LaborSpeak: Update on California Arbitration Agreements

March 1, 2023

Reading Time : 2 min

In this installment of LaborSpeak, we discuss recent updates regarding California arbitration agreements.

Our LaborSpeak video series examines critical trends and issues affecting employers nationwide. We invite you to subscribe to our YouTube channel, and you will be alerted as we drop new videos in the future.

Transcript

Foreign employers can once again require employees to sign arbitration agreements as a condition of their employment on February 15 2023 a divided ninth circuit panel ruled the federal arbitration act for the FAA preempts to 2019 California law which prohibited employers from requiring job applicants or employees to resolve legal disputes for private arbitration rather than in court the FAA is a federal law allowing for private dispute resolution through arbitration California publicly noted that its 2019 law prohibiting arbitration for employment disputes was specifically drafted to avoid Federal preemption by focusing this new law on the formation of mandatory arbitration agreements and not on the enforceability of signed agreements however California's attempt ultimately failed when the ninth circuit ruled that the FAA preempts the state rule that limits or prevents parties from entering into arbitration agreements in the first place and that the law imposed a severe burden on contract formation California was the first state to at the time successfully ban mandatory arbitration of most employment related disputes before this New York New Jersey and Washington had tried to pass similar laws however these states went even further and attempted to restrict arbitration causes for all forms of workplace discrimination claims federal courts found those laws to be preempted by the FAA the ninth circuit decision striking down California's law was not a unanimous decision and there was still an Avenue for the bill to be restored California could ask the full ninth circuit or even the Supreme Court to review the panel's decision the dissenting judge specifically acknowledged that the Supreme Court has never held or implied that employers can require arbitration as a condition of employment employers should remember that as of March 2022 a federal law prohibits employers Nationwide for mandating pre-dispute arbitration agreements for sexual assault and harassment claims employers with arbitration agreements may want to confirm the status of any laws prohibiting such agreements in states where they have employees in addition to applicable federal law if you have questions about arbitration agreements or any other labor matters please reach out to a member of our labor and employment team

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

LaborSpeak

February 12, 2025

In this installment of LaborSpeak, we discuss Attorney General Pamela Bondi’s memo setting forth the Department of Justice’s plan to investigate, eliminate, and penalize illegal DEI and DEIA activities in both the private sector and in educational institutions that receive federal funds. 

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

February 3, 2025

In this installment of LaborSpeak, we discuss some of the major changes in the labor & employment legal and regulatory landscape that employers should anticipate under the second Trump administration.

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

January 16, 2025

In this installment of LaborSpeak, we discuss the evolving political and legal landscape around diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs and practices.  

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

November 7, 2024

In this installment of LaborSpeak, we discuss important updates to state laws that enhance protections for employees who are pregnant.

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

November 6, 2024

New York voters just passed Proposition One, also called the New York Equal Rights Amendment, expanding protections under the state constitution’s equal protection clause for public employers. The state constitution will now prohibit discrimination based on race, color, ethnicity, national origin, age, disability, creed, religion or sex—including sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes and reproductive healthcare and autonomy.

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

September 10, 2024

In this installment of LaborSpeak, we discuss the details of the recent Texas federal court ruling setting aside the FTC’s nationwide non-compete ban and what may happen next.  

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

August 21, 2024

On August 20, the Northern District of Texas held that the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) rule banning non-competes was unlawful and set the rule aside on a nationwide basis.  As a result, the rule will not be enforced or take effect.

...

Read More

LaborSpeak

July 24, 2024

On July 23, a judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied a company’s motion to stay the September 4 effective date of and preliminarily enjoin the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) rule banning non-competes for almost all employees and independent contractors (the Rule).

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.