DIFC Issues Landmark Adequacy Decision Regarding the California Consumer Privacy Act

August 16, 2023

Reading Time : 2 min

On August 7, 2023, the Commissioner of Data Protection of the Dubai International Financial Centre (the DIFC), a financial free-zone in the United Arab Emirates, issued the first adequacy decision regarding the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020, the CCPA), recognizing the essential equivalence of the CCPA with the DIFC Data Protection Law (DIFC Law No. 5 of 2020, as amended the DIFC DPL). Importantly, the issuance of the decision helps to facilitate the transfer of data between the DIFC and entities based in California in accordance with the DIFC DPL without requiring such entities to apply additional contractual measures. Furthermore, the Commissioner’s press release expressly notes that the issuance of the adequacy decision may serve as a precedent for the DIFC establishing a similar relationship with other U.S. states. California is now one of 49 countries, jurisdictions or organizations subject to an adequacy decision by the DIFC (the full list can be found here).

The issuance of the adequacy decision involved an assessment by the Commissioner of California’s data protection regime through a review of California’s laws and regulations that included the CCPA as well as other laws and regulations with privacy features at the state and federal level. The assessment included, but was not limited to, consideration of the grounds for lawful and fair processing, the existence of data protection principles and data subjects’ rights, international and onward data transfer restrictions, measures regarding security of processing and breach reporting and accountability. In its 32-page adequacy decision, the Commissioner outlined nine key observations regarding the California data protection landscape, setting out a detailed assessment underpinning the basis of its adequacy decision. For example, the Commissioner pointed to the fact (i) the CCPA sets out various data subject rights, key obligations on businesses and lawful grounds for processing personal data, (ii) the California Offices of the Attorney General have taken “extensive measures” to investigate compliance with the CCPA and (iii) the California Privacy Protection Agency is a member of the Global Privacy Assembly and Global Privacy Enforcement Network, both of which are organizations where the DIFC Commissioner’s Office is also a member.

The adequacy decision expressly notes, however, that the CCPA does not have a provision dedicated to the transfer of personal information outside of California or the United States. As such, the adequacy decision requires that DIFC exporters that send personal data to a California-based importer under the adequacy decision would need to ensure that the onward transfer of such personal data is safeguarded. In addition, the Commissioner recommends that the decision be reviewed and reconfirmed annually where appropriate and further confirms that the Commissioner may amend or suspend the decision at any time.

We continue to monitor developments in this area. Please do reach out to any member of the team to discuss the implications of the adequacy decision for your business further.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.