Bahrain’s New Data Protection Law Now in Force

Aug 20, 2019

Reading Time : 4 min

Bahrain’s adoption of the PDPL may be part of a trend among members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) toward increased data protection oversight. The United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, for example, may both introduce more comprehensive data protection laws in the coming years1

The PDPL includes criminal penalties for certain violations. Data protection laws in the European Union and the United States, in contrast, are generally civil in nature. Criminal violations include the processing of sensitive personal data in contravention of the PDPL or withholding data, information, records or documents requested by the Authority.

The law applies to individuals living and working in Bahrain; organizations with a place of business in Bahrain; and people and organizations that are not present in Bahrain but that process data using means (independently or through third parties) available in Bahrain, unless such processing is solely for the purpose of passing data through Bahrain. The law follows a somewhat analogous dichotomy to the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in defining two main roles with regard to data: (1) data manager, the person who decides (solely or in conjunction with others) the purposes and means of processing; and (2) data processor, the person who processes the data for and on behalf of the data manager.

The collection, processing and transfer of data or personal data and sensitive personal data is protected by the PDPL. Different restrictions apply to the different categories of information. “Data or personal data” is defined as information in any form that is related to an identifiable individual or an individual who can be identified, directly or indirectly, through an identifying factor (e.g., personal ID number, physical, cultural or economic factors). “Sensitive personal data” is a subset of personal data that reveals, directly or indirectly, an individual’s race, ethnicity, political or philosophical views, religious beliefs, union affiliation, criminal record or any data related to his or her health or sexual life. The PDPL more rigorously regulates the processing of sensitive personal data; for example, sensitive personal data may not be processed using automated means.

The PDPL defines “processing” as the carrying out of any operation or set of operations on personal data whether that processing is automated or not. Processing broadly includes, for example, organizing, collecting, storing, retrieving or revealing personal data.

Certain consent restrictions apply to the processing of data under the PDPL. An organization generally must have the consent of the owner of the personal data to process the data. Consent must be (1) written, explicit and relate specifically to the processing of specific data; (2) freely given; and (3) fully informed regarding the intended purpose. The data owner retains the right to withdraw his/her consent at any time. However, there are certain limited exceptions to the requirement for consent, including where the processing is necessary for the implementation of a contract to which the data owner is a party.

In addition, processing certain data is prohibited without first obtaining the prior written authorization of the Authority. For example, the Authority’s prior written authorization is required when automatically processing sensitive personal data or biometric data used for identification purposes, such as thumb prints used on many smart phones. The PDPL prohibits the transfer of personal data out of Bahrain unless it is transferred to a country the Authority includes on its list of approved countries (the “List”). The List, when published, will consist of countries that, in the view of the Authority, have sufficient personal data protections. Transfers to countries that are not on the List are permitted in limited circumstances, for example, where the data owner provides consent or the data was obtained from a public source.

Violation of the PDPL can lead to either civil or criminal liability, depending on the circumstances. With regard to civil public enforcement, the Authority may place a stop order on the collection, processing or transferring of personal data. Stop orders may lead to delays and inconveniences for businesses. The Authority may also impose administrative fines of up to 20,000 BD (approximately $53,000). Individual data owners who have suffered a loss as a result of a violation of the PDPL may bring a civil complaint in the Bahraini courts to seek compensation from the offender. Criminal prosecution may lead to imprisonment for up to one year and/or the imposition of criminal fines of up to 20,000 BD (approximately $53,000).

The PDPL introduces a broad range of new obligations for those who operate within Bahrain or process data using means available in Bahrain. To minimize the risk of liability, covered persons and entities should act now to ensure they are compliant with the law. The following are practical steps to assist with compliance:

  • Determine if you are using means, whether independently or through third parties, available in Bahrain to process personal data.
  • Understand how you process data and seek the consent of the data owner prior to processing, or the prior written authorization of the Authority where required (for example, when automatically processing sensitive or biometric data).
  • Determine whether you are processing personal data and/or sensitive personal data and whether you have sufficient protections in place to meet the different restrictions on the processing of both types of personal data.
  • If you have not done so already, establish a role within your organization to coordinate, monitor and regularly update your data protection program. If the role exists, ensure those responsible are aware of the new PDPL requirements.

1 See, e.g., TechRadar, Privacy regulators in GCC countries get more muscles to flex (Aug. 3, 2019), available at: https://www.techradar.com/news/data-privacy-regulators-in-gcc-countries-get-more-muscles-to-flex.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

Data Dive

June 11, 2024

In May, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued updated recommendations for security controls for controlled unclassified information (CUI) that is processed, stored or transmitted by nonfederal organizations using nonfederal systems, (NIST Special Publication 800-171 (SP 800-171), Revision 3). These security requirements are “intended for use by federal agencies in contractual vehicles or other agreements that are established between those agencies and nonfederal organizations.”1 While these new controls are only applicable to nonfederal entities that agree to comply with the new issuance, Revision 3 signals the next phase of expected security for government contractors.

...

Read More

Data Dive

May 31, 2024

On May 21, 2024, the European Union finalized the adoption of the groundbreaking EU Artificial Intelligence Act, a comprehensive and sector-agnostic legislation that extends globally. This 420-page Act aims to regulate the deployment and development of AI systems, categorizing them into high-risk and low-risk, and even banning certain types of AI. The Act emphasizes trust, transparency, and accountability in AI usage, promoting the safe integration of AI technologies. This legislation sets a potential global benchmark for AI regulation, although its complexity may pose interpretative and implementation challenges for stakeholders. We set out the key provisions below.

...

Read More

Data Dive

May 30, 2024

On May 17, 2024, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed into law S.B. 205, a pioneering piece of legislation aimed at regulating high-risk AI systems. This new law, set to take effect on February 1, 2026, introduces stringent requirements for AI developers and deployers, focusing on risk management and the prevention of algorithmic discrimination. This legislation marks a significant step in state-level AI regulation, potentially setting a precedent similar to the impact of GDPR on privacy laws.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.