Senate Commerce Committee Hears Testimony on EU-US Privacy Shield

Dec 10, 2020

Reading Time : 1 min

The hearing included testimony from James Sullivan, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services at the International Trade Administration (ITA), who indicated that all teams in the ITA’s Office of Digital Services Industries have met, on multiple occasions, with members of the Biden-Harris transition team, and have prepared a transition memorandum on the state of play around the Privacy Shield. Peter Swire of the Cross-Border Data Forum emphasized the need to negotiate a short-term deal, potentially for one year, before January 20, that would expire and meet the goals of both the EU and U.S.

Members also emphasized the need to assess how a comprehensive federal privacy law could assist efforts to develop a successor data transfer framework. Given California’s passage of Proposition 24, the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (CPRA) ballot initiative, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) expressed optimism that the 117th Congress can make “significant progress” on privacy. Ranking Member Cantwell expressed commitment to resolving issues between her and Chairman Wicker’s own privacy proposals next year.

Members on both sides of the aisle, such as Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Gary Peters (D-MI), expressed concern that elimination of the Privacy Shield could result in the global adoption of data localization. Moving forward, there was general consensus among Members and witnesses that the U.S. must work towards a long-term goal of addressing underlying intelligence gathering issues and work toward building consensus among like-minded countries.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

March 3, 2025

On January 16, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule updating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection (COPPA) Rule, significantly
expanding compliance obligations for online services that collect, use, or disclose personal information from children under 13.1 The amendments impose
new restrictions on targeted advertising, add data security requirements, refine parental consent mechanisms, and introduce additional compliance
measures.
...

Read More

Data Dive

February 21, 2025

On January 8, 2025, the DOJ published a final rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as
China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).
...

Read More

Data Dive

January 22, 2025

On January 17, 2025, days before the inauguration, former President Joe Biden issued an executive order titled Strengthening and Promoting Innovation in
the Nation's Cybersecurity (EO 14144). Building on previous efforts, including Executive Order 14028, this directive seeks to bolster cybersecurity across
federal systems, supply chains and critical infrastructure from adversarial nations, particularly from the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
...

Read More

Data Dive

January 10, 2025

UPDATE: The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has extended the deadline for submitting public comments from January 14 to February 19, 2025, in
response to the recent California wildfires. This extension aims to afford stakeholders additional time to provide comprehensive and detailed feedback,
considering the significant challenges posed by the wildfires.
...

Read More

Data Dive

November 25, 2024

Treasury has issued a Final Rule to implement President Biden’s 2023 EO targeting U.S. investments in Chinese companies engaged in certain activities
related to semiconductors, quantum computing or AI.
...

Read More

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers
of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both
forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the
Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation
period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially
reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.
...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such
as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).
...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant
“know-your-customer” information.
...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.