Three Questions with Sedgwick’s Jeremy Schutz

December 4, 2024Three Questions

Reading Time : 2 min

In this edition of Three Questions, health care & life sciences partner Nate Brown spoke with Jeremy Schutz, director of business development, recall & remediation at Sedgwick, to explore key strategies that pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers can adopt to mitigate risks related to supply chain disruptions, cybersecurity threats and increased FDA enforcement of quality control and compliance.

Sedgwick is the world’s leading expert in product recall and remediation spanning over 7,000 recalls, in 100 countries, and 50 languages.

What operational strategies can pharmaceutical companies adopt to mitigate the risks of supply chain disruptions?

In 2024, supply chain disruptions continue to be a significant risk for pharmaceutical companies, especially in the context of global component and ingredient shortages and transportation challenges. Companies should adopt a risk-based approach by diversifying their supplier base, investing in domestic production and building stronger supplier relationships to improve resilience. Real-time supply chain monitoring through digital tools like blockchain can help companies track and predict potential bottlenecks. For 2025, stakeholders should watch for increased regulatory pressure from the FDA to ensure supply chain transparency and resilience, particularly for essential drugs and devices critical to patient health.

How can medical device manufacturers minimize the risk of cybersecurity threats?

With the FDA’s new and stricter cybersecurity regulations, medical device manufacturers face increased risks. Manufacturers must integrate cybersecurity protocols early in the product development process, ensuring compliance with FDA guidelines for cybersecurity risk management. This includes secure software development, regular updates, vulnerability monitoring and patch management. Manufacturers should also establish post-market cybersecurity monitoring programs. Looking ahead to 2025, the FDA is expected to intensify its focus on artificial intelligence (AI)-driven medical devices and cybersecurity for wearables, which will require manufacturers to maintain a proactive cybersecurity strategy to prevent costly disruptions and recalls.

How can life sciences companies mitigate the risks associated with increased FDA enforcement of quality control and compliance?

In 2024, the FDA has ramped up inspections and enforcement actions, especially related to quality control in manufacturing processes for both pharmaceuticals and medical devices. To mitigate risks, companies should implement continuous quality improvement (CQI) processes, ensuring that manufacturing standards meet Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and FDA regulations. This includes regular internal audits, employee training on compliance and investing in digital quality management systems (QMS) that provide real-time monitoring and documentation of production processes. As we approach 2025, companies should anticipate more FDA scrutiny on data integrity and digital record-keeping, making it essential to maintain robust data security and transparency throughout the product lifecycle.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

January 2, 2025

On December 30, 2024, FDA unveiled an Idea Lab as part of its Home as a Health Care Hub initiative to reimagine how new and existing medical devices can be incorporated in a home environment.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

December 16, 2024

On December 12, 2024, FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) announced a new CDER Center for Real-World Evidence Innovation (CCRI). The CCRI is intended to serve as the focal point to promote more efficient and consistent communications across CDER offices regarding real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE).

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

December 6, 2024

On December 5, 2024, FDA unveiled the draft guidance for industry regarding accelerated approval for drugs and biologics. This guidance provides additional information regarding the development of drugs and biologics to treat serious conditions for which there is an unmet need, and for which the sponsor is seeking accelerated approval. In particular, the guidance details the conditions for confirmatory study or studies that sponsors are required to conduct under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023. This guidance also elaborates on the process for the expedited withdrawal of an accelerated approval. In announcing the availability of the draft guidance, the agency has requested comments be submitted by February 4, 2025.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

December 4, 2024

Today FDA issued final guidance to provide recommendations for predetermined change control plans (PCCPs) tailored to artificial intelligence (AI) enabled device software functions. FDA recognizes that development of AI-enabled devices is an iterative process, and PCCPs are intended to allow developers to plan for modifications, while continuing to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. FDA provides that a PCCP should include planned modifications, a methodology to develop, validate and implement those modifications, and an assessment of an impact of those modifications. FDA initially introduced the concept of PCCPs in a 2019 white paper, and the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022 created provisions regarding PCCPs. For example, a supplemental application for a device that received Pre-Market Approval (PMA) or a new 510(k) is not required for a change to a device that would otherwise require a PMA supplement or a new 510(k) if the change is consistent with a PCCP approved or cleared by FDA. This final guidance is specific to AI-enabled devices, although PCCPs may be submitted for devices other than AI-enabled devices, and FDA has issued draft guidance that applies more broadly to all devices.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

December 4, 2024

In this edition of Three Questions, health care & life sciences partner Nate Brown spoke with Jeremy Schutz, director of business development, recall & remediation at Sedgwick, to explore key strategies that pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers can adopt to mitigate risks related to supply chain disruptions, cybersecurity threats and increased FDA enforcement of quality control and compliance.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

December 2, 2024

On November 19, 2024, FDA issued a request for information (RFI) on per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in seafood. Specifically, the agency is seeking scientific data and information from the seafood industry and other stakeholders and experts (e.g., academia, state and other federal agencies), on PFAS concentrations in seafood, the surrounding environment and processing water. The agency is also looking for mitigation strategies for reducing exposure to PFAS in seafood.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

November 25, 2024

AdvaMed, the world’s largest medical technology association representing device, diagnostics and digital technology companies, released a white paper that reviews the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications and products in the health care sector, and identifies steps to accelerate the use of AI in medical technologies. The trade association highlights two main types of tasks that AI is uniquely well suited to tackle (1) identifying and analyzing patterns in patient charts that practitioners might miss; and (2) automating repetitive routine tasks. AI is being incorporated into a range of technologies in the health care sector, and AdvaMed’s white paper focuses primarily on AI/machine learning (ML)-enabled medical devices, which are regulated by the FDA. AdvaMed anticipates that FDA will likely need to issue additional guidance to keep pace with development of AI models, including for adaptive models and approaches to mitigating bias. AdvaMed endorses FDA’s use of “Predetermined Change Control Plans” (PCCPs), which permit manufacturers to outline approaches to future modifications as part of an initial submission, and states that PCCPs should evolve to allow for greater post-market modifications for adaptive algorithms. The trade association also calls for domestic and international harmonization of requirements, including development of common AI standards to advance safe, secure and trustworthy use of AI.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

November 25, 2024

On November 21, 2024, FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) announced a pilot program aimed at improving public notice about potentially high‑risk medical device recalls.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.