OFAC Releases Advisory on Sanctions Risk Involving Ransomware Payments

Oct 30, 2020

Reading Time : 2 min

By: Natasha G. Kohne, Mahmoud (Mac) Fadlallah, Rebecca Kocsis (Legal Project Analyst)

Sanctions risk are present in ransomware attacks because hackers behind these attacks may often be sanctioned parties or acting on behalf of sanctioned parties or governments. In such cases, companies and individuals who pay ransomware payments may be unknowingly dealing with sanctioned parties and, because U.S. sanctions laws apply on a strict liability basis, would be liable for substantial penalties for such dealings. Advisories such as the one OFAC issued here often foreshadow an uptick in OFAC enforcement in a particular area.

Exacerbating these risks is the fact that ransomware attacks have become more prevalent in recent years, and have become more focused, sophisticated and costly. The OFAC’s advisory cited a 147 percent annual increase in ransomware losses from 2018 to 2019. Even more alarming, a recent report shows that payment of ransomware attacks has risen from 45 percent in 2019 to 58 percent in early 20201. The rise in payments has emboldened the ransomware industry, and encourages future ransomware payment demands from malicious actors.

In a joint cybersecurity alert on October 28, 2020, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), FBI and the Department of Health and Human Services issued a joint alert about a credible ransomware threat against 400 U.S. hospitals. And while ransomware attacks on large companies have made national headlines in recent months, many ransomware attacks are also carried out against small- to mid-sized businesses and local government agencies. These small- to mid-sized businesses and governments may be even more vulnerable to ransomware attacks, as they lack the resources to properly invest in cyber protection and prevention. Since the ransomware attacks are designed to block access to data or computer systems, smaller companies might be more inclined to quickly pay the ransomware request to gain access to their systems.

It is essential that all businesses understand that facilitating these payments may make them more susceptible to sanctions by providing financial support to individuals that have been designated as malicious cyber actors. Businesses should also be aware that payment does not guarantee that the victim will regain access to the stolen material. OFAC also strongly encourages businesses of all sizes to implement a strong, risk-based compliance program that will help mitigate and prevent exposure to ransomware- and sanctions-related violations. OFAC also asked all victims and parties involved with responding to a ransomware attack to contact OFAC immediately if they suspect that payment would involve a sanctions nexus.

If you have any questions about your company’s obligations and compliance efforts, please contact a member of the Akin Gump Cybersecurity, Privacy and Data Protection team.


1 CyberEdge’s Cyberthreat Defense Report, March 31, 2020

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

Data Dive

June 11, 2024

In May, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued updated recommendations for security controls for controlled unclassified information (CUI) that is processed, stored or transmitted by nonfederal organizations using nonfederal systems, (NIST Special Publication 800-171 (SP 800-171), Revision 3). These security requirements are “intended for use by federal agencies in contractual vehicles or other agreements that are established between those agencies and nonfederal organizations.”1 While these new controls are only applicable to nonfederal entities that agree to comply with the new issuance, Revision 3 signals the next phase of expected security for government contractors.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.