Fourth Proposed Modifications to CCPA Regulations Clarify Opt-Out Requirements

Dec 15, 2020

Reading Time : 3 min

Businesses that sell personal information collected in the course of interacting with California residents should take note of the following proposed changes:

  • Opt-Out Notifications for Consumers Whose Information is Collected Offline. Under the CCPA Regulations, businesses that sell consumer personal information are required to notify consumers of their rights to opt out of such sales. Businesses that collect information about consumers through offline interactions struggle with how to satisfy this requirement. The proposed revisions to Section 999.306(b)(3) of the CCPA Regulations attempt to clarify the confusion by specifying that businesses may provide such offline notices to consumers by the same offline means they use to collect consumer information, as illustrated in the Proposed Modifications by the following examples:
    • Businesses that sell personal information collected from California consumers in brick-and-mortar stores would have the option to provide notice of opt-out rights on the paperwork used to collect such information or on signage posted in the area where the information is collected.
    • Businesses that sell personal information collected from California consumers via telephone would have the option to inform consumers of their opt-out rights orally during the call in which the information is collected.
  • Addition of Opt-Out Button for Online Notices. The CCPA Regulations require businesses that sell personal information collected from California consumers online to provide online opt-out notices to California residents. To facilitate online notices, the modifications propose adding Section 999.306(f) to the CCPA Regulations, which would give businesses the option to add an “opt-out button” on their websites for consumers to indicate that they do not wish to have their personal information sold. It is important to note, however, that the addition of an opt-out button would not, on its own, fulfill the online notice requirements. Instead, opt-out buttons would function as an additional tool to facilitate consumer awareness and exercise of the right to opt out. Under the Proposed Modifications, opt-out buttons must be the same size as the other buttons on the business’s website and must meet the following requirements:
    • The opt-out button must look exactly like the image here.
    • If a business posts a “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” link on its website, the opt-out button must appear on the left side of the text, as depicted here.
  • Guidance on Ease of Access Requirements for Opt-out Requests. While one of the recurring themes in the CCPA Regulations is ease of consumer access to data privacy options, a lack of clear guidance on what constitutes ease of access has led to differing interpretations of the rules. To address this issue with respect to opt-out requests, the modifications propose adding Section 999.315(h) to the CCPA Regulations, which would expand upon the “ease of use” requirement of Section 999.315(b) by specifying that access to opt-out requests should require “minimal steps,” and would explicitly ban specific methods designed to thwart access to opt-out requests. Under proposed Section 999.315(h), a business’s opt-out request process must NOT:
    • Require more steps to opt out than it would take a consumer to opt back in to the sale of the consumer’s information after having opted out.
    • Use confusing language or double-negatives (i.e., “Don’t Not Sell My Personal Information”).
    • Require consumers to click through or listen to reasons why they should not opt out.
    • Require consumers to provide personal information beyond the information necessary to implement the request.
    • Require consumers to search or scroll through a privacy policy or webpage to locate the opt-out mechanism after clicking the “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” link.

The future of the CCPA Regulations remains uncertain and will depend in large part on the comments the OAG receives to the Proposed Modifications. Given the likelihood of future proposed changes, businesses should closely monitor the CCPA rulemaking activities page on the OAG’s website, which sets out the current status of the CCPA Regulations and provides up-to-date information about the latest developments. 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information. In the context of a fund finance transaction, this due diligence is likely to include a review of fund organizational documents, subscription agreements and side letters, if any, from the fund’s investors. Providing this information to lenders is an essential and practical aspect of incurring any fund-level financing, and is often expressly permitted by a fund’s governing documentation. Especially in the context of a subscription credit facility, where investor commitments and the related right to collect capital contributions are the primary source of repayment for the loan, a lender will need to see information that could potentially include sensitive or confidential information about investors.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

Data Dive

June 11, 2024

In May, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued updated recommendations for security controls for controlled unclassified information (CUI) that is processed, stored or transmitted by nonfederal organizations using nonfederal systems, (NIST Special Publication 800-171 (SP 800-171), Revision 3). These security requirements are “intended for use by federal agencies in contractual vehicles or other agreements that are established between those agencies and nonfederal organizations.”1 While these new controls are only applicable to nonfederal entities that agree to comply with the new issuance, Revision 3 signals the next phase of expected security for government contractors.

...

Read More

Data Dive

May 31, 2024

On May 21, 2024, the European Union finalized the adoption of the groundbreaking EU Artificial Intelligence Act, a comprehensive and sector-agnostic legislation that extends globally. This 420-page Act aims to regulate the deployment and development of AI systems, categorizing them into high-risk and low-risk, and even banning certain types of AI. The Act emphasizes trust, transparency, and accountability in AI usage, promoting the safe integration of AI technologies. This legislation sets a potential global benchmark for AI regulation, although its complexity may pose interpretative and implementation challenges for stakeholders. We set out the key provisions below.

...

Read More

Data Dive

May 30, 2024

On May 17, 2024, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed into law S.B. 205, a pioneering piece of legislation aimed at regulating high-risk AI systems. This new law, set to take effect on February 1, 2026, introduces stringent requirements for AI developers and deployers, focusing on risk management and the prevention of algorithmic discrimination. This legislation marks a significant step in state-level AI regulation, potentially setting a precedent similar to the impact of GDPR on privacy laws.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.