U.S. Chamber’s AI Principles Latest Industry Effort to Push Policy

Oct 1, 2019

Reading Time : 2 min

By: Ed Pagano, Hans Christopher Rickhoff, Lamar Smith, Christina Barone (Public Policy Specialist)

The Principles include:

  • Recognize Trustworthy AI is a Partnership. Governments should collaborate with the private sector, academia, and civil society to ensure AI technologies encompass trustworthy values such as transparency, explainability, fairness and accountability.
  • Be Mindful of Existing Rules and Regulations. Policymakers should consider removing or modifying regulations that hinder AI’s development, deployment and use. Also, governments should implement comprehensive and interoperable practices and avoid creating a patchwork of AI policies.
  • Adopt Risk-Based Approaches to AI Governance. Governments should incorporate flexible risk-based approaches based on use cases rather than prescriptive requirements when governing the use of AI technologies.
  • Support Private and Public Investment in AI Research and Development. Governments should encourage and incentivize robust investments in research and development by collaborating directly with cross-border businesses, universities and institutions.
  • Build an AI-Ready Workforce. Governments should collaborate with industry stakeholders to build and retain a diverse global workforce suited for an AI economy to ensure that workers are prepared to use AI tools and adapt to changing workforce needs.
  • Promote Open and Accessible Government Data. Governments at all levels should improve the quality and usability of its robust data sets through, as an example, greater digitization, standardized documentation and formatting and additional budgetary resources.
  • Pursue Robust and Flexible Privacy Regimes. Governments should pursue robust but flexible data protection regimes that enable the collection, retention and processing of data for AI development, deployment and use while preserving consumer privacy rights.
  • Advance Intellectual Property Frameworks that Protect and Promote Innovation. Governments must work to protect and enforce intellectual property for AI and support an innovation-oriented approach that recognizes the strengths of an open AI ecosystem.
  • Commit to Cross-Border Data Flows. Governments should commit to international border data-flow to boost AI-related investment and innovation to increase access to AI technologies.
  • Abide by International Standards. Policymakers should acknowledge and support the development of industry-led and consensus-based standards in recognized international standards bodies and consortia to facilitate the use and adoption of AI technologies.

As noted above, the Principles are just the latest sign that AI policy concerns stretch across industries. The Akin Gump cross-practice AI team continues to actively monitor forthcoming administrative, congressional and private stakeholder initiatives related to AI.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

Data Dive

June 11, 2024

In May, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued updated recommendations for security controls for controlled unclassified information (CUI) that is processed, stored or transmitted by nonfederal organizations using nonfederal systems, (NIST Special Publication 800-171 (SP 800-171), Revision 3). These security requirements are “intended for use by federal agencies in contractual vehicles or other agreements that are established between those agencies and nonfederal organizations.”1 While these new controls are only applicable to nonfederal entities that agree to comply with the new issuance, Revision 3 signals the next phase of expected security for government contractors.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.