Sanctions Relief to Expect from the Nuclear Deal with Iran

July 15, 2015

Reading Time : 5 min

Below is a more detailed discussion of what to expect in the immediate term, the timing of sanctions relief, the types of sanctions that will be lifted, and the resulting impact on U.S., and non-U.S. parties, of dealing with Iran.

What to Expect in the Immediate Term

Within five days, President Obama is expected to submit the agreement to Congress, which will have 60 days to review and vote on a joint resolution of approval or disapproval. GOP leaders have stated that they will strongly oppose any nuclear agreement, because it does not take sufficient steps to curb the Iranian nuclear threat. At this point, the extent of Democratic support for the agreement is unclear. In any event, since the President has vowed to veto any legislation to block the nuclear agreement, Congress would need to garner a two-thirds majority to override a presidential veto and enact such legislation.

The United States is also expected to submit a draft UNSC resolution on behalf of the P5+1 and the EU. That may not occur until the Congressional review process is concluded. The UNSC resolution will endorse the JCPOA and replace all existing UNSC sanctions with the new restrictions contained in the agreement. Opposition in the UNSC—where the five veto-holding members are all JCPOA participants—is considered unlikely.

The JCPOA will come into effect 90 days after the UNSC adopts the resolution (“Adoption Day”). At that point, the IAEA can start its verification of Iran’s implementation of its nuclear-related commitments. Consequently, U.N. economic and financial sanctions will be terminated at once under this resolution, but not until “Implementation Day” (i.e., the date on which the IAEA verifies that Iran has implemented several nuclear commitments under the agreement).

Timing of Sanctions Relief

With the exception of continuing the terms of the Joint Plan of Action, which has been in place since November 24, 2013, the agreement does not grant any immediate sanctions relief under the U.S., EU or U.N. regimes. All of the U.N., U.S. and EU sanctions relief outlined in the JCPOA will happen “simultaneously” on Implementation Day. Conditional on IAEA verification of Iran’s nuclear commitments, President Obama will issue presidential waivers suspending those U. S. economic and financial sanctions outlined below. The EU will also take similar, but broader measures, at that time. Although the parties are aiming to achieve this by the end of the year, the timing remains unclear. Moreover, the sanctions relief is subject to “snap-back” in the event of significant non-performance by Iran of its commitments. 

“Nuclear-Related” Sanctions

Upon IAEA verification, the U.S. and EU will lift their “nuclear-related” sanctions against Iran. The agreement provides the complete list of U.S. and EU nuclear-related sanctions and restrictive measures that will be lifted. This list includes most EU sanctions against Iran. From the U.S. perspective, the sanctions to be eased are largely those “directed at non-U.S. persons.” Consequently, U.S. persons, including non-U.S. branches of U.S. companies and non-U.S. entities (e.g., subsidiaries, affiliates, joint ventures) owned or controlled by U.S. persons, will continue to be generally prohibited from conducting most transactions involving Iran without a license.

U.S. Sanctions Relief for Non-U.S. Firms

Consistent with the above, upon Implementation Day, the United States will suspend secondary sanctions that penalize non-U.S. entities and individuals who engage in certain activities with Iran. The relief particularly affects the following industries that are subject to U.S. secondary sanctions: finance/banking; insurance; energy; petrochemical; shipping, shipbuilding, and ports; gold and other precious metals; certain software and metals; and automotive. The United States will also remove sanctions targeted at certain designated individuals and entities, which will result in the release of frozen funds.

Of particular importance, non-U.S. financial institutions will be able to engage in transactions with, or involving, the Central Bank of Iran and Iranian financial institutions not on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List. The agreement also drops sanctions that prohibit transactions in the Iranian Rial or provide U.S. banknotes to the Iranian government.

Non-U.S. companies must bear in mind that U.S. persons, and entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons, will remain subject to stringent restrictions on direct or indirect dealings, with or involving, Iran. As such, transactions involving Iran should be rigorously scrutinized to ensure no U.S.-person involvement, including U.S. national employees or U.S. correspondent banks that may be processing U.S. dollar transactions.

U.S. Sanctions Relief for U.S. Firms

Most restrictions on U.S. individuals and entities will remain in effect, with few exceptions. One such exception is that the United States has agreed to license non-U.S. entities owned or controlled by a U.S. person to engage in activities with Iran that are consistent with the JCPOA. This presents potential opportunities for non-U.S. subsidiaries and affiliates of U.S. multinational corporations to, under certain conditions, engage in transactions in which their non-U.S. competitors are engaging.

The United States will also allow licensed sales by U.S. persons of commercial passenger aircraft and related parts and services to Iran, which presents a potentially significant business opportunity for U.S. aviation equipment companies to export equipment to Iran for use in civil aircraft. Licensed activities will need to include appropriate safeguards to ensure that the licensed aircraft, goods or services are not resold or retransferred to any person or entity on the SDN List. The agreement also allows for the licensing of imports to the United States of Iranian-origin carpets and foodstuff, including pistachios and caviar.

EU Sanctions Relief  

The EU has agreed to lift sanctions affecting Iran’s finance and insurance; oil and gas; and transportation sectors, among others. Unlike the United States, which is initially only suspending its sanctions, the EU is terminating these sanctions, in addition to unfreezing Iranian assets belonging to Iranian financial institutions, individuals and other organizations.

For financial institutions, the EU measures broadly lift “all sanctions” related to “banking activities, including the establishment of new correspondent banking relationships and the opening of new branches and subsidiaries of Iranian banks in the territories of EU Member States.”

Conclusion

In sum, the JCPOA does not immediately lift sanctions against Iran. Certain steps need to be completed before any relief will be implemented, including a political process within the United States, a UNSC resolution, various nuclear-related measures by Iran and verification by the IAEA.

Once these steps have taken place, most U.N. and EU sanctions against Iran will be lifted. While U.S. sanctions will be eased in their application to non-U.S. companies, these sanctions will continue to apply to U.S. persons, including entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons. Consequently, significant compliance risk will continue to apply with respect to transactions involving Iran.

In light of the above, U.S. and non-U.S. companies must closely analyze potential opportunities involving Iran to assess the compliance risk associated with the transaction, identify whether restrictions may apply, and determine whether licensing may be available. 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

July 19, 2024

Views expressed by Alan Yanovich.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

February 9, 2023

With the enactment of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the announcement of the European Union (EU) Green Deal Industrial Plan, there is now a full-fledged subsidy war between the United States and the European Union. While these subsidies are meant to encourage green technologies, incentivizing firms to produce locally would seem to be an almost as important policy goal. And it is not limited to the U.S. and the EU. Global Trade Alert recently reported that, in 2022, production subsidies accounted for half of all trade-distorting measures, making it the mostly commonly used harmful trade policy measure.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-01-24

Washington, D.C. partner Kevin Wolf, London partner Jasper Helder and Emily Kilcrease with the Center for New American Security submitted a detailed comment to U.S. and EU export control authorities to help guide and inform efforts to rationalize U.S. and EU export controls.  It can also be a useful resource for anyone interested in the topic and wanting to understand the history and context to current export control policy issues. They note that the US-EU Joint Statement on the role and purpose of export controls “is far more significant than generally recognized because it is the first time the EU (represented by the EC) or any other US ally has stated so explicitly and publicly since the end of the Cold War an agreement with the US that export controls should be used to achieve country-specific and other policy objectives not directly related to weapons of mass destruction or conventional military items.”

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.