Cleared for Takeoff: OFAC’s General License J Allows Boeing, Airbus and Other Aircraft to Land in Iran

Aug 2, 2016

Reading Time : 5 min

By: Thomas J. McCarthy, Wynn H. Segall, Mahmoud (Mac) Fadlallah, Matthew D. Hawkins, Senior International Policy Specialist

GL-J represents the latest in a series of steps, following the implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action on January 16, 2016, to ease sanctions on Iran in exchange for Iran’s halting of its nuclear program. However, GL-J is the first such step to affect the longstanding U.S. embargo on the export or reexport to Iran of items subject to U.S. export controls.

Who is Eligible to Use the Authorization in GL-J?

The authorization in GL-J applies only to non-U.S. persons. This means that U.S. persons—including U.S. citizens and permanent residents, as well as any entities organized under U.S. law (including branches of such entities outside the United States)—are not eligible to use GL-J and require specific licensing from OFAC in order to reexport aircraft to Iran.

Non-U.S. persons should take care to ensure that no U.S. persons are involved in their Iran-related activities. This includes, for example, U.S. person pilots working for non-U.S. person airlines, U.S. person technical engineers working for aerospace maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) companies, and U.S. person parent companies of non-U.S. subsidiaries.

What Aircraft Are Eligible for the Authorization in GL-J?

In order for an aircraft subject to be eligible for the reexport authorization in GL-J (an “Eligible Aircraft”), the aircraft must be (i) a fixed-wing civil aircraft (classified under U.S. export control classification number (ECCN) 9A991.b) and (ii) registered in a jurisdiction other than Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria and the United States. Such aircraft include U.S.-origin civil fixed-wing aircraft (e.g., civil Boeing aircraft or Airbus aircraft manufactured in the United States) as well as non-U.S. origin civil fixed-wing aircraft with U.S.-controlled content exceeding 10 percent or more of the total value of the aircraft (e.g., civil Airbus aircraft manufactured outside the United States and fitted with U.S. engines). Such aircraft are subject to U.S. export controls and require an OFAC license to be exported or reexported to Iran, whether by a U.S. or non-U.S. entity.

The following aircraft are not Eligible Aircraft and are not authorized for export to Iran under GL-J: helicopters or other rotary wing aircraft, unmanned or optionally piloted aircraft, or military aircraft, including demilitarized military aircraft.

What Does “Temporary Sojourn” Mean?

GL-J authorizes non-U.S. persons to reexport Eligible Aircraft to Iran on “temporary sojourn.” To qualify as a “temporary sojourn” under GL-J, the reexport transaction (i.e., the flight/voyage) must satisfy certain conditions, as follows:

Conditions on the Non-U.S. Person Operator. The non-U.S. person reexporter/operator of the Eligible Aircraft must retain the right to (i) hire and fire the cockpit crew; (ii) dispatch the Eligible Aircraft; (iii) determine the Eligible Aircraft’s routes; and (iv) perform or obtain the principal maintenance of the Eligible Aircraft. In addition, the non-U.S. person operator must ensure that there is no transfer of technology to an Iranian national ordinarily resident in Iran, except as provided below.

Conditions on the Eligible Aircraft. The Eligible Aircraft must (i) undergo principal maintenance outside of Iran, under the control of a party who is not an Iranian national ordinarily resident in Iran; (ii) remain registered outside Iran during the temporary sojourn (i.e., registration will not change while the Eligible Aircraft is in Iran); (iii) not bear the color, livery or logo of any Iranian air carrier; (iv) not carry a flight number issued to any Iranian air carrier; (v) not be equipped with, or used to transport, items that are military in nature; and (vi) be in Iran for no more than 72 hours on each voyage.

While these conditions generally authorize third-country operators to serve routes to and from Iran from the operator’s home base outside of Iran, they preclude entering into certain other transactions such as codeshare or leasing (e.g., wet, damp, dry) arrangements.

Authorization for Associated Repair and Maintenance Transactions

In addition to authorizing non-U.S. persons to reexport Eligible Aircraft to Iran on temporary sojourn, GL-J authorizes certain associated repair and maintenance transactions. These additional authorizations apply to spare parts, components and related technology that are subject to U.S. controls (e.g., due to U.S. origin or content).

To be eligible for reexport authorization under GL-J, the parts, components and technology must be classified under one of the following ECCNs: 9A991.c, 9A991.d, 9A991.e or 9E991. These ECCNs include the vast majority of commercial aircraft parts, components and technology, including most engines, but exclude, for example, hot section technology, most standard navigational and avionics equipment, and some standard aircraft communications-related equipment.

For eligible items, GL-J authorizes non-U.S. persons to:

  • reexport “usual and reasonable” quantities of these parts and components to Iran, onboard the Eligible Aircraft, provided that the items are “ordinarily incident and necessary for the proper operation of the Eligible Aircraft”
  • reexport technology for purposes of emergency maintenance on and/or repairs to an Eligible Aircraft, provided that the technology is “necessary to restore the aircraft to an airworthy condition.”

While these repair and maintenance authorizations may prove helpful in avoiding aircraft-on-ground (AOG) situations, they do not authorize the storing of any items in Iran, whether at a non-U.S. person’s own line station or otherwise, nor do they authorize transactions related to non-emergency maintenance on Eligible Aircraft in Iran.

Key Limitations

In addition to the conditions described above, certain other key limitations apply to the use of GL-J, as follows:

  • Cargo carriers must note that while GL-J may authorize their Eligible Aircraft to fly into Iran, it does not authorize the cargo that they carry to enter Iranian commerce. Such transactions require separate authorization if the cargo is subject to U.S. controls (and may require authorization from other competent government authorities). Failure to obtain such authorization creates liability not only for the shipper and consignee, but also for the freight forwarder, cargo carrier and any other party to the transaction—each of which may be held liable for an unauthorized transaction.
  • GL-J does not authorize dealings with restricted parties, such as those listed on OFAC’s list of Specially Designated Nationals, or any transaction involving restricted end-uses or end-users under U.S. export control laws (e.g., transactions involving weapons of mass destruction proliferation, foreign terrorist organizations or certain transactions involving parties listed on the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Entity List or Unverified List). GL-J also does not authorize transactions with any party whose export privileges have been denied under U.S. export control laws.
  • GL-J does not authorize non-U.S. persons to engage in any transactions with respect to aircraft—even Eligible Aircraft—or aircraft spare parts or components, if the non-U.S. person has knowledge or reason to know that an export violation has occurred with respect to those items.

In sum, GL-J authorizes straightforward transactions involving third-country commercial airlines wishing to serve Iran routes with Eligible Aircraft from the airline’s home base outside of Iran. However, even seemingly minor complications to these otherwise straightforward transactions may run afoul of GL-J’s conditions and preclude the airline’s ability to rely on GL-J. Please do not hesitate to reach out to us if you have any questions regarding this development.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

July 19, 2024

Views expressed by Alan Yanovich.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

February 9, 2023

With the enactment of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the announcement of the European Union (EU) Green Deal Industrial Plan, there is now a full-fledged subsidy war between the United States and the European Union. While these subsidies are meant to encourage green technologies, incentivizing firms to produce locally would seem to be an almost as important policy goal. And it is not limited to the U.S. and the EU. Global Trade Alert recently reported that, in 2022, production subsidies accounted for half of all trade-distorting measures, making it the mostly commonly used harmful trade policy measure.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-01-24

Washington, D.C. partner Kevin Wolf, London partner Jasper Helder and Emily Kilcrease with the Center for New American Security submitted a detailed comment to U.S. and EU export control authorities to help guide and inform efforts to rationalize U.S. and EU export controls.  It can also be a useful resource for anyone interested in the topic and wanting to understand the history and context to current export control policy issues. They note that the US-EU Joint Statement on the role and purpose of export controls “is far more significant than generally recognized because it is the first time the EU (represented by the EC) or any other US ally has stated so explicitly and publicly since the end of the Cold War an agreement with the US that export controls should be used to achieve country-specific and other policy objectives not directly related to weapons of mass destruction or conventional military items.”

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.