Privacy Activists Pushing a New California Ballot Initiative to Adopt a More Onerous Version of the CCPA

Sep 25, 2019

Reading Time : 2 min

The Attorney General’s Office will accept public comment on the draft initiative until October 25, 2019. Comments can be submitted here.

Under the California Constitution, citizens have the power to adopt or repeal laws and constitutional amendments without the approval of the governor or the Legislature via a statewide ballot initiative. To qualify such measures for the ballot, proponents are required to gather 997,139 valid signatures of voters. In 2018, Mactaggart and his group qualified a similar ballot initiative that would have adopted a more onerous version of the CCPA.  He ultimately withdrew his prior proposed ballot initiative after legislators agreed to pass the CCPA. This time, Mactaggart has suggested that he is planning to push forward with a ballot initiative.

If successful, the ballot initiative could result in a new privacy law that the Legislature would have limited power to amend. This would mean limited tweaks or practical revisions to assist with implementation. In a world where technology is rapidly changing, passage of such a measure could lock in place terms, definitions, rules and policies that could quickly become outdated without an easy way to update.

Mactaggart and his allies have included provisions that would address issues like the following, among others:

  • A two-tiered definition of personal information that offers more consumer control over “sensitive personal information” than over general “personal information.” This new category would include things like data regarding a person’s race, health or recent location (via GPS technology).
  • An opt-in requirement for the collection of any data on children younger than 16. The CCPA currently requires that children or their guardians (depending on age) opt-in to the sale of children’s personal information.
  • New rights for consumers, including the right to opt-in to the sale of “sensitive personal information,” the right to opt-out of the use of “sensitive personal information” for advertising and marketing, and the right to correct inaccurate personal information.
  • The creation of a new state agency, the California Privacy Protection Agency, to deal with privacy issues, including fielding complaints and enforcing the CCPA. This would relieve the Attorney General’s Office of its burden of CCPA enforcement, something the Office has said it is ill-equipped to handle with its current resources.
  • Force companies to release information on the algorithms used to target or profile customers, particularly with regard to targeted advertisements. It is not clear if there would be protections for trade secrets and similar intellectual property.

We will continue to monitor this effort closely. The initiative is sure to affect companies across industries and across the world, given the size of the California market.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

Data Dive

June 11, 2024

In May, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued updated recommendations for security controls for controlled unclassified information (CUI) that is processed, stored or transmitted by nonfederal organizations using nonfederal systems, (NIST Special Publication 800-171 (SP 800-171), Revision 3). These security requirements are “intended for use by federal agencies in contractual vehicles or other agreements that are established between those agencies and nonfederal organizations.”1 While these new controls are only applicable to nonfederal entities that agree to comply with the new issuance, Revision 3 signals the next phase of expected security for government contractors.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.