D.C. Public Service Commission Approves Phased-In Doubling of Net Energy Metering Generation Cap

Aug 10, 2020

Reading Time : 3 min

Net metering, as described in the Order, “allows an owner of rooftop solar panels [or other eligible renewable energy system] to participate in the electric grid as a distributed energy producer. Solar panels first supply power to the home [or business], and at times when the [system] produces more power than the home [or business] is using the power is sent back onto the grid to be used by other customers. The meter ‘spins’ backwards, subtracting the power sent onto the grid from the total power used by the consumer. . . . [A]t the end of the month the consumer is charged only for net electricity used.”5 Previously, an eligible customer-generator in D.C. was allowed to “‘install generation that is forecast to provide no more than 100 percent of its annual historic use,’ which limits the amount a customer may receive or be credited for the excess generation exported to the grid.”6 Here, in connection with its PowerPath initiative, the PSC determined that “the generating threshold for net energy metering systems for individual behind-the-meter generators should be increased beyond 100 percent of the customer’s historical usage” to support and advance D.C.’s renewable energy goals.7 Phasing in the change over five years seeks to strike a balance between quickly modernizing the energy system in D.C. and protecting against adverse reliability, safety and cost impacts on the electric distribution system.8

Under the new scheme, “excess generation not used in a previous month will remain on the customer’s account as a rolling kWh credit amount. Any monthly excess generation, used to offset [that] month’s usage, will be calculated and credited to the customer at the full retail rate[, which includes the combined rate for generation, supply, and distribution]. Any total remaining excess kWh at the end of the [calendar year], will be compensated at the generation rate only.”9 Remainders over $25 will be refunded to the customer.10 To guard against adverse impacts that might arise from additional interconnections of larger behind-the-meter generation systems, the PSC also directed its “NEM Working Group to meet after July 1, 2021, to review and discuss the impacts of the 2020 and 2021 threshold increases in generation of customer-generators on the electric distribution system.”11 In addition, on or before October 1, 2021, and each October 1 thereafter, if Pepco “identifies a reliability, safety, or cost impact on the electric distribution system caused by the implementation of the [new] Generation Threshold Schedule,” it can request suspension of the increase in the following year.12 Absent such a request, the increase will take place automatically on January 1 each year.13


1 RM9-2020-03, In the Matter of 15 DCMR Chapter 9 – Net Energy Metering, Order No. 20387 (Aug. 6, 2020) (“Order”).

2 See 15 DCMR § 999 (defining “customer-generator” as “a residential or commercial customer that owns (or leases or contracts) and operates an electric generating facility that: (a) has a capacity of not more than 1000 kilowatts; (b) uses renewable resources, cogeneration, fuel cells, or microturbines; (c) is located on the customer’s premises; (d) is interconnected with the Electric Company’s transmission and distribution facilities; and (e) is intended primarily to offset all or part of the customer’s own electricity requirements.”).

3 Order at P 1.

4 See id. n.1.

5 Id. n.5.

6 Id. P 2 (footnote omitted).

7 Id. PP 2, 13.

8 See id. P 10.

9 Id. P 5.

10 Id.

11 Id. P 11.

12 See id. P 4. See also 15 DCMR § 901.2(b) (as amended).

13 See 15 DCMR § 901.2(b) (as amended).

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

August 07, 2024

*Thank you to JaKell Larson, 2024 Akin Summer Associate, for her valuable collaboration on this article.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 31, 2024

Interstate oil, liquid and refined products pipelines regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) will soon be able to raise their transportation rates (provided they were set using FERC’s popular Index rate methodology) in the wake of a significant new decision by the District of Columbia Circuit (the D.C. Circuit) in Liquid Energy Pipeline Association v. FERC (LEPA).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 29, 2024

On Wednesday, July 24, 2024, the U.S. House of Representative Committee on Energy and Commerce held a Subcommittee on Energy, Climate, and Grid Security hearing to review the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request. Members of the Subcommittee had the opportunity to hear testimony from all five Commissioners, including FERC Chairman Willie Phillips and Commissioner Mark Christie, as well as the three recently confirmed commissioners, David Rosner, Lindsay See and Judy Chang. In addition to their prepared remarks, the five commissioners answered questions on FERC’s mandate to provide affordable and reliable electricity and natural gas services nationwide, while also ensuring it fulfills its primary mission of maintaining just and reasonable rates.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 29, 2024

On July 9, 2024, the U.S. Court of the Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) erred in ordering refunds for certain bilateral spot market transactions in the Western Energy Coordinating Council (WECC) region that exceeded the $1,000/megawatt-hour (MWh) “soft” price cap for such sales.1 Finding FERC failed to conduct a “Mobile-Sierra public-interest analysis” before “altering” those contracts by ordering refunds, the court vacated FERC’s orders and remanded the case to FERC for further proceedings.2

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 8, 2024

On June 28, 2024, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., which for 40 years required court deference to reasonable agency interpretations of federal statutes in certain circumstances, even when the reviewing court would read the statute differently. The Court ended “Chevron deference” and held that courts “must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority.” In doing so, the Court upended a longstanding principle of administrative law that is likely to make agency decisions more susceptible to challenge in the courts.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 3, 2024

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin and ICF’s recently presented “Powering Progress: Decoding FERC Order No. 1920” webinar, along with the program materials.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 12, 2024

Join projects & energy transition partner Ben Reiter at Infocast's Transmission & Interconnection Summit, where he will moderate the “Dealing with the Impacts of Increased Interconnection Request Requirements and Costs” panel.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 4, 2024

Join projects & energy transition partners Hayden Harms and Vanessa Wilson at Infocast's RNG & SAF Capital Markets Summit, where Hayden will moderate the "Investor Perspectives: Private Equity, Infrastructure Funds, & Strategies" panel, and Vanessa will moderate the "Opportunities in Other Biogas/Fuels Markets" panel.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.