Tech Groups Pitch Priorities for WTO E-Commerce Trade Talks

Oct 18, 2019

Reading Time : 2 min

The associations, who collectively represented tech interests from Asia, Australia, Europe, Japan, Nigeria, the United Kingdom and the United States, released a position paper highlighting 13 priority subject areas for the agreement. There are currently no specific multilateral rules governing electronic commerce, with traders largely relying on a patchwork of rules created by bilateral and regional free trade agreements. Therefore, the associations’ priority areas for a new global trade regulatory regime for e-commerce include:

  1. Enacting a permanent prohibition on tariffs and customs charges on electronic goods, a policy currently prohibited by WTO members only by a resolution that must be reapproved bi-annually.
  2. Facilitating cross-border data flows.
  3. Prohibiting localization requirements on data processing and storage.
  4. Ensuring adequate protection of personal data.
  5. Prohibiting requirements to disclose source code, algorithms or encryption keys.
  6. Promoting government regulatory cooperation and risk-based approaches to cybersecurity.
  7. Promoting good regulatory practices for digital services.
  8. Pursuing provisions that facilitate trade, such as increased de minimis levels and simpler customs procedures for small shipments.
  9. Promoting the acceptance of electronic contracts, signatures and authentication.
  10. Limiting legal liability (outside the area of intellectual property) for internet services and other intermediaries who host user-generated content.
  11. Expanding market access commitments for services.
  12. Expand market access commitments for information and communication technology (ICT) goods.
  13. Encouraging technological development by facilitating access to and use of open, machine-readable government data.

Eighty WTO members are currently engaging in the plurilateral e-commerce negotiations, which began in January 2019 among a smaller group of members. Since then, these members have met to discuss areas for negotiation and the desired scope of any final agreement, which is expected to cover many of the topics addressed by the technology associations’ position paper.

Progress has remained steady, but slow. In September, members discussed the largely non-controversial topics of e-signatures, contracts and invoicing. Negotiators plan to begin discussing the more controversial topics, including privacy, data localization, cross-border transfers and the moratorium on e-commerce duties in October and November 2019.

Substantive disagreements have arisen between the three largest economies involved in the talks—the United States, the European Union and China—on several key topics. For example, the United States and European Union have been unable to agree on the proper framework for privacy protection. China, meanwhile, does not want the agreement to address cross-border data flows or data localization and has introduced text that would require signatories to grant equal market access to its information and communications technology products.

Due to the WTO’s consensus-based approach to negotiations, many believe that achieving an ambitious E-Commerce Agreement will be difficult if China continues to be involved. Alternatively, members could significantly narrow the scope of the deal to attract the broadest possible support.

While members originally hoped for preliminary outcomes in the talks before the WTO’s June 2020 Ministerial Conference, significant developments are no longer expected at that time.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

March 3, 2025

On January 16, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule updating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection (COPPA) Rule, significantly expanding compliance obligations for online services that collect, use, or disclose personal information from children under 13.1 The amendments impose new restrictions on targeted advertising, add data security requirements, refine parental consent mechanisms, and introduce additional compliance measures.

...

Read More

Data Dive

February 21, 2025

On January 8, 2025, the DOJ published a final rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 22, 2025

On January 17, 2025, days before the inauguration, former President Joe Biden issued an executive order titled Strengthening and Promoting Innovation in the Nation's Cybersecurity (EO 14144). Building on previous efforts, including Executive Order 14028, this directive seeks to bolster cybersecurity across federal systems, supply chains and critical infrastructure from adversarial nations, particularly from the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 10, 2025

UPDATE: The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has extended the deadline for submitting public comments from January 14 to February 19, 2025, in response to the recent California wildfires. This extension aims to afford stakeholders additional time to provide comprehensive and detailed feedback, considering the significant challenges posed by the wildfires.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 25, 2024

Treasury has issued a Final Rule to implement President Biden’s 2023 EO targeting U.S. investments in Chinese companies engaged in certain activities related to semiconductors, quantum computing or AI.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.