EU Extends Current Sanctions Against Russia and Crimea

Jun 26, 2015

Reading Time : 2 min

Extension of Economic Sanctions Against Russia

On Monday, June 22, 2015, the Council of the European Union formally extended current economic sanctions against Russia by six months until January 31, 2016, citing continued instability in eastern Ukraine and Russia’s failure to fully implement the Minsk ceasefire agreement signed in February.  The sanctions, which were first implemented in July 2014, were amplified in September 2014, and were due to expire on July 31, 2015, include the following measures applicable to EU persons:

  • a prohibition on dealing in new bonds, equity or financial instruments with a maturity exceeding 30 days issued by certain targeted Russian banks, energy companies, defense companies and their non-EU subsidiaries
  • a prohibition on providing loans or credit with a  maturity exceeding 30 days to certain targeted Russian banks, energy companies, defense companies and their non-EU subsidiaries
  • export controls restricting exports of dual-use and military goods and technology to Russia
  • restrictions on exporting certain services and energy-related equipment and technology to Russia for use in deep water, arctic, and shale oil exploration and production projects.

Extension of Sanctions Targeting Crimea

On June 19, 2015, the Council of the European Union extended sanctions targeting the Crimea region of Ukraine until June 23, 2016.  These measures, which are applicable to EU persons, include:

  • a general prohibition on imports originating from Crimea and Sevastopol
  • a prohibition on investment in Crimea or Sevastopol
  • restrictions on providing tourism services in Crimea or Sevastopol
  • a ban on exporting to Crimean companies or for use in Crimea certain specified goods and technology related to the transportation, telecommunication and energy sectors or related to the production of oil, gas and mineral resources.

Potential for New U.S. and EU Sanctions Against Russia and Counter-Sanctions

In addition to the extension of current EU sanctions, the United States and European Union are reportedly considering a menu of other sanctions targeting Russia’s energy and financial sectors if the situation in eastern Ukraine continues to deteriorate.  According to the Associated Press, these proposed sanctions reportedly include new asset freezes and visa bans, measures designed to curtail Russia’s fuel exports, and restrictions that would bar Russian banks from international financial transactions and limit Russian companies from engaging in business overseas.  According to Secretary of State John Kerry, the decision on whether to impose additional sanctions against Russia “depends on what happens on the ground” in eastern Ukraine, and on Russia’s commitment to fully implementing the February Minsk cease-fire agreement.

Additionally, the Associated Press reports that in response to the EU’s extension of current sanctions, Russia has extended its current import ban on dairy products, meat, seafood, vegetables and fruit from the European Union, the United States, and other Western states until June 24, 2016. 

More Information

To see the Council Decision of June 22, 2015, implementing the extension of current economic sanctions against Russia, click here.

To see the Council Decision of June 19, 2015, implementing the extension of current sanctions targeting Crimea, click here

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

July 19, 2024

Views expressed by Alan Yanovich.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

February 9, 2023

With the enactment of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the announcement of the European Union (EU) Green Deal Industrial Plan, there is now a full-fledged subsidy war between the United States and the European Union. While these subsidies are meant to encourage green technologies, incentivizing firms to produce locally would seem to be an almost as important policy goal. And it is not limited to the U.S. and the EU. Global Trade Alert recently reported that, in 2022, production subsidies accounted for half of all trade-distorting measures, making it the mostly commonly used harmful trade policy measure.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-01-24

Washington, D.C. partner Kevin Wolf, London partner Jasper Helder and Emily Kilcrease with the Center for New American Security submitted a detailed comment to U.S. and EU export control authorities to help guide and inform efforts to rationalize U.S. and EU export controls.  It can also be a useful resource for anyone interested in the topic and wanting to understand the history and context to current export control policy issues. They note that the US-EU Joint Statement on the role and purpose of export controls “is far more significant than generally recognized because it is the first time the EU (represented by the EC) or any other US ally has stated so explicitly and publicly since the end of the Cold War an agreement with the US that export controls should be used to achieve country-specific and other policy objectives not directly related to weapons of mass destruction or conventional military items.”

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.