Department of Commerce Seeking Comments on Export Controls for Surveillance Products, Software and Technologies

Jul 20, 2020

Reading Time : 2 min

BIS controls the export and reexport of certain crime control and detection items and their related components, technology and software under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) Commerce Control List (CCL). Current license requirements and CCL designations subject to these requirements are set forth in 15 C.F.R. § 742.7, which notes that BIS will generally consider license applications favorably absent evidence that the importing country is engaged in human rights violations.

Accordingly, BIS is examining these controls out of concern that these items are being used by foreign governments and others to engage in mass surveillance, censorship, privacy violations or to otherwise facilitate the abuse of human rights around the world, particularly with respect to minority religious groups in China. In particular, BIS notes that facial recognition technology and surveillance cameras have been installed approximately every hundred meters in several Chinese cities, with additional checkpoints in common gathering areas. BIS also notes that biometric systems can be used to identify and track individuals without their cooperation, consent or even awareness. Similarly, BIS notes that voice print identification systems can be used to identify persons of interest in criminal investigations.

BIS seeks comments on whether controls on items already designated under the CCL should be modified, including:

  • Fingerprint readers
  • Voice print identification systems
  • Polygraph equipment
  • Components, software and technology for the above items.

Items of particular interest for new export and reexport license requirements by BIS include:

  • Facial recognition software and other biometric systems for surveillance
  • Nonlethal visual disruption lasers
  • Long-range acoustic devices
  • Components, software and technology for the above items.

BIS notes that many of these items are currently designated only as EAR99 as they are not elsewhere listed in the CCL. Therefore these items frequently do not require a license for export except if sent to an embargoed country, to an end-user of concern or in support of a prohibited end-use.

In considering adding or amending the controls, BIS particularly seeks public input on how consumer or commercial applications of these items might be distinguished from law enforcement or security applications, the impact that new or modified controls would have on United States support of human rights, as well as the impact that new or modified controls would have on the competitiveness of U.S. business and industry. For some of the identified items, BIS has also suggested possible new Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs) it could adopt, or restrictions that it could apply instead on an end-user basis. BIS also seeks comment on the appropriateness of these proposals.

The deadline for comments is Sept. 15. Comments may be submitted to Docket BIS-2020-0021 on regulations.gov

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

Data Dive

June 11, 2024

In May, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued updated recommendations for security controls for controlled unclassified information (CUI) that is processed, stored or transmitted by nonfederal organizations using nonfederal systems, (NIST Special Publication 800-171 (SP 800-171), Revision 3). These security requirements are “intended for use by federal agencies in contractual vehicles or other agreements that are established between those agencies and nonfederal organizations.”1 While these new controls are only applicable to nonfederal entities that agree to comply with the new issuance, Revision 3 signals the next phase of expected security for government contractors.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.