China Continues to Dominate CFIUS Review

Feb 23, 2016

Reading Time : 1 min

Breakdown of “Covered Transactions”

  • Manufacturing and Finance, Information and Services Remain the Most Reviewed Sectors. In 2014, 47 percent of covered transactions filed with CFIUS related to the manufacturing sector, and 26 percent related to the finance, information and services sector. The mining, utilities and construction sectors and the wholesale, retail and transportation sectors accounted for the other 27 percent of covered transactions filed with CFIUS.
  • China Buyers Reviewed the Most, Again. For the third year in a row, China accounted for the most CFIUS notices filed (24) by a foreign country. The United Kingdom accounted for the second highest number of notices reviewed (21) in 2014, up significantly from seven in 2013. Canada’s 15 notices made it the third most represented country in 2014.

Other Important Takeaways

  • CFIUS Updated Its Assessment of National Security Threats to U.S. Critical Technology. According to the CFIUS report, the U.S. Intelligence Community suspects that foreign governments or companies “may be” using a coordinated strategy to acquire U.S. companies that research, develop or produce critical technologies. The report indicates that “foreign governments are extremely likely to continue to use a range of collection methods to obtain critical U.S. technologies.” These conclusions mirror those reached in last year’s report. According to CFIUS, information technology companies, electronics companies, materials companies and semiconductor companies are the prime targets of such efforts.
  • CFIUS Updated the Assessment of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States by Countries that Do Not Ban Terrorist Organizations. Based on its study of foreign direct investment into the United States, CFIUS found no M&A transactions by investors from Cuba, Iran, Syria or Venezuela, which were countries identified in 2014 as not fully cooperating with U.S. antiterrorism efforts. This lack of investment activity is consistent with U.S. economic sanctions related to these countries.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

July 19, 2024

Views expressed by Alan Yanovich.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

February 9, 2023

With the enactment of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the announcement of the European Union (EU) Green Deal Industrial Plan, there is now a full-fledged subsidy war between the United States and the European Union. While these subsidies are meant to encourage green technologies, incentivizing firms to produce locally would seem to be an almost as important policy goal. And it is not limited to the U.S. and the EU. Global Trade Alert recently reported that, in 2022, production subsidies accounted for half of all trade-distorting measures, making it the mostly commonly used harmful trade policy measure.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-01-24

Washington, D.C. partner Kevin Wolf, London partner Jasper Helder and Emily Kilcrease with the Center for New American Security submitted a detailed comment to U.S. and EU export control authorities to help guide and inform efforts to rationalize U.S. and EU export controls.  It can also be a useful resource for anyone interested in the topic and wanting to understand the history and context to current export control policy issues. They note that the US-EU Joint Statement on the role and purpose of export controls “is far more significant than generally recognized because it is the first time the EU (represented by the EC) or any other US ally has stated so explicitly and publicly since the end of the Cold War an agreement with the US that export controls should be used to achieve country-specific and other policy objectives not directly related to weapons of mass destruction or conventional military items.”

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.