CFIUS Annual Report Confirms Strong Chinese Investment and Renewed Concern about Foreign Governments’ Efforts to Acquire US

Mar 6, 2015

Reading Time : 2 min

CFIUS cleared a total of 46 transactions in 2013, during the initial 30-day review phase. It went to the 45-day investigation phase in 48 of the 97 notices reviewed in 2013. Although this number is slightly higher than CFIUS’ 40 investigations in 2011 and 45 investigations in 2012, the report suggested that the increase did not represent a broader trend. Five cases automatically proceeded into the investigation phase because CFIUS had been unable to review them during the federal government shutdown in October 2013.

CFIUS required mitigation measures as conditions to clearing 11 covered transactions. Mitigation measures are legally binding terms that require parties to modify their agreements or implement measures to address specific national security concerns. CFIUS reported that mitigation measures had been applied to investments in the telecommunications, software, mining, oil and gas, manufacturing, consulting and technology industries. Examples of these measures included limitations on access to certain technology and information, guidelines for U.S. government contracts and government notification requirements regarding security incidents or visits by foreign nationals. To ensure compliance with the measures, CFIUS will require periodic reporting, third-party audits and on-site compliance reviews by U.S. agencies, as well as investigations and remedial action in response to violations of mitigation measures or even suspicion of anomalous behavior.

CFIUS also approved the withdrawal of three notices during the initial 30-day review period and another five in the 45-day investigation period. Parties may request a withdrawal to have more time to respond to CFIUS’ questions and address potential national security concerns.

For the second year in a row, China accounted for the most CFIUS notices filed (21) by a foreign country in a single calendar year. Chinese investors filed 22 percent of the notices reviewed in 2013, compared to 20 percent of the notices reviewed in 2012. The stronger showing may signal growing Chinese confidence and sophistication regarding the CFIUS review process. In 2013, CFIUS approved the largest Chinese acquisition yet, Hong Kong-based Shuanghui Group’s $4.72 billion acquisition of the world’s largest pork producer, Smithfield Foods, Inc.

Japan accounted for the second highest number of notices reviewed (18) in 2013, a significant increase from the country’s nine notices in 2012 and seven notices in 2011. Canada’s 12 notices made it the third most represented country in 2013. Although the United Kingdom filed 68 notices from 2010-2012, it accounted for just seven notices in 2013.

Finally, CFIUS updated the U.S. intelligence community’s 2012 assessment of national security threats to U.S. critical technology. In the 2012 report, CFIUS backed off a previous assessment that there was a coordinated strategy among foreign governments to acquire U.S. critical technology. In the 2013 report, CFIUS reported the U.S. intelligence community’s revised position, advising that “foreign governments are extremely likely to continue to use a range of collection methods to obtain critical U.S. technologies,” including espionage. Nevertheless, CFIUS approved 85 mergers with, or acquisitions of, U.S. critical technology companies in 2013.

The 2013 report confirms that CFIUS will continue to keep close watch on critical technology and other potentially sensitive investments while it continues to approve, albeit with mitigation measures, an increasing number of foreign investments and acquisitions.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

July 19, 2024

Views expressed by Alan Yanovich.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

February 9, 2023

With the enactment of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the announcement of the European Union (EU) Green Deal Industrial Plan, there is now a full-fledged subsidy war between the United States and the European Union. While these subsidies are meant to encourage green technologies, incentivizing firms to produce locally would seem to be an almost as important policy goal. And it is not limited to the U.S. and the EU. Global Trade Alert recently reported that, in 2022, production subsidies accounted for half of all trade-distorting measures, making it the mostly commonly used harmful trade policy measure.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-01-24

Washington, D.C. partner Kevin Wolf, London partner Jasper Helder and Emily Kilcrease with the Center for New American Security submitted a detailed comment to U.S. and EU export control authorities to help guide and inform efforts to rationalize U.S. and EU export controls.  It can also be a useful resource for anyone interested in the topic and wanting to understand the history and context to current export control policy issues. They note that the US-EU Joint Statement on the role and purpose of export controls “is far more significant than generally recognized because it is the first time the EU (represented by the EC) or any other US ally has stated so explicitly and publicly since the end of the Cold War an agreement with the US that export controls should be used to achieve country-specific and other policy objectives not directly related to weapons of mass destruction or conventional military items.”

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.