Utah Updates Consumer Privacy and Protection Acts with AI-Focused Provisions

May 8, 2024

Reading Time : 3 min

Effective May 1, 2024, companies must face new artificial intelligence (AI) disclosure requirements in Utah. The Utah AI Policy Act (AI Act) amends the Utah Consumer Privacy Act (UCPA) and Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (UCSPA) to address consumer-related AI.

Generated Data to Protect Privacy

The AI Act provides a specific exclusion for a special type of generated data—synthetic data—allowing companies to broadly use data that was not previously excluded from the definition of personal data under Utah’s comprehensive privacy statute. Synthetic data is artificial data that is made by mathematically modeling real data to create new data. The new data preserves the statistical properties of the original data but does not contain the underlying details. As a result, synthetic data is a “step above de-identification” but otherwise shows “no significant difference” from the original data.1 Synthetic data techniques provide the ability to not only recreate data, but also to make additional data with specific properties. Mixing this additional data into a data set can help create better results, such as by mitigating known biases.2

The UCPA definition of “personal data” covers “information that is linked or reasonably linkable to an identified individual or an identifiable individual” and excludes de-identified data, aggregated data or publicly available information.3 Under the new UCPA amendments, synthetic data is defined as “data that has been generated by computer algorithms or statistical models and does not contain personal data” and is explicitly stated to be a form of de-identified data.4 These changes support and align with best practices and provide clear guidance for using synthetic data in Utah.

Transparency and Liability for AI

Further, the bill adds provisions to the UCSPA that address responsibility for consumer protection violations involving generative AI and requires disclosure when consumers are interacting with AI. The amendments clarify that using AI is not a defense to violations, including whether AI performs the act or statement—or the AI is used by a person.5 Accordingly, organizations are responsible for their AI and must take steps to ensure that it remains compliant with Utah’s consumer protection laws.

Under the new amendments, consumer-facing AI must—upon request—clearly and conspicuously disclose that the user is interacting with “generative artificial intelligence and not a human.”6 For regulated occupations, which are defined as those that require a license or state certification, this transparency requirement does not require the consumer to ask—the use of generative AI must be disclosed when providing regulated services.7 Like the other amendments, this transparency requirement is consistent with best practices and many other proposed regulations aimed at providing notice when AI is involved.

Other AI-Related Measures

In addition to amending the UCPA and UCSPA, the bill includes an Artificial Intelligence Policy Act, which creates the Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy and a Learning Laboratory Program to support state regulatory efforts and encourage in-state AI development.8

Utah also enacted a second AI-related bill on the same day. As of May 1, 2024, the second bill requires identifying AI-generated content with both human-observable and “embedded tamper-evident digital” measures (e.g., watermarks, metadata) used in political campaigns or otherwise intended to influence voters.9 The second bill also creates a new aggravating factor under the Utah Criminal Code, which allows judges to consider the intentional or knowing use of AI for material assistance in a criminal offense.10

Key Takeaways

Utah is among the first states to address AI in the context of consumer protection and may set a template that other states follow. By clarifying the status of synthetic data, the amended UCPA provides certainty for organizations to use synthetic data and comply with Utah’s privacy law. Paired with the consumer-facing transparency and liability pieces, Utah is making it easier for AI-using organizations to understand and comply with the state’s regulations.


1 Brian Eastwood, What is synthetic data — and how can it help you competitively?, MIT Sloan (Jan 23, 2023), https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/what-synthetic-data-and-how-can-it-help-you-competitively.

2 Kim Martineau, What is synthetic data?, IBM Research (Feb. 8, 2023), https://research.ibm.com/blog/what-is-synthetic-data.

3 Utah Code § 13-61-101(24).

4 S.B. 149 § 13-61-101(14)(b), (34).

5 Id § 13-2-12(2).

6 Id § 13-2-12(3).

7 Id § 13-2-12(4).

8 Id ch. 70.

9 S.B. 131 § 20A-11-1104.

10 Id. § 76-3-203.18. This amendment takes effect on July 1, 2024.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

February 21, 2025

The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) final rule implements President Biden’s Executive Order 14117 of February 28, 2024, on “Preventing Access to Americans’ Bulk Sensitive Personal Data and United States Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern” (EO) and is intended to address a perceived gap in existing national security authorities to adequately address threats posed by the continuing effort of certain countries of concern to access Americans’ sensitive personal data and U.S. government-related data. (For additional information, please see our prior alerts on the proposed rule and issuance of the EO and DOJ’s accompanying advance notice of proposed rulemaking). This new and very complex regulatory regime reflects the U.S. government’s growing national security concerns about China and other adversarial governments obtaining access to Americans’ sensitive personal data through sales and licensing agreements, as well as certain vendor, employment and investment transactions, and that such agreements and transactions could enable these countries to use biometric, financial, ‘omic, geolocation or health data or other personal identifiers to engage in malicious cyber-enabled activities, espionage, tracking of military and national security personnel, blackmail or other nefarious activities.

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 22, 2025

On January 17, 2025, days before the inauguration, former President Joe Biden issued an executive order titled Strengthening and Promoting Innovation in the Nation's Cybersecurity (EO 14144). Building on previous efforts, including Executive Order 14028, this directive seeks to bolster cybersecurity across federal systems, supply chains and critical infrastructure from adversarial nations, particularly from the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 10, 2025

UPDATE: The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has extended the deadline for submitting public comments from January 14 to February 19, 2025, in response to the recent California wildfires. This extension aims to afford stakeholders additional time to provide comprehensive and detailed feedback, considering the significant challenges posed by the wildfires.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 25, 2024

Treasury has issued a Final Rule to implement President Biden’s 2023 EO targeting U.S. investments in Chinese companies engaged in certain activities related to semiconductors, quantum computing or AI.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.