Obama Administration Further Eases Restrictions to Aid Implementation of Cuba Policy

Sep 23, 2015

Reading Time : 7 min

This coordinated action by OFAC and BIS builds upon, and consolidates, previous changes easing U.S. sanctions on Cuba under the CACR and EAR implemented in January 2015, which relaxed restrictions on travel and commerce, increased allowable remittances, and provided allowances to expand access to Internet and telecommunications services in Cuba. The latest amendments signal the continued commitment of the administration to its reversal of long-standing U.S. policy in favor of a policy of engagement with Cuba and to create opportunities for U.S. companies in a range of business sectors to return to Cuba in ways that have been blocked by U.S. sanctions for more than half a century. Importantly, other features of the long-standing U.S. embargo on Cuba continue to restrict other kinds of trade, transactions and travel between the United States and Cuba absent general or specific authorization by OFAC.

Summary of Amended Regulations

Financial and Trade Transactions

OFAC has implemented measures permitting certain financial and trade transactions involving Cuban nationals. Specifically, the amendments:

  • authorize all persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction to provide goods and services to individual Cuban nationals located outside of Cuba
  • remove the $2,000 per quarter cap on donative remittance to Cuban nationals who are not officials of the Government of Cuba or prohibited members of the Cuban Communist Party
  • remove the limitations on remittances that individuals may take to Cuba, which were previously set at $10,000 for U.S. persons and $3,000 for Cuban nationals, and authorize banking institutions to release funds that were previously blocked because they exceeded these limits
  • permit depository institutions to maintain accounts for certain Cuban nationals located outside the United States provided that the accountholder may access such accounts only while lawfully present in the United States.

Physical Presence and Operations in Cuba

OFAC has amended the CACR to allow U.S. persons engaged in specified authorized activities, including U.S. telecommunications and Internet services providers, to establish and maintain a physical presence in Cuba through an office or other facility, such as a retail outlet or warehouse. The regulations also authorize these persons to open and maintain bank accounts at financial institutions in Cuba for use in authorized transactions, as well as to employ Cuban nationals and persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction in Cuba. This authorization applies to persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction that fall in the categories below:

  • news bureaus
  • exporters of certain goods authorized for export or reexport (e.g., agricultural products, supplies used by private sector entrepreneurs, and construction materials)
  • providers of authorized mail and parcel transmission services
  • providers of cargo transportation services
  • providers of telecommunication or Internet-based services
  • entities organizing or conducting certain educational activities
  • religious organizations
  • providers of certain travel and carrier services.

Notably, this authorization also appears to provide a basis for authorization of U.S. persons qualified to sell goods to Cuba under an expansion of BIS License Exception SCP. The license exception now authorizes exports and reexports of commodities and software to individuals and privately-owned entities in Cuba for use in developing software to improve the free flow of information and/or support certain private-sector activities to improve living conditions and support independent economic activity. In addition, in coordination with OFAC, BIS has amended the EAR to permit the export and reexport to Cuba of items necessary to persons authorized to establish a physical presence in Cuba.

Authorized Travel to Cuba and Travel-Related Services

The amended regulations further expand existing allowances for authorized travel to, and commerce with, Cuba. Specifically, the new amendments:

  • authorize close relatives to visit or accompany authorized travelers to Cuba who are engaged in official government business, journalistic activity, professional research, educational activities, religious activities, humanitarian projects, and activities of private foundations or research or educational institutions
  • establish a general license for transportation by vessels, including cruise ships, between the United States. and Cuba (without stops in third countries) of persons authorized to travel to Cuba, including visitors engaging in permissible “People-to-People” travel to Cuba
  • authorize U.S. aircraft and vessels on temporary sojourn to Cuba under BIS License Exception Aircraft, Vessels, and Spacecraft
  • permit U.S. authorized travelers to open and maintain bank accounts in Cuba in order to access funds while in Cuba to engage in permissible activities and transactions.

Educational Activities

The amended regulations also expand the general license for educational activities in Cuba to permit the establishment of academic exchanges and non-commercial academic research projects with universities or academic institutions in Cuba. The amendments further authorize Internet-based courses and the provision of standardized testing services in relation to professional certificate examinations, university entrance examinations, and language examinations for Cuban nationals.

Telecommunications and Internet-based Services

The latest action by the administration includes amendments to OFAC and BIS regulations pertaining to telecommunications and Internet-based services providers, including the following provisions:

  • Telecommunications and Internet-service providers are authorized to establish a business presence in Cuba through the establishment of subsidiaries, branches, offices, franchises, and agency or other business relationships with any Cuban individual or entity, including ETECSA, Cuba’s state-owned telecommunications service provider.
  • The CACR also now authorize U.S. companies to enter into licensing agreements and engage in marketing activities in Cuba for provision of telecommunications and Internet services.
  • Imports into the United States of Cuban-origin mobile applications are now authorized, and U.S. persons may employ Cuban nationals to develop such mobile applications.
  • BIS has expanded the License Exception SCP to authorize exports and reexports of commodities and software to individuals and privately-owned entities in Cuba, as discussed above.
  • BIS has also expanded the license exception for Consumer Communication Devices to permit the export and reexport to Cuba of leased or loaned items, such as computers, mobile phones and televisions.

Significance of the Administration’s Latest Actions

The new regulatory amendments build upon, and help to consolidate, previous sanctions relief measures for Cuba by further easing sanctions related to travel, telecommunications and Internet-based services, business operations in Cuba and remittances. While the latest revisions do not provide sanctions relief for new business sectors other than those that have been the focus of policy changes initiated earlier this year, the new measures help make it more practical and achievable for U.S. companies that qualify for these allowances to pursue trade and investment opportunities on-the-ground in Cuba. This includes measures permitting such companies to establish on the ground operations and to engage more effectively with Cuban business counterparts. More fundamentally, these changes provide the latest tangible demonstration that the Obama administration is invested in the policy of engagement with Cuba announced at the end of last year, actively evaluating areas of possible opportunity for further sanctions relief and seeking to consolidate its new approach to Cuba as a hallmark of the President’s legacy during his remaining months in office.

As discussed above, this latest Cuba sanctions relief focuses primarily on strategic economic sectors (e.g., travel, cargo, carrier, telecommunications and education), previously subject to sanctions relief in January, to address practical impediments to companies interested in pursuing potential new opportunities for trade and investment in those sectors. For example, for telecommunications providers, the new sanctions relief expressly permits the establishment of “subsidiaries, branches, offices, joint ventures, franchises, and agency or other business relationships with any Cuban national” and authorizes them to “enter into all necessary agreements or arrangements” with Cuban nationals to provide telecommunications or Internet-based services. These regulations add another dimension to the administration’s efforts to enhance the free flow of information to, from and among the Cuban people and to provide more efficient telecommunications services between the United States and Cuba.

These new measures notwithstanding, the comprehensive U.S. embargo against Cuba remains codified in statutory law that can be reversed only by an act of Congress. While there appears to be growing consensus on Capitol Hill to consider legislation to address the established legal framework of U.S. sanctions on Cuba, it remains unclear when such action will be politically feasible and legislatively achieved. Accordingly, U.S. persons and foreign companies owned or controlled by U.S. persons remain subject to core provisions of the U.S. sanctions regime that generally bar investment in, or trade with, Cuba except as authorized by OFAC, consistent with policy determinations and actions taken by the President and his administration.

Separately, it remains to be seen how and when Cuba will permit U.S. companies to enter the Cuban market to engage in the growing areas of commercial activity authorized by changes in U.S. law. While the administration has taken substantial steps to pursue engagement with Cuba this year, normalization of economic relations with Cuba also will necessitate a bilateral process for resolution of long-standing U.S. property claims against Cuba dating back to 1960. However, while these challenges remain, it is clear that U.S. and Cuban officials are committed to see to conclusion ongoing diplomatic negotiations to address these and other challenges and concerns. The latest actions by the administration to further relax U.S. sanctions measures confirm that the bilateral commitment to advance the process of engagement remains on track and progressing, with the promise of new opportunities in an opening Cuban market on the horizon.

We will continue to monitor developments as they unfold and encourage clients to contact us to learn more about how these new rules impact specific business operations.

Contact Information

If you have any questions concerning this alert, please contact: 

Wynn H. Segall
wsegall@akingump.com
202.887.4573
Washington, D.C.

Nnedinma C. Ifudu Nweke
nifudu@akingump.com
202.887.4013
Washington, D.C.

Scott David Parven
sparven@akingump.com
202.887.4119
Washington, D.C.

Jennifer L. Richter
jrichter@akingump.com
202.887.4524
Washington, D.C.

Anya Landau French
alandaufrench@akingump.com
202.887.4226
Washington, D.C.

Dallas Woodrum
dwoodrum@akingump.com
202.887.4591
Washington, D.C.

Lyndsey M. Grunewald
lgrunewald@akingump.com
202.887.4413
Washington, D.C.
 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.