.  Resolution of the circuit court split will have wide-spread ramifications for the lender community and prospective debtors alike, as all eyes turn to the Supreme Court for clarity and guidance on the credit bidding question.


1 According to LSTA article “Credit Bidding Goes to the Supreme Court,” it has been 11 years since the Court has addressed a substantive bankruptcy issue.

2 River Road Hotel Partners, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank, Nos. 09-30029, 09-30047 (7th Cir. June 28, 2011).  [Reference to prior credit bidding client alert].    

3 599 F.3d 298 (3d Cir. 2010).

4 584 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2009).

Contact Information

If you have any questions regarding this alert, please contact—

Fred S. Hodara
fhodara@akingump.com
212.872.8040
New York 

Abid Qureshi
aqureshi@akingump.com
212.872.8027
New York 

Meredith A. Lahaie
mlahaie@akingump.com
212.872.8032
New York 

 

Share This Insight

Related Services, Sectors, and Regions

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.