Diversity and Inclusion on Company Boards and Executive Management Policy

May 17, 2022

Reading Time : 4 min

By: Ezra Zahabi, Amy Kennedy, George O'Malley, Charles Edward Smith, Oliver Haynes, Trainee Solicitor (not admitted to practice)

Which issuers are subject to the new requirements?

U.K. and overseas issuers with equity shares (or certificates representing equity shares) admitted to the premium or standard segment of the FCA’s Official List must either meet a new set of diversity targets (described below) and disclose their existing board diversity metrics or, alternatively, issue disclosures explaining why the issuer is not complying with the new requirements. The requirements apply to closed-ended investment funds and sovereign-controlled companies, but do not apply to open-ended investment companies, shell companies or issuers of listed debt and debt-like securities, securitized derivatives or miscellaneous securities.

When do the new requirements take effect?

The new requirements apply to in-scope issuers for financial years starting on or after April 1, 2022.

New diversity targets

Issuers that are within the scope of the new rules must, on a ‘comply or explain’ basis, seek to meet the new diversity targets. Issuers must include a statement in their annual financial report stating whether they have satisfied the following targets (the “Targets”):

  • The board consists of at least 40 percent women.
  • At least one of the senior board positions (Chair, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Senior Independent Director (SID) or Chief Financial Officer (CFO)) is held by a woman.
  • At least one member of the board is from a minority ethnic background.1

If the issuer is unable to comply with the Targets, then it must explain the reasons for noncompliance in its annual report. The FCA’s guidance clarifies that issuers within the scope of the disclosure requirements should also include the following contextual information:

  • A brief summary of any key policies, procedures and processes, and any wider context that the issuer considers to contribute to improving the diversity of its board and executive management.
  • Any mitigating factors or circumstances which make achieving diversity on its board more challenging (for example, the size of the board or the country where its main operations are located).
  • Any risks it foresees in being able to meet or continue to meet the board diversity targets in the next accounting period, or any plans to improve the diversity of its board.

If the reporting reference date does not align with the accounting reference date, the reporting issuer should explain the reason for divergence. Any changes that have affected the issuer’s ability to meet one or more of the Targets between the reference date and the date on which the annual financial report is approved must also be noted.

Data Disclosure

Accompanying the forward-looking diversity Targets is a new set of disclosure requirements regarding the present diversity of the boards. Alongside the annual narrative comply or explain disclosures, the FCA requires issuers to publish quantitative data on the sex or gender identity and ethnic diversity of their boards, senior board positions (Chair, CEO, SID and CFO) and executive management in the standardized table formats set out below:


The parameters for the data collected for disclosure purposes are not prescribed but should be objectively justifiable and consistent. Where the collected data is self-reported by natural persons, a description of the questions asked to obtain such data should be provided. An explanation of the data-collection approach and data sources used must be presented together with the disclosures.2

The FCA permits adjustments and exemptions to the above disclosures, provided they are explained in the statement, with respect to issuers who have members of their board or executive management situated overseas, and who are subject to local laws preventing the collection or publication of the data required for the quantitative disclosure. Similarly, closed-ended investment funds and sovereign-controlled companies are exempt from the disclosure requirements where the disclosures are inapplicable.

Looking Ahead

The Targets and quantitative disclosures are but a “first step” in setting out a new regulatory framework on D&I. Further to the FCA’s joint paper with the PRA and Bank of England, a consultation paper is expected to be published later this year, setting out the broad proposals that will build upon and reinforce that existing D&I-related legislation.

Such efforts should be located within a wider, international push for D&I on company boards. In the U.S., new NASDAQ listing rules on board diversity disclosures and targets, which we wrote about here, are coming into effect from August 8, 2022—requiring in-scope companies to similarly disclose board-level diversity statistics3 on an annual basis and have a minimum of two diverse board members.4 As with the incoming FCA rules, the NASDAQ disclosures are to be provided according to standardized formats on a comply or explain basis, with the hope that they enable investors to better understand company approaches to D&I.5

We encourage issuers to stay abreast of future developments in this area and invite our friends and clients to get in touch with Akin Gump to further discuss next steps.


1 Defined by reference to categories recommended by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and excluding those listed, by the ONS, as coming from a white ethnic background.

2 LR 9.8.6I G and LR 14.3.36G

3 Nasdaq Rule 5606

4 Nasdaq Rule 5605(f)

5 We note here that Nasdaq’s Diversity Rule is currently subject to a legal challenge currently pending before the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. The case is styled Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. SEC, No. 21-60626

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.