US State Department Releases Contingent Waivers of Iran Extraterritorial Sanctions

Oct 21, 2015

Reading Time : 2 min

Below we provide a brief description of the contingent waivers, as well as corresponding FAQs issued by OFAC.

A. State Department Waivers

Pursuant to the JCPOA, the contingent waivers issued by the State Department will waive most extraterritorial sanctions that target non-U.S. persons not owned or controlled by U.S. persons who engage in certain activities with Iran. The relief particularly affects the following industries that are subject to U.S. extraterritorial sanctions: energy; shipping, shipbuilding, and ports; industrial; finance/banking; insurance; gold and other precious metals; certain software and metals; and automotive. 

Specifically, on Implementation Day, the contingent waivers will waive sanctions on non-U.S. persons not owned or controlled by U.S. persons that engage in the following non-exhaustive list of activities specified in the JCPOA:

  • financial and banking transactions with specified Iranian banks and financial institutions, including the Central Bank of Iran
  • transactions in Iranian Rial
  • provisions of U.S. banknotes to the Government of Iran
  • transfers of Iranian revenues abroad
  • purchase of, subscription to or facilitation of the issuance of Iranian sovereign debt, including governmental bonds
  • financial messaging services to the Central Bank of Iran and certain Iranian financial institutions
  • underwriting services, insurance or reinsurance
  • transactions related to Iran’s export of crude oil
  • investment in, and support for, Iran’s oil, gas and petrochemical sectors
  • purchase, acquisition, sale, transportation or marketing of petroleum, petrochemical products and natural gas from Iran
  • export, sale or provision of refined petroleum products and petrochemical products to Iran
  • transactions with Iran’s energy sector
  • transactions with Iran’s shipping/shipbuilding sectors and port operators
  • trade in gold and other precious metals
  • trade with Iran in graphite; raw or semifinished metals, such as aluminum and steel; coal; and software for integrating industrial processes
  • sale, supply or transfer of goods and services used in connection with Iran’s automotive sector.

Importantly, these contingent waivers will not permit non-U.S. persons to engage in transactions with “Specially Designated Nationals” (SDNs). However, pursuant to the JCPOA, OFAC is expected to remove a large number of Iranian entities (listed in Attachment 3 to Annex II of the JCPOA) from the SDN List on Implementation Day.

B. OFAC FAQs

Additionally, on October 18, OFAC issued corresponding FAQs clarifying that the above contingent waivers do not take effect until “Implementation Day,” when “the IAEA verifies that Iran has implemented [its] commitments under the JCPOA.” OFAC reiterated that the current sanctions regime remains in place and warned that both U.S. persons and non-U.S. persons should not execute agreements prior to Implementation Day that obligate them to participate in transactions that are currently prohibited, even if these obligations are merely executory and not effective and binding until Implementation Day. Specifically, OFAC states that “entering into contracts involving Iran or its government before Implementation Day may be sanctionable,” including contracts “that are contingent on the implementation of sanctions relief under the JCPOA.” Additionally, OFAC emphasized that, “unless authorized by OFAC, U.S. persons are prohibited from entering into contracts— contingent or otherwise—involving Iran or its government, including with individuals and entities on the SDN List.”

OFAC also stated that it “intends to publish on its website prior to Implementation Day detailed guidance and information on the implementation of U.S. commitments with respect to sanctions under the JCPOA.” This guidance will presumably include information on the General License that OFAC is expected to provide that will permit non-U.S. persons owned or controlled by U.S. persons to engage in certain activities “consistent with the JCPOA.”

*This blog post was originally on AG Trade Law. 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

July 19, 2024

Views expressed by Alan Yanovich.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

February 9, 2023

With the enactment of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the announcement of the European Union (EU) Green Deal Industrial Plan, there is now a full-fledged subsidy war between the United States and the European Union. While these subsidies are meant to encourage green technologies, incentivizing firms to produce locally would seem to be an almost as important policy goal. And it is not limited to the U.S. and the EU. Global Trade Alert recently reported that, in 2022, production subsidies accounted for half of all trade-distorting measures, making it the mostly commonly used harmful trade policy measure.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-01-24

Washington, D.C. partner Kevin Wolf, London partner Jasper Helder and Emily Kilcrease with the Center for New American Security submitted a detailed comment to U.S. and EU export control authorities to help guide and inform efforts to rationalize U.S. and EU export controls.  It can also be a useful resource for anyone interested in the topic and wanting to understand the history and context to current export control policy issues. They note that the US-EU Joint Statement on the role and purpose of export controls “is far more significant than generally recognized because it is the first time the EU (represented by the EC) or any other US ally has stated so explicitly and publicly since the end of the Cold War an agreement with the US that export controls should be used to achieve country-specific and other policy objectives not directly related to weapons of mass destruction or conventional military items.”

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.