Bipartisan Legislation Aims to Expand Federal Protections for Children’s Online Privacy

Jan 15, 2020

Reading Time : 4 min

By: Sidharth Sharma (Transportation Policy & Regulatory Specialist)

The bill, titled the Preventing Real Online Threats Endangering Children Today (PROTECT) Kids Act, would amend COPPA by:

Expanding its protections to children 13–15 years old

Currently, COPPA provides protections related to data collected from children under 13, including parental consent requirements. The PROTECT Kids Act would expand the scope of COPPA to include data collected from children under 16. This would better align COPPA with laws like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) that protect children 16 and under.

Affirming that COPPA applies to operators of mobile apps

COPPA applies to operators of websites and other “online services.” The new act would add language to the statute clarifying that a mobile application constitutes an “online service.” It would also define “mobile application.” The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) currently interprets “online service” to include mobile apps.

Adding “precise geolocation information” and “biometric information” to the enumerated types of personal information protected under COPPA

COPPA defines “personal information” as “individually identifiable information about an individual collected online” and includes a non-exhaustive list of examples. The bill would add “precise geolocation information” and “biometric information” to this list.

In its implementing regulations, the FTC defines personal information to include “[g]eolocation information sufficient to identify street name and name of a city or town.” The PROTECT Kids Act would broaden this category—it defines “precise geolocation information” as “historical or real-time location information, or inferences drawn from other information, capable of identifying the location of an individual or a consumer device of an individual with specificity sufficient to identify street level location information or an individual’s or device’s location within a range of 1,650 feet or less.”

The term “biometric information” is not currently used in COPPA or its implementing regulations. The bill would define “biometric information” as “the record of any unique, immutable biological attribute or measurement generated by automatic measurements of a consumer’s biological characteristics, including fingerprints, genetic information, iris or retina patterns, facial characteristics, or hand geometry, that are used to uniquely and durably authenticate the identity of a consumer when such consumer accesses a physical location, device, system, or account.”

Prohibiting operators from terminating services to a child whose parent has requested deletion or refused further collection of the child’s personal information

Under current law, operators are permitted to terminate services to a child whose parent or guardian has directed the operator to delete the child’s personal information or refused to permit further use or collection of the personal information, provided that operators cannot condition a child’s participation in an activity on the child disclosing more personal information than is reasonably necessary. The PROTECT Kids Act would prohibit operators from terminating services to a child whose parent or guardian has requested deletion or refused further use or collection of the child’s personal information.

Adding language that requires operators to delete a child’s personal information upon request from a parent

COPPA regulations require operators to provide parents and guardians the “opportunity at any time to refuse to permit the operator’s further use or future online collection of personal information from that child, and to direct the operator to delete the child’s personal information.” The PROTECT Kids Act would add language stating that operators must delete a child’s personal information upon request from a parent or guardian.

The legislation would also direct the FTC to study and make recommendations to Congress regarding COPPA’s “actual knowledge” standard. COPPA imposes requirements on operators of websites or online services directed to a general audience if the operators have “actual knowledge” that they are collecting, using or disclosing personal information from children under 13. Whether this “actual knowledge” standard is too high to adequately protect children has been much debated by stakeholders and was a key topic of conversation at the FTC’s recent workshop on potential updates to COPPA regulations.

The PROTECT Kids Act reflects continued interest in the regulation of children’s online privacy. In November, Representatives Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Ben McAdams (D-UT) introduced a congressional resolution that calls on the technology industry to develop a self-regulatory body to protect children from harmful app content. As the 116th Congress enters its second and final session, additional legislation regarding children’s online privacy may be introduced in the coming weeks.

The FTC is also in the process of reviewing its regulations implementing COPPA. It recently concluded collecting public comments regarding, among other topics, potential updates to the parental right to review or delete children’s information, and whether there are circumstances in which general audience platforms with third-party child-directed content can rebut the assumption that all users interacting with that content are children. We continue to monitor the FTC’s regulatory process on this topic.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

Data Dive

June 11, 2024

In May, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued updated recommendations for security controls for controlled unclassified information (CUI) that is processed, stored or transmitted by nonfederal organizations using nonfederal systems, (NIST Special Publication 800-171 (SP 800-171), Revision 3). These security requirements are “intended for use by federal agencies in contractual vehicles or other agreements that are established between those agencies and nonfederal organizations.”1 While these new controls are only applicable to nonfederal entities that agree to comply with the new issuance, Revision 3 signals the next phase of expected security for government contractors.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.