China Issues New Cybersecurity Review Measures

Jun 4, 2020

Reading Time : 3 min

Subjects and Applicants of the Cybersecurity Review:

Where the purchase of network products and services by an operator of critical information infrastructures (the “CII operator”) influences or may influence state security, a cybersecurity review shall be conducted pursuant to Article 2 of the Review Measures. According to the FAQ of the Review Measures (find the FAQ here in Chinese), the CII operator includes the operators of important networks and information systems in the fields of telecommunications, radio and television, energy, finance, road and water transportation, railways, civil aviation, postal services, water conservancy, emergency management, health and wellness, social security, defense technology industry, etc. According to Article 20 of the Review Measures, the governmental department for the protection of critical information infrastructures will finally identify the CII operator.

When purchasing network products or services, the CII operator shall consider whether potential state security risks may arise after the use of such products or services. If the state security can be affected or may be affected, the CII operator shall declare the procurement to the cybersecurity review office to conduct a cybersecurity review. The pre-judgment guideline for the CII operators may be formulated by the department for the protection of critical information infrastructures, and before the issuance of the pre-judgment guideline, the CII operator may at least consider the primary elements listed in Article 9 of the Review Measures for the cybersecurity review (details as provided below).

Additionally, the cybersecurity review office can conduct a review on the network products or services if the review office is concerned that they can influence or may influence state security, after getting the approval of the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission.

The Scope of the Cybersecurity Review:

According to Article 20 of the Review Measures, the “network products and services” mainly refer to core network equipment, high-performance computers and servers, mass storage equipment, large databases and applications, network security equipment, cloud computing services and other network products and services that have an important impact on the security of critical information infrastructures.

Main Factors of the Cybersecurity Review:

According to Article 9 of the Review Measures, the state security risk will be the primary focus during a cybersecurity review, and the following factors are taken into consideration during the review:

(1) The risk of illegal control, interference or destruction of critical information infrastructures and the theft, leakage or destruction of important data that arises due to the use of the products or services.

(2) The harm caused by the disruption of the supply of products or services to the operation continuity of critical information infrastructures.

(3) The risk of the security, openness, transparency and diversity of sources of the products or services, the risk of the reliability of supply channels, as well as the risk of supply interruption due to politics, diplomacy, trade, etc.

(4) The compliance situations of the provider of products or services with Chinese laws, administrative regulations and departmental rules.

(5) Other factors which may endanger the safety of critical information infrastructures and state security.

Requirements on Relevant Contract Clauses:

According to Article 6 of the Review Measures, for procurement activities that are filed for the cybersecurity review, the relevant CII operator shall request the product and/or service providers to cooperate with the cybersecurity review, for example, committing to not illegally obtain user data and control or illegally operate user’s equipment, and to not interrupt supply or technical support service without justified reasons.

Timeline of the Cybersecurity Review:

The cybersecurity review office shall complete the preliminary review and send review conclusions and suggestions to the member authorities of the cybersecurity review mechanism and the relevant key information infrastructure protection government agencies (the “other related authorities”) within 30 working days from the date of issuing the written notice to the CII operator, and the review time may be extended by 15 working days if the situation is complicated.

The other related authorities shall provide their opinions in writing within 15 working days after they receive the review conclusions and suggestions from the cybersecurity review office. If the other related authorities reach a consensus, the cybersecurity review office will send the review conclusions to the CII operator in writing; if no consensus is reached, the office will notify the CII operator and review the case under a special review procedure. This special review procedure has not been issued with the Review Measures, which may be issued by the related governmental authority later or only established as an internal undisclosed review procedure of the review office.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.