Congress Passes MTB Reform Legislation

May 26, 2016

Reading Time : 2 min

For more than three decades, the MTB has provided companies with an opportunity to reduce unnecessary overhead costs by reducing or eliminating duties on imported goods not made or commercially available domestically. The new, reformed MTB process provides greater certainty for U.S. companies, improving their competitiveness in the global marketplace.

What is the MTB?

The MTB is omnibus legislation typically containing hundreds of specific provisions to reduce or eliminate duties on imported products not made in the United States. Many of these products are inputs necessary to manufacture a finished product, though finished products can also be eligible for duty savings. 

To be eligible for inclusion in the MTB, each product must satisfy three general criteria:

  1. There must be no domestic production of the proposed MTB product (in some cases, a product may still be eligible despite domestic production, if no competing U.S. company objects).
  2. The cost to the U.S. Treasury from the loss of tariff revenue may be no greater than $500,000 in a calendar year.
  3. Inclusion of the product must generally be considered noncontroversial, which tends to means that no member of Congress objects.

The New MTB Process

In a departure from the past process for compiling the MTB, the new process now begins at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The key steps in the new process are as follows:   

  1. ITC Requests Petitions, October 15, 2016 – The ITC will announce the opening of a 60-day period in which persons may file petitions for proposed duty suspensions or reductions. The ITC will initiate the same process again on October 15, 2019, for the purpose of compiling the next MTB.
  2. Public Comment Period – After the 60-day period expires, but no later than January 13, 2017, the ITC will publish the submitted petitions and request public comments for a 45-day period.
  3. Preliminary Report to Congress – Between mid-April and mid-June, approximately 180 to 240 days after the initial October 15, 2016, petition announcement, the ITC will send to Congress a preliminary report of all filed petitions. The ITC’s report will offer a preliminary assessment of each product’s eligibility.
  4. Final Report to Congress – No later than 60 days (or no later than mid-July 2017) after submitting the preliminary report, the ITC shall submit a final report to Congress on each petition for a duty suspension or reduction.

Congressional Consideration of the MTB

After reviewing the ITC’s report, the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee will prepare MTB legislation based on the ITC’s recommendations. Importantly, Congress cannot insert new products to the ITC’s list of eligible products, but it may exclude products already on the list. There is no deadline for the introduction or enactment of MTB legislation. Any duty savings would become effective on a date specified in the eventual MTB legislation, which could occur as soon as the third or fourth quarter of 2017.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

July 19, 2024

Views expressed by Alan Yanovich.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

February 9, 2023

With the enactment of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the announcement of the European Union (EU) Green Deal Industrial Plan, there is now a full-fledged subsidy war between the United States and the European Union. While these subsidies are meant to encourage green technologies, incentivizing firms to produce locally would seem to be an almost as important policy goal. And it is not limited to the U.S. and the EU. Global Trade Alert recently reported that, in 2022, production subsidies accounted for half of all trade-distorting measures, making it the mostly commonly used harmful trade policy measure.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-01-24

Washington, D.C. partner Kevin Wolf, London partner Jasper Helder and Emily Kilcrease with the Center for New American Security submitted a detailed comment to U.S. and EU export control authorities to help guide and inform efforts to rationalize U.S. and EU export controls.  It can also be a useful resource for anyone interested in the topic and wanting to understand the history and context to current export control policy issues. They note that the US-EU Joint Statement on the role and purpose of export controls “is far more significant than generally recognized because it is the first time the EU (represented by the EC) or any other US ally has stated so explicitly and publicly since the end of the Cold War an agreement with the US that export controls should be used to achieve country-specific and other policy objectives not directly related to weapons of mass destruction or conventional military items.”

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.