SEC Provides Guidance on “General Solicitation” in C&DIs and No-Action Letter

Aug 31, 2015

Reading Time : 4 min

Background

In general, all sales of securities must be registered pursuant to Section 5 of the Securities Act, unless the sale falls within a statutory exemption or safe harbor. Rule 506(b) of Regulation D is one such safe harbor, but it prohibits general solicitations and general advertisements.

General Solicitation or General Advertisement

As affirmed by the SEC in its C&DIs, an offer of securities to a potential investor with whom the issuer or its agent has a “pre-existing, substantive relationship” does not constitute a general solicitation or general advertisement. The SEC provided the following guidance on the establishment of a pre-existing, substantive relationship:

  • Pre-Existing Relationship. A “pre-existing” relationship is one that an issuer forms with a potential investor prior to commencing a securities offering. A pre-existing relationship can also be established by an issuer with a potential investor through a registered broker-dealer or investment advisor if the issuer established this relationship prior to the registered broker-dealer or investment advisor’s participation in the offering.
  • Substantive Relationship. A “substantive” relationship exists when an issuer has sufficient information to evaluate a prospective investor’s financial circumstances and sophistication when determining such prospective investor’s status as an accredited or sophisticated investor. Importantly, the issuer must actually undergo the evaluation. It is insufficient for an issuer merely to collect such information without reviewing it. Furthermore, self-certification by the prospective offeree is insufficient alone to form a substantive relationship between the issuer and the prospective offeree. Finally, the Staff considers the “quality” of an issuer’s relationship with a potential investor to be the “most important factor” in determining whether a substantive relationship exists.

The Citizen VC No-Action Letter

Citizen VC uses an online venture capital investment platform to facilitate indirect investment by its members. As noted in C&DI Question 256.23, Rule 502(c) prohibits offerings through an unrestricted, publicly available website. The Citizen VC request letter sets forth the policies and procedures that Citizen VC employs to establish a pre-existing, substantive relationship, which provides a useful blueprint, even outside the context of websites, for other issuers wishing to rely on the Rule 506(b) safe harbor.

Importantly, after prospective investors complete generic online “accredited investor” questionnaires, Citizen VC then proceeds to a “relationship establishment period.” During this period, Citizen VC takes various actions to connect with the prospective investors and collect information to evaluate the prospective investor’s sophistication, financial circumstances, and ability to understand the nature and risks related to an investment.

Finally, after Citizen VC is satisfied that the prospective investor is sophisticated, and after taking all reasonable steps it believes necessary to create a substantive relationship, Citizen VC will then give the prospective investor access to password-protected sections of the website to investigate investment opportunities. Consistent with guidance from the Staff, this relationship exists prior to the commencement of any offering.

Additional Guidance from the Staff

  • No Minimum Waiting Period. To establish a pre-existing, substantive relationship, there is no minimum waiting period. Rather, the issuer must establish a relationship prior to the commencement of the offering; or, when the relationship is established through a registered broker-dealer or investment advisor, the relationship must be established prior to the time such registered broker-dealer or investment advisor began participating in the offering. Note that a limited accommodation exists for certain private funds making offerings on a semicontinuous basis, in which a waiting period may cleanse what would otherwise be considered a general solicitation.
  • Registered Investment Advisors. A registered investment advisor’s fiduciary duty to provide suitable investment advice to its clients would likely establish a pre-existing, substantive relationship, because, in fulfilling this duty, an advisor must make a reasonable determination that the investment advice provided is suitable for the client based upon the client’s financial situation and investment objective.
  • Registered Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisors. Depending on the facts and circumstances, third parties other than registered broker-dealers and investment advisors may be able to form a pre-existing, substantive relationship with a prospective investor. However, in the absence of a prior business relationship or a recognized legal duty to offerees, it is likely more difficult for an issuer to establish a pre-existing, substantive relationship, especially when contemplating or engaging in an offering over the Internet. In such circumstances, the Staff notes that Rule 506(c) would provide greater certainty regarding the availability of an exemption from registration.
  • Demo Days and Venture Fairs. Whether a demo day or venture fair constitutes a general solicitation for purposes of Rule 502(c) is a facts-and-circumstances determination. For instance, if the presentation by the issuer involves an offer of a security, such presentation may not constitute a general solicitation if, for example, attendance is limited to persons with whom the issuer or the organizer has a pre-existing, substantive relationship or who have been contacted through an informal, personal network of individuals with experience investing in private offerings.
  • Factual Business Information. An issuer can widely disseminate information not involving an offer of securities without violating Rule 502(c), including factual business information that does not condition the public mind or arouse public interest in an offering. Factual business information is typically limited to information about the issuer, its business, financial condition, products, services, or advertisement of such products or services, and generally does not include predictions, projections, forecasts or opinions with respect to valuation of a security. Also, for a continuously offered fund, it would not include information about past performance of the fund. 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.