ISS Attempts to Legislate Common Sense: A Targeted Policy Aims to Introduce Gender Diversity to the Last All-Male Public Company Boards

Oct 22, 2018

Reading Time : 3 min

The Common Sense Policy effectively would legislate a new approach to an existing and ongoing problem that denies single-sex boards the ability to take into account input that a reasonably prudent person would arguably want or need to make an informed decision. By not enlisting the views of any member of the United States population that both grew up as female and makes up 51% of our citizenry, all-male boards arguably risk breaching their fiduciary duty of care on a regular basis, particularly when one takes into account the current cultural, political and economic climate.

The ISS survey asked respondents to identify whether having no female directors serve on a public company board is problematic. Of the respondents, 45% of investors indicated their belief that it is problematic for no female directors to be serving on a public company board and 75% of investors believe that shareholders should consider supporting a shareholder proposal aimed at increasing diversity.

Investors, as well as regulators, clearly are increasingly aware of the disparity, particularly in light of recent studies linking higher levels of gender diversity to improved results in companies’ talent retention, innovation, reputation and financial performance. Indeed, United States regulators have taken a variety of approaches to correcting the gender gap in board representation. The SEC’s disclosure-based regime includes a rule requiring companies to publicly disclose whether they consider diversity in identifying and evaluating director nominees. California recently joined Norway, France, Belgium and Italy in imposing a quota on public companies and levying fines on companies that fail to comply.

Gender diversity inclusiveness has been achieved on many United States company boards, but the movement has not been uniform across industry or market cap.  Catalyst reported that women held only 20.2% of board seats of Fortune 500 companies as recently as 2016, in spite of representing 46.8% of the labor force and 51.5% of management, professional and related positions. In 2017, a space between 87% and of the companies in the S&P 1500 and 84% of the Russell 3000 Index had at least one woman on their board.

The Common Sense Policy is designed to further the efforts toward board inclusiveness by holding someone accountable: namely, the chairs of the nominating committees. This targeted approach, which ISS similarly has implemented in the case where a chairman is also the chief executive officer and there is no lead director, may prove to be a useful tool, although in a more perfect world, would be unnecessary.

Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist No. 1, states, among other things: “It is frequently remarked, that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not, of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend, for their political constitutions, on accident and force.”

Boards would better serve their constituents by reviewing economic and other data that supports gender diversity without the potentially heavy hand of ISS proxy advisory legislation via a Common Sense Policy. However, to date, all too many boards have continued to utilize convenience and continuity of existing membership as an excuse for ignoring what is both ideologically right and statistically best for shareholders.

ISS is currently seeking feedback on the design of its Common Sense Policy. We encourage our clients and readers to consider responding and sharing their own views about the best way to improve diversity among corporate leadership.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.