National Institutes of Health Develops AI Algorithm to Identify Potential Volunteers for Clinical Trials

November 25, 2024

Reading Time : 2 min

Researchers from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have developed an algorithm that harnesses AI to help accelerate the process of matching potential volunteers for relevant clinical research trials. The algorithm, called TrialGPT, is intended to help clinicians navigate the vast range of clinical trials available to patients by identifying potential matches and providing a summary of how that person meets the criteria for study enrollment. The team of researchers used a large language model (LLM) to develop an innovative framework for TrialGPT and compared the algorithm to the results of three human clinicians who analyzed over 1,000 patient-criterion pairs. The team also conducted a pilot user study, where two human clinicians reviewed six anonymous patient summaries and matched them to potentially suitable clinical trials. When clinicians used TrialGPT as a starting point, they spent 40% less time screening patients and maintained the same level of accuracy. The research team was selected for the Director’s Challenge Innovation Award, which will allow the team to further assess the model’s performance and fairness in real-world clinical settings. The researchers “anticipate that this work could make clinical trial recruitment more effective and help reduce barriers to participation for populations underrepresented in clinical research.”

A tool similar to TrialGPT could be used by life sciences companies as they work to ensure that patient selection for their research studies is adequately diverse. One of FDA’s priorities is to advance health equity by promoting clinical trial diversity. Participants in clinical trials should represent the patients that will use the medical products, but that is often not the case. FDA has issued recommendations to improve inclusion of underrepresented populations in clinical trials, including guidance in 2019 and 2020. Now under the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022 (FDORA), sponsors must submit “Diversity Action Plans” for certain clinical studies in the form and manner specified by FDA. These Diversity Action Plans are intended to increase enrollment of participants who are members of historically underrepresented populations in clinical studies to help improve the strength and generalizability of the evidence for the intended use population. As part of the agency’s June 2024 draft guidance regarding Diversity Action Plans, FDA offered examples of ways sponsors could satisfy the requirement to explain how the sponsor plans to meet specified enrollment goals, including community engagement, improving access by selecting sites that serve demographically diverse populations, employing clinical study decentralization when appropriate, and improving study awareness. One way to expand study awareness among clinicians and patients would be to employ an algorithm like TrialGPT.

Although all AI/ML-enabled medical devices would not necessarily be required to submit Diversity Action Plans under FDORA (the requirement only applies to device studies requiring an Investigational Device Exemption), FDA has repeatedly warned of the risk of the potential for bias in AI/ML-based medical devices. Perhaps another AI tool that helps to identify suitable study participants from underrepresented populations could be used to address algorithmic bias.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

April 2, 2025

On March 31, 2025, Judge Sean D. Jordan of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an opinion and judgment in American Clinical Laboratory Association v. FDA. Judge Jordan’s decision vacates and sets aside the Food & Drug Administration’s (FDA) final rule, Medical Devices; Laboratory Developed Tests (the LDT Rule).1 The LDT Rule would have required laboratories offering LDTs to meet medical device requirements. The preamble to the LDT Rule provided a multi-stage phase out of FDA’s enforcement discretion policy, under which the first set of regulatory requirements would have been actively enforced beginning May 6. While many labs are breathing a sigh of relief after the publication of this order, questions remain as to how the agency will proceed and the broader implications for regulation of lab tests and in vitro diagnostics generally.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 24, 2025

In the past week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in collaboration with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced three new initiatives related to food safety and food supply chain transparency. Outlined below, these new initiatives align with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s recent announcements to focus on bolstering food safety, including the recent directive to the FDA to explore the revision of the longstanding Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) rule.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 12, 2025

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has updated its website to provide new information on data integrity concerns relating to medical devices.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 12, 2025

United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kennedy recently directed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to consider rulemaking to revise its longstanding regulations and guidance governing the oversight of food ingredients to eliminate the ability of individuals and companies to self-affirm that their ingredients are Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS). This would mark a massive shift in how new food ingredients are introduced to the market.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

January 21, 2025

In the final stretch of the Biden administration, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) laid the groundwork for continued engagement with the public on two challenging areas of product development, each of which is of high interest to patients, clinical communities, industry stakeholders and policy-makers in Congress.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

January 17, 2025

On January 6, 2025, the FDA released final guidance for industry entitled “Communications From Firms to Health Care Providers Regarding Scientific Information on Unapproved Uses of Approved/Cleared Medical Products: Questions and Answers.” The guidance outlines FDA’s enforcement policy concerning certain firm-initiated communications of scientific information on unapproved uses (SIUU) of the firm’s approved or cleared medical products to health care providers involved in prescribing or administering those products to individual patients. It finalizes the October 2023 draft guidance, which itself revised draft guidance from 2014 and 2009. The latest guidance is not for current implementation and is pending the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) approval of the guidance’s information collection provisions.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

January 16, 2025

On January 15, 2025, FDA announced an order revoking the listings providing for the use of the color additive FD&C Red No. 3 in both foods (including dietary supplements) and ingested drugs. The order is in response to a 2022 petition filed by the Center for Science in the Public Interest, among other food safety and health advocates, which asserted that the additive induces cancer in male rats and urged the agency to revoke authorization. 

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

January 14, 2025

On January 7, the FDA made available draft guidance on the development of drugs and biological products for weight reduction within the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research intended for reduction and long-term maintenance of body weight in patients with obesity or who are overweight. Notably, this draft guidance includes recommendations with respect to the clinical assessment of weight reduction drugs in both adults and pediatric patients, revising and replacing the draft guidance for industry “Developing Products for Weight Management” issued in February 2007. 

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.