Tech Groups Pitch Priorities for WTO E-Commerce Trade Talks

Oct 18, 2019

Reading Time : 2 min

The associations, who collectively represented tech interests from Asia, Australia, Europe, Japan, Nigeria, the United Kingdom and the United States, released a position paper highlighting 13 priority subject areas for the agreement. There are currently no specific multilateral rules governing electronic commerce, with traders largely relying on a patchwork of rules created by bilateral and regional free trade agreements. Therefore, the associations’ priority areas for a new global trade regulatory regime for e-commerce include:

  1. Enacting a permanent prohibition on tariffs and customs charges on electronic goods, a policy currently prohibited by WTO members only by a resolution that must be reapproved bi-annually.
  2. Facilitating cross-border data flows.
  3. Prohibiting localization requirements on data processing and storage.
  4. Ensuring adequate protection of personal data.
  5. Prohibiting requirements to disclose source code, algorithms or encryption keys.
  6. Promoting government regulatory cooperation and risk-based approaches to cybersecurity.
  7. Promoting good regulatory practices for digital services.
  8. Pursuing provisions that facilitate trade, such as increased de minimis levels and simpler customs procedures for small shipments.
  9. Promoting the acceptance of electronic contracts, signatures and authentication.
  10. Limiting legal liability (outside the area of intellectual property) for internet services and other intermediaries who host user-generated content.
  11. Expanding market access commitments for services.
  12. Expand market access commitments for information and communication technology (ICT) goods.
  13. Encouraging technological development by facilitating access to and use of open, machine-readable government data.

Eighty WTO members are currently engaging in the plurilateral e-commerce negotiations, which began in January 2019 among a smaller group of members. Since then, these members have met to discuss areas for negotiation and the desired scope of any final agreement, which is expected to cover many of the topics addressed by the technology associations’ position paper.

Progress has remained steady, but slow. In September, members discussed the largely non-controversial topics of e-signatures, contracts and invoicing. Negotiators plan to begin discussing the more controversial topics, including privacy, data localization, cross-border transfers and the moratorium on e-commerce duties in October and November 2019.

Substantive disagreements have arisen between the three largest economies involved in the talks—the United States, the European Union and China—on several key topics. For example, the United States and European Union have been unable to agree on the proper framework for privacy protection. China, meanwhile, does not want the agreement to address cross-border data flows or data localization and has introduced text that would require signatories to grant equal market access to its information and communications technology products.

Due to the WTO’s consensus-based approach to negotiations, many believe that achieving an ambitious E-Commerce Agreement will be difficult if China continues to be involved. Alternatively, members could significantly narrow the scope of the deal to attract the broadest possible support.

While members originally hoped for preliminary outcomes in the talks before the WTO’s June 2020 Ministerial Conference, significant developments are no longer expected at that time.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

Data Dive

June 11, 2024

In May, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued updated recommendations for security controls for controlled unclassified information (CUI) that is processed, stored or transmitted by nonfederal organizations using nonfederal systems, (NIST Special Publication 800-171 (SP 800-171), Revision 3). These security requirements are “intended for use by federal agencies in contractual vehicles or other agreements that are established between those agencies and nonfederal organizations.”1 While these new controls are only applicable to nonfederal entities that agree to comply with the new issuance, Revision 3 signals the next phase of expected security for government contractors.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.