OFAC Clarifies Treatment of Deferred Payments, Oil and Gas “Production”

Dec 15, 2014

Reading Time : 3 min

FAQ 419 – Commercial Payment Terms with SSI Entities

Pursuant to Directives 1, 2 and 3 of the SSI List, U.S. persons are prohibited from engaging in transactions involving new debt of longer than either 30 or 90 days’ maturity and, in certain cases, are also prohibited from engaging in transactions of new equity. Whether the 30-or 90-day period applies depends on whether an SSI entity is designated pursuant to Directive 1, 2 or 3. OFAC has previously stated that prohibited extensions of debt include bonds, loans, extensions of credit, loan guarantees, letters of credit, drafts, bankers’ acceptances, discount notes or bills, or commercial paper.

FAQ 419 clarifies that U.S. persons may be prohibited from entering into deferred payment terms for commercial transactions with entities designated on the SSI List pursuant to Directives 1, 2 or 3 because such payment terms may constitute a prohibited extension of debt. Specifically, OFAC defines limits of payment terms that would not constitute prohibited “debt” as follows:

  • With respect to sales of goods, U.S. persons may “extend payment terms of up to 30 or 90 days from the point at which title or ownership of the goods transfers to the SSI entity.” 
  • With respect to the provision of services to, subscription arrangements involving, and progress payments for long-term projects involving SSI entities, U.S. persons may “extend payment terms of up to 30 or 90 days from the point at which a final invoice (or each final invoice) is issued.” 

This FAQ serves as an important reminder that these restrictions apply beyond large capital-market transactions. Indeed, U.S. persons must carefully review the terms of payment for all commercial transactions with SSI entities to determine whether they are prohibited under U.S. sanctions.

FAQ 420 – Clarification of the Term “Production”

Pursuant to Directive 4 of the SSI List, U.S. persons are prohibited from providing, exporting or reexporting, directly or indirectly, goods, services or technology in support of exploration or production for deepwater, Arctic offshore or shale projects that have the potential to produce oil in the Russian Federation or a maritime area claimed by the Russian Federation and extending from its territory, to SSI entities designated pursuant to Directive 4, their property or interests in property.

FAQ 420 explains that the term “production” in this Directive 4 refers to “the lifting of oil to the surface and the gathering, treating, field processing, and field storage of such oil.” The production stage ends “when extracted oil is transported out of a field production storage tank or otherwise off of a field production site.” Furthermore, the FAQ clarifies that Directive 4 does not restrict transactions limited to “transportation, refining, or other dealings involving oil that has already been extracted from a deepwater, Arctic offshore, or shale project and transported out of a field production storage tank or otherwise off of a field production site.”

Consequently, OFAC has clarified that this Directive applies to “upstream” activities and generally does not apply to the “midstream” and “downstream” oil and gas sector. For example, Directive 4 does not restrict U.S. persons from providing a vessel or other equipment to transport oil that was extracted from a deepwater project in Russia and that is no longer located at a field production site. This Directive also does not prohibit U.S. persons from being involved in the refining of such oil.

FAQ 420 – Clarification of the Term “Arctic Offshore”

As noted above, the prohibitions under Directive 4 of the SSI List apply to “deepwater,” “Arctic offshore” or “shale projects” with the potential to produce oil in the Russian Federation or in a maritime area claimed by the Russian Federation and extending from its territory. With the issuance of this FAQ, OFAC has now clarified the scope of all categories of projects subject to restrictions under Directive 4, as follows:

  • Deepwater: Projects involving underwater activities at depths of more than 500 feet (FAQ 413);
  • Arctic offshore: Projects that have the potential to produce oil in areas that involve drilling operations originating offshore and are located above the Arctic Circle;  however, the Directive does not apply to “horizontal drilling operations originating onshore where such drilling operations extend under the seabed to areas above the Arctic Circle” (FAQ 421)
  • Shale: Projects that have the potential to produce oil from resources located in shale formations; consequently, unless it is a “deepwater” or “Arctic offshore” project, Directive 4 does not apply to exploration or production through shale to locate or extract oil or gas in reservoirs (see FAQ 418).

The scope of the projects above generally aligns with the scope of the same projects under European Union sanctions against Russia.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

July 19, 2024

Views expressed by Alan Yanovich.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

February 9, 2023

With the enactment of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the announcement of the European Union (EU) Green Deal Industrial Plan, there is now a full-fledged subsidy war between the United States and the European Union. While these subsidies are meant to encourage green technologies, incentivizing firms to produce locally would seem to be an almost as important policy goal. And it is not limited to the U.S. and the EU. Global Trade Alert recently reported that, in 2022, production subsidies accounted for half of all trade-distorting measures, making it the mostly commonly used harmful trade policy measure.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-01-24

Washington, D.C. partner Kevin Wolf, London partner Jasper Helder and Emily Kilcrease with the Center for New American Security submitted a detailed comment to U.S. and EU export control authorities to help guide and inform efforts to rationalize U.S. and EU export controls.  It can also be a useful resource for anyone interested in the topic and wanting to understand the history and context to current export control policy issues. They note that the US-EU Joint Statement on the role and purpose of export controls “is far more significant than generally recognized because it is the first time the EU (represented by the EC) or any other US ally has stated so explicitly and publicly since the end of the Cold War an agreement with the US that export controls should be used to achieve country-specific and other policy objectives not directly related to weapons of mass destruction or conventional military items.”

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.