DC Circuit Decision Opens Doors to Rate Increases by FERC-Regulated Oil, Liquids and Refined Products Pipelines

July 31, 2024

Reading Time : 5 min

Interstate oil, liquid and refined products pipelines regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) will soon be able to raise their transportation rates (provided they were set using FERC’s popular Index rate methodology) in the wake of a significant new decision by the District of Columbia Circuit (the D.C. Circuit) in Liquid Energy Pipeline Association v. FERC (LEPA).

In LEPA, the D.C. Circuit held that FERC violated the Administrative Procedure Act’s (APA) notice-and-comment rulemaking requirement when FERC reduced the five-year Index rate it had approved in a December 2020 order in a subsequent order on rehearing issued in January 2022. The higher Index rates (which had been approved previously by FERC in December 2020) had already taken effect on July 1, 2021. Yet, on rehearing, FERC ordered their prospective reduction beginning in March 2022. The court explained that the APA lacks an “omnibus rehearing exception” to its notice-and-comment requirements that would allow for a substantive change to an existing rule, including the rate reduction. Because the rule had become legally binding and enforceable on July 1, 2021, any substantive revision required a new notice-and-comment period before taking effect—such that FERC could not simply rely on the notice-and-comment period that preceded the original December 2020 order.

By way of remedy, the court ordered FERC to reinstate the higher rates permitted by the December 2020 order. This could result in pipelines surcharging their shippers to recover the difference in rates they would have been able to charge had the rehearing order never issued.

Background

The FERC rate Index methodology is the primary rate setting methodology used by oil, liquid and refined products pipelines regulated under the Interstate Commerce Act (ICA). Created to abide by a mandate in the Energy Policy Act of 1992 that FERC establish a “simplified and generally applicable ratemaking methodology for oil pipelines,” the Index methodology uses an inflation-adjusted rate ceiling to allow pipelines to raise or lower rates without filing a cost-of-service justification. FERC initiates a notice-and-comment proceeding every five years to revisit the rate Index ceiling to ensure that rates are consistent with changes in inflation. This process is complemented by an annual rate setting process that also fluctuates based on inflation, with pipelines permitted to set new rates on July 1 every year.

Typically, FERC sets the five-year Index using the so-called Kahn methodology. This methodology uses a dataset comprising regulated ICA pipelines’ filed data from the prior five-year period to calculate each pipeline’s cost change on a per barrel-mile basis, trimmed to remove statistical outliers. FERC then calculates a composite by averaging the median, the mean and a weighted mean of the data set. The difference between this composite and the Producer Price Index for Finished Goods (PPI-FG) over the prior five-year period is then measured, and the index level is set at PPI-FG plus (or minus) this differential. While the Kahn methodology is largely consistent, FERC can vary the outcome by trimming the data set used to set the Index to either the middle 50% or middle 80%.

In June 2020, FERC initiated the ratemaking proceeding to set the current five-year Index, which covers the period from July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2026. Regulated pipelines and their aligned interests advocated for an Index rate based on use of the middle 80%. They also asked FERC to reject calls to reduce the Index to account for 2018 policy changes that prevented pipelines organized as master limited partnerships from recovering an income tax adjustment in their rates. In a December 2020 order, FERC agreed and set the Index level at PPI-FG+0.78%. This was higher than the initially proposed rate Index of PPI-FG+0.9% provided in FERC’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR).

Shipper interests sought substantive rehearing in January 2021 and FERC issued a so-called “tolling” order in February 2021 indicating that it would rule on their request at a later date. FERC ultimately issued its rehearing order in January 2022, after FERC regained its full compliment of five Commissioners, and had a 3-2 Democratic majority. The rehearing order determined that the proper Index rate was actually PPI-FG-0.21%, a drop of nearly 1 percentage point, and lower even than the NOPR’s proposed Index rate. In the interim, the higher Index rates had already been in effect for over six months. FERC did not order the pipelines to refund the difference during that period, but directed each pipeline to reduce their rates prospectively effective March 1, 2022.

LEPA marks the third time in two weeks that FERC has lost before the D.C. Circuit on account of an APA violation. But LEPA is unique because it concerns FERC’s authority to set rates under the ICA, which, unlike other statutes administered by FERC, has no judicial review provision, making the APA the default source of the cause of action and applicable standard. This allowed the pipeline interests to raise their notice-and-comment challenge directly to the court rather than raising it first with FERC.

Impact of LEPA on the Oil, Liquids and Refined Products Pipeline Industry

Approximately 75% of oil pipeline rates are set using the Index methodology. Moreover, FERC requires ICA-regulated pipelines to set their rates using the Index, subject to certain limited exceptions. This makes the five-year Index the most important FERC-initiated rulemaking to the oil, liquids and refined products pipeline community. When set correctly, the Index creates cost efficiency incentives and encourages pipelines to control their costs. To the extent it offers efficient pipelines the opportunity to earn an additional return on equity, it also provides pipeline operators and their shippers with predictability and stability. Hence, the court’s order directing FERC to revert to a rate set nearly four years ago is certain to create disruptions in the pipeline community.

It should be noted that the five-year Index sets a rate ceiling. Thus, while after LEPA pipelines will be permitted to increase their rates up to the ceiling, they are not required to do so. Because the mandate from the D.C. Circuit will not issue until mid-September, assuming FERC does not file for rehearing, it will still be several months before pipelines can file for related rate increases. We also would expect FERC to issue a ministerial order that affirms the court’s decision and directs the granted relief before any further action is taken on rates. However, there may be future disputes as to whether pipelines can surcharge their shippers for rate differential between March 2022 and the higher rates, much in the way shippers had argued for refunds between July 1, 2021, and February 28, 2022, after FERC reduced the rates in the January 2022 rehearing order. Thus, the pipeline community will be looking to FERC for clear direction in the coming weeks and months.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

February 13, 2025

Oil & gas companies continue to identify and capitalize on opportunities related to the deployment of new energy technologies, with their approaches broadly maturing and coalescing around maximizing synergies, leveraging available subsidies and responding to regulatory drivers.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 11, 2025

On January 30, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) approved a Stipulation and Consent Agreement (Agreement) between the Office of Enforcement (OE) and Stronghold Digital Mining Inc. (Stronghold) resolving an investigation into whether Stronghold had violated the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) tariff and Commission regulations by limiting the quantity of energy made available to the market to serve a co-located Bitcoin mining operation.1 This order appears to be the first instance of a public enforcement action involving co-located load and generation and comes at a time when both FERC and market operators2 are scrutinizing the treatment of co-located load due to the rapid increase in demand associated with data center development.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 5, 2025

2024 was about post-consolidation deal flow and a steady uptick in activity across the oil & gas market. This year, mergers & acquisitions (M&A) activity looks set to take on a different tone as major consolidation plays bed down.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 30, 2025

The oil & gas industry is experiencing a capital resurgence, driven by stabilizing interest rates and renewed attention from institutional investors. Private equity is leading the charge with private credit filling the void in traditional energy finance and hybrid capital instruments gaining in popularity. Family offices are also playing a crucial role, providing long-term, flexible investments.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 23, 2025

Under a second Trump presidency, the U.S. is expected to consider reversal of many of the Biden administration’s climate and environmental policies, in addition to a markedly different approach to trade policy and oil & gas regulation. This includes expanding oil & gas development on public lands and offshore, lifting the pause on liquified natural gas (LNG) exports to non-Free Trade Agreement countries and repealing the methane fee.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 15, 2025

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Drilling Down: What Oil & Gas Companies Can Expect from Federal Agencies During Trump’s Second Administration.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 9, 2025

On January 6, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a Final Rule to amend its regulations governing the maximum civil monetary penalties assessable for violations of statutes, rules and orders within FERC’s jurisdiction. The Final Rule is a result of the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, which requires each federal agency to issue an annual inflation adjustment by January 15 for each civil monetary penalty provided by law within the agency’s jurisdiction. The adjustments in the Final Rule represent an increase of approximately 2.6% for each covered maximum penalty. FERC’s adjusted maximum penalty amounts, which will apply at the time of assessment of a civil penalty regardless of the date on which the violation occurred, are set forth here and will become effective upon publication in the Federal Register.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 9, 2025

Join projects & energy transition partners Ike Emehelu and Shariff Barakat as well as climate change partner Ken Markowitz at Infocast's Projects & Money, where Ike will moderate the "The State of Project Finance – View from the C-Suite" panel, and Shariff will moderate the "Capital Markets & Other Capital Sources for Project Finance & Investment" panel. Ken will moderate the “Carbon Markets Forecast for 2025” panel.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.