EPA Announces Intent to Approve Class VI Primacy for Louisiana

May 2, 2023

Reading Time : 3 min

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its intent to approve the State of Louisiana’s request to take primary responsibility for the permitting of geologic carbon sequestration facilities as Class VI injection wells under the Safe Drinking Water Act’s (SDWA) Underground Injection Control (UIC) program. UIC Class VI wells are used to inject and permanently store carbon dioxide in underground geologic formations. The approval will accelerate development of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) projects in Louisiana.

Sponsors seeking to develop carbon capture and sequestration projects must seek approval for Class VI wells from the EPA, unless EPA grants primacy to the host state. EPA review of Class VI well applications is a multi-year time consuming process and is a key source of delay for CCS projects. Upon approval of Louisiana’s request for primacy, it would join North Dakota and Wyoming as the only states with authority to issue Class VI permits to CCS projects within their borders. 

In light of recent enhancements by the Inflation Reduction Act to the Section 45Q tax credit for CCS, along with a number of CCS funded programs under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, new Class VI wells will need to be permitted at an increasing rate to support the build out of this technology, which is viewed as a tool to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions that may contribute to climate change.

Background

The EPA added Class VI wells to the SDWA UIC program in 2010. Since then, EPA has issued just six Class VI permits. Of these, only two such permits led to actual Class VI well construction,1 with each of those permits taking approximately six years to issue.2 In 2022, EPA announced steps to speed up its Class VI permitting timeframe to two years.3 EPA has also received additional funding from Congress to support Class VI well permitting. By granting the Louisiana primacy request, the EPA will be able to further streamline the Class VI well permitting process for Louisiana-based CCS projects.

Before EPA may grant a state primacy over the Class VI well permitting process, the state must demonstrate that it will adopt a Class VI well permitting program at least as stringent as the EPA’s that is protective of underground sources of drinking water, and has the administrative, civil, and criminal enforcement penalties necessary to carry out the purpose of the SDWA.4 EPA conducts both a technical and legal review of a state’s primacy request to ensure it meets these requirements and will enter into a memorandum of agreement with the state regarding the administration, implementation and enforcement of the Class VI program.

Louisiana’s Class VI Primacy Request

Louisiana first submitted its request for primacy to EPA on September 17, 2021.5 Louisiana then submitted a revised application on April 23, 2023 after working with EPA to incorporate mitigation measures into its program that would consider the impacts of carbon capture and removal technologies on impacted environmental justice communities.6 Specifically, Louisiana committed to examining the potential risks of each proposed Class VI well to minority and low income populations.7 At one point, Louisiana’s request became a political flashpoint after one of the state’s U.S. Senators proposed to hold up the Biden administration’s nominees for the EPA until the state’s Class VI status was approved.8

Next Steps

Comments are due on EPA’s proposal to grant Louisiana Class VI primacy within 60 days of the date the proposed rule is published in the federal register. Additionally, EPA will hold a public hearing on Louisiana’s request on June 15, 2023 in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.


1 EPA, Class VI Permitting Report to Congress at 15 (Oct. 28, 2022).

2Van Voorhees, Bob, et al., Observations on Class VI Permitting: Lessons Learned and Guidance Available at 3 (2021), available at: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/117640.

3 EPA, Class VI Permitting Report to Congress at 13 (Oct. 28, 2022).

4 40 C.F.R. § 145.23.

5EPA, State of Louisiana Underground Injection Control Program; Class VI Program Revision Application, Docket No. EPA-HQ-OW-2023-0073 (April 27, 2023).

6 Id.

7 Id.

8 Cassidy Places Holds on EPA Nominees over Delays in Permitting of Louisiana Carbon Capture (Feb. 16, 2022), available at: https://www.cassidy.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cassidy-places-holds-on-epa-nominees-over-delays-in-permitting-of-louisiana-carbon-capture.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

January 9, 2025

On January 6, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a Final Rule to amend its regulations governing the maximum civil monetary penalties assessable for violations of statutes, rules and orders within FERC’s jurisdiction. The Final Rule is a result of the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, which requires each federal agency to issue an annual inflation adjustment by January 15 for each civil monetary penalty provided by law within the agency’s jurisdiction. The adjustments in the Final Rule represent an increase of approximately 2.6% for each covered maximum penalty. FERC’s adjusted maximum penalty amounts, which will apply at the time of assessment of a civil penalty regardless of the date on which the violation occurred, are set forth here and will become effective upon publication in the Federal Register.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 9, 2025

Join projects & energy transition partners Ike Emehelu and Shariff Barakat at Infocast's Projects & Money, where Ike will moderate the "The State of Project Finance – View from the C-Suite" panel, and Shariff will moderate the "Capital Markets & Other Capital Sources for Project Finance & Investment" panel. 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 8, 2025

On December 16, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an Order to Show Cause and Notice of Proposed Penalty proposing to assess staggering civil penalties against American Efficient, LLC and its affiliates (collectively, American Efficient) in connection with an alleged scheme to manipulate the capacity markets operated by PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) and the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO).1 The Order directs American Efficient to show cause as to why it should not be required to pay a civil penalty of $722 million and disgorge $253 million.2

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 5, 2024

On November 27, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued Venture Global CP2 LNG, LLC, an order that sets aside, in part, the Commission’s prior authorization of the CP2 LNG Terminal and CP Express Pipeline Project (collectively, the CP2 Project) under sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA). 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 5, 2024

On November 27, 2024, in Venture Global, CP2 LNG, LLC,1 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC or Commission) explicitly overruled precedent set in Northern Natural Gas Co.,2 a 2021 decision in which FERC made an affirmative finding that an interstate natural gas pipeline project it was certificating under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) would not make a “significant” contribution to global climate change. Northern Natural is the only FERC decision in which a so-called significance determination was made with respect to greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) arising from a FERC-regulated natural gas infrastructure project. In Venture Global, FERC rejected arguments that it needed to follow Northern Natural and assess the significance of GHG emissions in all NGA certificate proceedings to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA requires federal agencies, including FERC, that perform “major federal actions,” which include issuing NGA section 7 certificates, to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) if the action will “significantly affect[] the quality of the human environment.”3 FERC has been under pressure to fully explain why it has chosen not to apply Northern Natural’s significance analysis in subsequent cases, and that issue is currently before FERC on remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) in Healthy Gulf et al. v. FERC, which reviewed FERC’s approval of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal under NGA section 3.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 4, 2024

On November 21, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued Order No. 1920-A1 addressing requests for rehearing and clarification of FERC’s landmark final rule on transmission planning and cost allocation issued in May 2024. While the Commission largely affirmed the final rule, the order grants rehearing of some of the more controversial aspects of Order No. 1920.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 26, 2024

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Post-Election Outlook for the Energy Sector.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

August 7, 2024

*Thank you to JaKell Larson, 2024 Akin Summer Associate, for her valuable collaboration on this article.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.