Cleared for Takeoff: OFAC’s General License J Allows Boeing, Airbus and Other Aircraft to Land in Iran

Aug 2, 2016

Reading Time : 5 min

By: Thomas J. McCarthy, Wynn H. Segall, Mahmoud (Mac) Fadlallah, Matthew D. Hawkins, Senior International Policy Specialist

GL-J represents the latest in a series of steps, following the implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action on January 16, 2016, to ease sanctions on Iran in exchange for Iran’s halting of its nuclear program. However, GL-J is the first such step to affect the longstanding U.S. embargo on the export or reexport to Iran of items subject to U.S. export controls.

Who is Eligible to Use the Authorization in GL-J?

The authorization in GL-J applies only to non-U.S. persons. This means that U.S. persons—including U.S. citizens and permanent residents, as well as any entities organized under U.S. law (including branches of such entities outside the United States)—are not eligible to use GL-J and require specific licensing from OFAC in order to reexport aircraft to Iran.

Non-U.S. persons should take care to ensure that no U.S. persons are involved in their Iran-related activities. This includes, for example, U.S. person pilots working for non-U.S. person airlines, U.S. person technical engineers working for aerospace maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) companies, and U.S. person parent companies of non-U.S. subsidiaries.

What Aircraft Are Eligible for the Authorization in GL-J?

In order for an aircraft subject to be eligible for the reexport authorization in GL-J (an “Eligible Aircraft”), the aircraft must be (i) a fixed-wing civil aircraft (classified under U.S. export control classification number (ECCN) 9A991.b) and (ii) registered in a jurisdiction other than Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria and the United States. Such aircraft include U.S.-origin civil fixed-wing aircraft (e.g., civil Boeing aircraft or Airbus aircraft manufactured in the United States) as well as non-U.S. origin civil fixed-wing aircraft with U.S.-controlled content exceeding 10 percent or more of the total value of the aircraft (e.g., civil Airbus aircraft manufactured outside the United States and fitted with U.S. engines). Such aircraft are subject to U.S. export controls and require an OFAC license to be exported or reexported to Iran, whether by a U.S. or non-U.S. entity.

The following aircraft are not Eligible Aircraft and are not authorized for export to Iran under GL-J: helicopters or other rotary wing aircraft, unmanned or optionally piloted aircraft, or military aircraft, including demilitarized military aircraft.

What Does “Temporary Sojourn” Mean?

GL-J authorizes non-U.S. persons to reexport Eligible Aircraft to Iran on “temporary sojourn.” To qualify as a “temporary sojourn” under GL-J, the reexport transaction (i.e., the flight/voyage) must satisfy certain conditions, as follows:

Conditions on the Non-U.S. Person Operator. The non-U.S. person reexporter/operator of the Eligible Aircraft must retain the right to (i) hire and fire the cockpit crew; (ii) dispatch the Eligible Aircraft; (iii) determine the Eligible Aircraft’s routes; and (iv) perform or obtain the principal maintenance of the Eligible Aircraft. In addition, the non-U.S. person operator must ensure that there is no transfer of technology to an Iranian national ordinarily resident in Iran, except as provided below.

Conditions on the Eligible Aircraft. The Eligible Aircraft must (i) undergo principal maintenance outside of Iran, under the control of a party who is not an Iranian national ordinarily resident in Iran; (ii) remain registered outside Iran during the temporary sojourn (i.e., registration will not change while the Eligible Aircraft is in Iran); (iii) not bear the color, livery or logo of any Iranian air carrier; (iv) not carry a flight number issued to any Iranian air carrier; (v) not be equipped with, or used to transport, items that are military in nature; and (vi) be in Iran for no more than 72 hours on each voyage.

While these conditions generally authorize third-country operators to serve routes to and from Iran from the operator’s home base outside of Iran, they preclude entering into certain other transactions such as codeshare or leasing (e.g., wet, damp, dry) arrangements.

Authorization for Associated Repair and Maintenance Transactions

In addition to authorizing non-U.S. persons to reexport Eligible Aircraft to Iran on temporary sojourn, GL-J authorizes certain associated repair and maintenance transactions. These additional authorizations apply to spare parts, components and related technology that are subject to U.S. controls (e.g., due to U.S. origin or content).

To be eligible for reexport authorization under GL-J, the parts, components and technology must be classified under one of the following ECCNs: 9A991.c, 9A991.d, 9A991.e or 9E991. These ECCNs include the vast majority of commercial aircraft parts, components and technology, including most engines, but exclude, for example, hot section technology, most standard navigational and avionics equipment, and some standard aircraft communications-related equipment.

For eligible items, GL-J authorizes non-U.S. persons to:

  • reexport “usual and reasonable” quantities of these parts and components to Iran, onboard the Eligible Aircraft, provided that the items are “ordinarily incident and necessary for the proper operation of the Eligible Aircraft”
  • reexport technology for purposes of emergency maintenance on and/or repairs to an Eligible Aircraft, provided that the technology is “necessary to restore the aircraft to an airworthy condition.”

While these repair and maintenance authorizations may prove helpful in avoiding aircraft-on-ground (AOG) situations, they do not authorize the storing of any items in Iran, whether at a non-U.S. person’s own line station or otherwise, nor do they authorize transactions related to non-emergency maintenance on Eligible Aircraft in Iran.

Key Limitations

In addition to the conditions described above, certain other key limitations apply to the use of GL-J, as follows:

  • Cargo carriers must note that while GL-J may authorize their Eligible Aircraft to fly into Iran, it does not authorize the cargo that they carry to enter Iranian commerce. Such transactions require separate authorization if the cargo is subject to U.S. controls (and may require authorization from other competent government authorities). Failure to obtain such authorization creates liability not only for the shipper and consignee, but also for the freight forwarder, cargo carrier and any other party to the transaction—each of which may be held liable for an unauthorized transaction.
  • GL-J does not authorize dealings with restricted parties, such as those listed on OFAC’s list of Specially Designated Nationals, or any transaction involving restricted end-uses or end-users under U.S. export control laws (e.g., transactions involving weapons of mass destruction proliferation, foreign terrorist organizations or certain transactions involving parties listed on the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Entity List or Unverified List). GL-J also does not authorize transactions with any party whose export privileges have been denied under U.S. export control laws.
  • GL-J does not authorize non-U.S. persons to engage in any transactions with respect to aircraft—even Eligible Aircraft—or aircraft spare parts or components, if the non-U.S. person has knowledge or reason to know that an export violation has occurred with respect to those items.

In sum, GL-J authorizes straightforward transactions involving third-country commercial airlines wishing to serve Iran routes with Eligible Aircraft from the airline’s home base outside of Iran. However, even seemingly minor complications to these otherwise straightforward transactions may run afoul of GL-J’s conditions and preclude the airline’s ability to rely on GL-J. Please do not hesitate to reach out to us if you have any questions regarding this development.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.