What Implementation of the Iran Nuclear Deal Means for U.S. Companies and Their Subsidiaries Abroad

Jan 19, 2016

Reading Time : 6 min

This alert examines the implications of this sanctions relief for U.S. companies and their U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities. While the Agreement removes the application of various sanctions to non-U.S. companies, the U.S. sanctions regime largely remains intact in its application to U.S. companies and individuals and, to some extent, continues to expand. Still, the JCPOA sanctions relief provides (i) a general license authorizing certain activities of foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies, (ii) a favorable licensing policy for the export and re-export to Iran of certain commercial passenger aircraft and related parts and services, and (iii) a general license authorizing the import of Iranian carpets and certain foodstuff (e.g., pistachios and caviar). These restrictions, opportunities and risks that apply to U.S. companies and their subsidiaries abroad are discussed in more detail below.

Primary U.S. Sanctions Still Apply

U.S. sanctions against Iran are based on a variety of policy considerations beyond nuclear proliferation (e.g., terrorism, human rights, ballistic missiles, etc.). Since the Agreement did not resolve any of these other policy concerns, the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (ITSR) (31 C.F.R. Part 560), administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), continue to restrict U.S. persons broadly from engaging in transactions involving Iran. OFAC’s List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (“SDN List”) also still identifies various Iranian entities that are subject to blocking orders (i.e., subject to asset freezes) and with whom U.S. persons and foreign entities owned or controlled by them are prohibited from conducting business. These restrictions effectively amount to a continued U.S. embargo against Iran, and still exclude Iran from the U.S. financial system.

Moreover, U.S. sanctions are expanding outside of the Agreement. Notably, on January 17, 2016, one day after Implementation Day, OFAC sanctioned 11 entities for their alleged role in Tehran’s ballistic missile program, which include U.A.E.-based Mabrooka Trading Co. LLC, its founder and five Iranian Ministry of Defense for Armed Forces Logistics officials.

General License H for Foreign Entities Owned or Controlled by a U.S. Person

While the ITSR restrictions continue to apply to foreign entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons, OFAC has issued General License H that, effective immediately, authorizes such entities to enter into certain transactions involving Iran. It also authorizes U.S. persons (e.g., U.S. parent companies and employees) to engage in limited activities in support of their foreign subsidiaries.

General License H broadly authorizes U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities to enter into Iran-related transactions unless they fall under any of the eight enumerated prohibitions. Specifically, these foreign entities are not permitted to engage in Iran-related transactions that involve:

  1. the direct or indirect export or reexport of goods, technology or services from the United States, including items containing 10 percent or more U.S.-controlled content, without separate authorization from OFAC
  2. any transfer of funds to, from or through the U.S. financial system
  3. any individual or entity on the SDN List or any activity that would be prohibited by non-Iran sanctions administered by OFAC if engaged in by a U.S. person or in the United States
  4. any individual or entity identified on the Foreign Sanctions Evaders (FSE) List
  5. unless authorized by the U.S. Department of Commerce, activity prohibited by, or requiring a license under, part 744 of the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR) or involving a person whose export privileges have been denied pursuant to part 764 or 766 of the EAR
  6. any military, paramilitary, intelligence or law enforcement entity of the Government of Iran, or any officials, agents or affiliates thereof
  7. any activity that is sanctionable under certain executive orders relating to Iran’s proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery (including ballistic missiles); international terrorism; Syria; Yemen; or Iran’s commission of human rights abuses against its citizens
  8. any nuclear activity involving Iran that is subject to the procurement channel established pursuant to UNSCR 2231 and the JCPOA and that has not been approved through the procurement channel process.

In addition, General License H authorizes U.S. persons, including senior management, to be involved in the initial determination as to whether to engage in activities with Iran under the general license. U.S. persons may also establish, alter and provide training on corporate policies and procedures to allow U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities to engage in activities authorized under General License H. Lastly, U.S. persons can make certain “automated” and “globally integrated” business support systems available to U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities to support engagement in permissible Iran-related transactions.

However, the general license does not authorize U.S. persons to continue to be involved in the ongoing Iran-related operations or decision making of its U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities once the establishment or alteration of corporate policies and procedures is complete. In other words, OFAC’s ITSR restrictions on U.S. persons’ involvement in the Iran-related day-to-day operations of a U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entity will continue to apply. This includes prohibitions on U.S. persons approving, financing, facilitating or guaranteeing any Iran-related transaction by its U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities. For instance, these restrictions would apply to U.S. person employees of U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities engaging in authorized activities under General License H.

Licensing Policy for the Export or Reexport to Iran of Commercial Passenger Aircraft and Related Parts and Services

OFAC also issued a statement of licensing policy through which U.S. persons (and non-U.S. persons) may expect favorable treatment of license applications involving Iran-related transactions for the (i) export, reexport, sale, lease or transfer to Iran of commercial passenger aircraft exclusively for civil aviation end use, (ii) export, reexport, sale, lease or transfer to Iran of spare parts and components for commercial passenger aircraft; and (iii) provision of associated services, including warranty, maintenance and repair services and safety-related inspections for all the foregoing, provided that licensed items and services are used exclusively for commercial passenger aviation. The favorable licensing policy covers wide-body, narrow-body, regional and commuter aircraft used for commercial passenger aviation. However, it excludes cargo aircraft, state aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, military aircraft and aircraft used for general aviation or aerial work.

OFAC has also stated that licenses approved pursuant to this licensing policy “will include appropriate conditions to ensure that licensed activities do not involve, and no licensed aircraft, goods, or services are re-sold or retransferred to, any person on the SDN list.” Furthermore, any license applications that request authorization to export, reexport or transfer U.S. export-controlled items must be consistent with all U.S. legal requirements, including the EAR and other related Department of Commerce regulations.

General License and Regulatory Amendment Authorizing the Imports of Iranian-Origin Carpets and Foodstuffs

OFAC also issued a general license authorizing the importation into the United States of Iranian-origin carpets, other textile floor and wall coverings, and foodstuffs that are intended for human consumption. OFAC specifically clarified that the definition of foodstuffs includes Iranian-origin pistachios and caviar. Furthermore, U.S. persons are authorized to act as brokers for the purchase or sale of Iranian-origin carpets and foodstuffs that are authorized to be imported into the United States. While restrictions continue to exist with respect to debits and credits to Iranian accounts, payments are authorized for these imports, such as U.S. depository institutions being authorized to process letters of credit for such payments. Importantly, the ITSR amendment authorizing the importation of Iranian-origin carpets and foodstuffs will only go into effect after its publication in the Federal Register.

Conclusion

U.S. persons and foreign entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons are still subject to U.S. sanctions with respect to activities involving Iran. However, as of January 16, 2016, there are additional opportunities for U.S. companies with respect to Iran, particularly through foreign subsidiaries and in the commercial aviation sector. If U.S. companies are interested in entering the Iranian market through these permissible channels, the remaining legal and practical challenges require a cautious approach. For instance, beyond the regulatory restrictions identified above, significant risks may still exist in the financial system with respect to transactions involving Iran. Consequently, considerable legal and business review and planning is necessary to guard against the continued risk in the Iranian market.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.