U.S.-India Partnership: BIS Establishes Licensing Policy of General Approval, Expands Validated End-User Program

Jan 19, 2017

Reading Time : 4 min

Background on Authorization VEU

BIS created Authorization VEU in June 2007 to facilitate trade with civilian end users located in eligible destinations to which eligible dual-use items could be exported, reexported or transferred without a license. It allows exporters and reexporters to ship certain items on the Commerce Control List (CCL) to pre-approved facilities of validated end users under a general authorization without needing to apply for, and receive, an export license before shipping. India and China are presently the two eligible VEU destinations.

The VEU program is voluntary. Any entity in an eligible destination may apply for the VEU program, or exporters may apply on behalf of entities in eligible destinations. Validated end users are qualified through review by the End-User Review Committee (ERC), a group chaired by the Department of Commerce, with representation from the departments of State, Defense and Energy, and other agencies as appropriate. For each end user qualified by the ERC, approved facilities of that VEU are authorized to receive eligible items without a license. Applicants can choose which of their facilities to include in their applications for VEU status, and the items eligible for shipment to each VEU facility are specified in the individual entries found in Supplement No. 7 to Part 748 of the EAR. These are the only items that may be shipped to a given VEU facility under Authorization VEU. 

Changes to the India VEU Program

Today’s changes to the India VEU Program allow items obtained under Authorization VEU in India to be used for military end uses, rather than civil end uses only. (The VEU program for China is still limited to civil end uses only.) In particular, military end uses are now permissible to the extent that they do not involve items controlled for missile technology reasons, or uses in nuclear, missile, or chemical or biological weapons activities.

In evaluating an end user for VEU eligibility, the ERC will consider factors such as the entity’s record of experience and compliance with U.S. export controls, the entity’s consent for the U.S. government to conduct periodic on-site reviews at VEU facilities, and the entity’s relationships with U.S. and foreign companies. 

Changes to Licensing Policy

Additionally, today’s rulemaking establishes a presumption of approval for exports and reexports to, and transfers within, India of items subject to the EAR, including “600 series” military items, for civil or military end uses in India or for the ultimate end use by the Government of India, for reexport to a Country Group A:5 country (NATO and other closely allied countries), or for return to the United States, so long as such items are not for use in nuclear, missile, or chemical or biological weapons activities. Previously, BIS maintained a policy of case-by-case review. 

Significance of Changes

Today’s rulemaking concludes the Obama administration’s steady efforts toward enhancing defense and security cooperation with India.  In recognizing India as a “Major Defense Partner” on June 7, 2016, the United States pledged “to work toward facilitating technology sharing with India to a level commensurate with that of its closest allies and partners.”1 This commitment came in the context of an ongoing, deepening U.S.-India defense and security relationship, rooted in the 2005 New Framework for the U.S.-India Defense Relationship, the U.S.-India Strategic Dialogue established in 2010, the Defense Technology and Trade Initiative established in 2012, and the 2015 Framework for the U.S.-India Defense Relationship. Congress further reiterated the underlying objectives of these endeavors in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Section 1292, “Enhancing Defense and Security Cooperation with India”).

While the new licensing policy does not remove any licensing requirements, it mimics the scope of License Exception Strategic Trade Authorization (STA), a license exception created as part of the President’s Export Control Reform initiative to facilitate trade in most defense and dual-use items by and among the United States and its close allies. India is not eligible for License Exception STA treatment under current U.S. policy because it is not a member of the four multilateral export control regimes. India is, however, seeking membership in the four regimes, an effort the Obama administration has supported.

Although the preparation and submission of an application to become a VEU takes some effort, becoming a VEU can significantly reduce regulatory burdens and delays for those entities that have, or expect to have, a significant volume or regular trade with the United States in controlled items. To date, only one Indian company has applied for VEU status. The U.S. government clearly believes that expanding the VEU program to include the production of military and other items in India will encourage other Indian companies to participate in the program and, thus, further enhance the defense, aerospace, satellite and other trade relationships with the United States. We continue to advise clients doing business in India and recommend that companies assess their opportunities in India in light of today’s regulatory changes. 


1 https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/06/07/joint-statement-united-states-and-india-enduring-global-partners-21st

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

July 19, 2024

Views expressed by Alan Yanovich.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

February 9, 2023

With the enactment of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the announcement of the European Union (EU) Green Deal Industrial Plan, there is now a full-fledged subsidy war between the United States and the European Union. While these subsidies are meant to encourage green technologies, incentivizing firms to produce locally would seem to be an almost as important policy goal. And it is not limited to the U.S. and the EU. Global Trade Alert recently reported that, in 2022, production subsidies accounted for half of all trade-distorting measures, making it the mostly commonly used harmful trade policy measure.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-01-24

Washington, D.C. partner Kevin Wolf, London partner Jasper Helder and Emily Kilcrease with the Center for New American Security submitted a detailed comment to U.S. and EU export control authorities to help guide and inform efforts to rationalize U.S. and EU export controls.  It can also be a useful resource for anyone interested in the topic and wanting to understand the history and context to current export control policy issues. They note that the US-EU Joint Statement on the role and purpose of export controls “is far more significant than generally recognized because it is the first time the EU (represented by the EC) or any other US ally has stated so explicitly and publicly since the end of the Cold War an agreement with the US that export controls should be used to achieve country-specific and other policy objectives not directly related to weapons of mass destruction or conventional military items.”

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.