Maine Law Will Place Strict Restrictions on Internet Service Providers

Oct 28, 2019

Reading Time : 2 min

The Act applies to ISPs serving customers “that are physically located and billed for service received” in Maine. It does not apply to other internet actors that collect customers’ information, such as social media networks and search engines.

The Act forbids ISPs from using, disclosing, selling or permitting access to personally identifying customer information, including:

  • Web browsing and application usage history.
  • Precise geolocation information.
  • Financial and health information.
  • Information about the customers’ children.
  • Device identifiers.
  • The content of the customer’s communications.
  • Origin and destination IP addresses.

ISPs also must provide a “clear, conspicuous and nondeceptive notice” of their obligations and of customers’ rights under the Act.

The Act also sets a “reasonable security” requirement. Specifically, an ISP must take “reasonable measures” to protect a customer’s personal information from unauthorized use, disclosure or access. This requirement is similar to other “reasonable security”-type obligations imposed under other state laws like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). The ISP is directed to take into account the following factors when implementing the required security measures: the nature and scope of the provider’s activities, the sensitivity of the data the provider collects, the size of the provider and the technical feasibility of the security measures.

There are only a few limited exceptions to these restrictions. Notably, only affirmative “opt-in” consent qualifies as an exception, a departure from similar laws that allow for “opt-out” consent. This means that in Maine, all ISP customers will be protected without any action on their part. ISPs are prohibited from incentivizing customers to opt-in, or penalizing those customers that do not. A customer may revoke his or her consent at any time. Other exceptions exist to facilitate compliance with a lawful court order; to provide service to the customer, including billing and collecting payment; to market and advertise ISP services; to protect users from fraud; and to provide geolocation information in emergency circumstances.

There is no explicit enforcement provision in the Act. The Maine Legislature proposed an amendment that would have placed enforcement authority with the Office of the Maine Attorney General and authorized funds to hire enforcement staff. That amendment failed to pass this year. Because the Act will be incorporated into the Maine statute title concerning public utilities, it is possible that the Maine Public Utilities Commission will enforce the Act. It is also possible that Maine courts could read the Act to create a private cause of action for Maine citizens. It thus remains an open question how the Act will be enforced and by whom.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

March 3, 2025

On January 16, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule updating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection (COPPA) Rule, significantly expanding compliance obligations for online services that collect, use, or disclose personal information from children under 13.1 The amendments impose new restrictions on targeted advertising, add data security requirements, refine parental consent mechanisms, and introduce additional compliance measures.

...

Read More

Data Dive

February 21, 2025

On January 8, 2025, the DOJ published a final rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 22, 2025

On January 17, 2025, days before the inauguration, former President Joe Biden issued an executive order titled Strengthening and Promoting Innovation in the Nation's Cybersecurity (EO 14144). Building on previous efforts, including Executive Order 14028, this directive seeks to bolster cybersecurity across federal systems, supply chains and critical infrastructure from adversarial nations, particularly from the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 10, 2025

UPDATE: The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has extended the deadline for submitting public comments from January 14 to February 19, 2025, in response to the recent California wildfires. This extension aims to afford stakeholders additional time to provide comprehensive and detailed feedback, considering the significant challenges posed by the wildfires.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 25, 2024

Treasury has issued a Final Rule to implement President Biden’s 2023 EO targeting U.S. investments in Chinese companies engaged in certain activities related to semiconductors, quantum computing or AI.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.