LaborSpeak: New York Bill Will Ban Non-Competes

June 22, 2023

Reading Time : 2 min

A bill banning non-compete agreements in New York was passed this week by the New York State Legislature. In this installment of LaborSpeak, we discuss the potential ramifications for employers if it is signed into law by the governor.

Our LaborSpeak video series examines critical trends and issues affecting employers nationwide. We invite you to subscribe to our YouTube channel, and you will be alerted as we drop new videos in the future.

Transcript

This week, the New York State Legislature passed a bill that would ban non-competes in New York It now heads to the Governor to decide if it will be signed into law. If signed, it would take effect 30 days later. The governor has previously supported the idea of limiting non-competes in New York. We anticipate the bill may get signed, even though, in its current form, it goes further than what many were expecting.

We understand that certain groups have already reached out to the Governor's office to advocate for limits to the bill before it becomes law, such as the salary thresholds we have seen in other states. The bill, as currently drafted, would ban employers from entering into non-competes with anyone who performs services for them. There are no salary thresholds, exemption for certain positions, or carve outs for the sale of business or equity awards. The bill also copies language from California's non-compete statute, stating that any contract clause that restrains someone from engaging in a profession, trade or business is void. This is relevant because this same language has been interpreted by California courts to also prohibit certain forms of non-solicit and confidentiality covenants. Individuals would have the right to file a lawsuit for any violation. They could recover lost compensation, liquidated damages up to Ten Thousand Dollars, and attorneys' fees and costs.

There's some conflicting language about whether the ban is intended to be prospective, or retroactive. The bill summary states it's intended to void current non-compete agreements, but other language says it would only apply to contracts "entered into or modified" 30 days after it's signed into law. This bill would alter the restrictive covenant landscape in New York. It's part of the nationwide trend against non-competes that we've discussed in prior videos.

We'll continue to keep you updated. Employers that use non-competes in New York should reach out to discuss alternatives and what this could mean for their agreements.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

LaborSpeak

November 7, 2024

In this installment of LaborSpeak, we discuss important updates to state laws that enhance protections for employees who are pregnant.

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

November 6, 2024

New York voters just passed Proposition One, also called the New York Equal Rights Amendment, expanding protections under the state constitution’s equal protection clause for public employers. The state constitution will now prohibit discrimination based on race, color, ethnicity, national origin, age, disability, creed, religion or sex—including sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes and reproductive healthcare and autonomy.

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

September 10, 2024

In this installment of LaborSpeak, we discuss the details of the recent Texas federal court ruling setting aside the FTC’s nationwide non-compete ban and what may happen next.  

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

August 21, 2024

On August 20, the Northern District of Texas held that the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) rule banning non-competes was unlawful and set the rule aside on a nationwide basis.  As a result, the rule will not be enforced or take effect.

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

July 24, 2024

On July 23, a judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied a company’s motion to stay the September 4 effective date of and preliminarily enjoin the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) rule banning non-competes for almost all employees and independent contractors (the Rule).

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

July 8, 2024

On July 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas enjoined the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) from enforcing and implementing its rule banning non-competes and stayed the September 4 effective date of the rule against Ryan LLC, a tax services firm that sued the FTC over the rule. The court provided the same relief for several other parties that intervened in the case.

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

May 16, 2024

In this installment of LaborSpeak, we discuss a new state law affecting pay transparency and how it fits into the growing list of jurisdictions with similar requirements.

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

April 24, 2024

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has approved a final rule that would void and ban almost all worker non-compete agreements in the United States. However, the rule is already facing legal challenges and injunction efforts, with more likely to come, as critics question the FTC's legal authority to issue such a rule. In this installment of LaborSpeak, we provide a brief summary of the rule and discuss what employers need to know now.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.