FERC Directs NERC to Tighten Bulk Electric System Cybersecurity

January 26, 2023

Reading Time : 5 min

By: Stephen J. Hug, Emily P. Mallen, Scott Daniel Johnson, Angelica Gonzalez (Paralegal)

These Reliability Standards will apply to all high impact BES Cyber Systems with and without external routable connectivity—i.e., a high-speed internet connection6—and medium impact BES Cyber Systems with external routable connectivity.7 FERC also directed NERC “to study the feasibility of implementing INSM at bulk electric cyber systems that would not be addressed by the new or modified standard[s],”8 which include low impact BES Cyber Systems with and without external routable connectivity and medium impact BES Cyber Systems without external routable connectivity.9

The Final Rule will become effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.10 NERC has 15 months to submit the new standards and 12 months to submit its study on low- and medium-impact systems.11

New Acting Chairman Willie L. Phillips commented that “[t]he nature of cyber security threats to our nation’s grid require constant monitoring and vigilance,” and FERC’s action represents “a major step to better secure the reliability of our nation’s bulk power system.”12 In a prior role, Chairman Phillips served as an Assistant General Counsel with NERC.

Overview

Under the current NERC CIP Reliability Standards, network security monitoring requirements focus on defending the electronic security perimeter—such as through access point controls and monitoring for malicious communications—rather than on potential vulnerabilities of the internal network.13 Adding INSM requirements is “designed to address as early as possible situations where perimeter network defenses are breached by detecting intrusions and malicious activity within a trust zone.”14It consists of: (1) collection; (2) detection; and (3) analysis.15 These three stages together “provide the benefit of early detection and alerting of intrusions and malicious activity.”16 Early detection and response can, in turn, “reduce[] the likelihood that an attacker can gain a strong foothold, including operational control, on the target system.”17 INSM can also enable “collection of data and analysis required to implement a defense strategy, improves an entity’s incident investigation capabilities, and increases the likelihood that an entity can better protect itself from a future cyberattack and address any security gaps the attacker was able to exploit.”18

While “NERC has flexibility in developing the content of INSM requirements, the new or modified CIP Reliability Standards must address [certain] specific concerns” FERC raised.19They must be “forward-looking, objective-based, and . . . address . . . three security objectives that pertain to INSM.”20 First, they “should address the need for responsible entities to develop baselines of their network traffic inside their CIP-networked environment.”21 Second, they “should address the need for responsible entities to monitor for and detect unauthorized activity, connections, devices, and software inside the CIP-networked environment.”22 Finally, they “should require responsible entities to identify anomalous activity to a high level of confidence by: (1) logging network traffic” (such as by packet capture); “(2) maintaining logs and other data collected regarding network traffic; and (3) implementing measures to minimize the likelihood of an attacker removing evidence of their tactics, techniques, and procedures from compromised devices.”23

As to other BES Cyber Systems not covered by the new or revised Reliability Standards, FERC found that it is “premature” to require INSM for such systems, but also recognized “the importance of bolstering the cybersecurity of those systems,” noting that “extending INSM to [such] BES Cyber Systems . . . in the future could be necessary to protect the security and the reliability of the Bulk-Power System.”24

NERC Study Regarding Lower-Impact Systems

In NERC’s study of such BES Cyber Systems, FERC directed that NERC “should include . . . a determination of: (1) ongoing risk to the reliability and security of the Bulk-Power System posed by low and medium impact BES Cyber Systems that would not be subject to the new or modified Reliability Standards, including the number of low and medium impact BES Cyber Systems not required to comply with the new or modified standard; and (2) potential technological or other challenges involved in extending INSM to additional BES Cyber Systems, as well as possible alternative mitigating actions to address ongoing risks.”25 FERC may use this information to provide a basis “for further Commission action, as warranted, regarding INSM or alternatives.”26 NERC’s study is due within a year of the effective date of the Final Rule.27

Recommendations

Entities that own or operate high impact BES Cyber Systems with and without external routable connectivity and medium impact BES Cyber Systems with external routable connectivity should, at a minimum, continue to monitor NERC’s Reliability Standards development process and consider participating in that process and/or the FERC proceeding in which NERC submits its proposed standards. Those entities with medium impact BES Cyber Systems without external routable connectivity or low impact BES Cyber Systems should review NERC’s study report for indications about what more, if anything, NERC or FERC might do going forward with respect to such systems. This remains a rapidly evolving area with the potential to create additional cybersecurity risk, compliance costs and liability for affected entities. Stay ahead by staying informed.


1Internal Network Sec. Monitoring for High & Medium Impact Bulk Elec. Sys. Cyber Sys., Order No. 887, 182 FERC ¶ 61,021 (2023) (“Final Rule”). See also FERC, News Release, FERC Strengthens Reliability Standards for Monitoring Electric Grid Cyber Systems (Jan. 19, 2023) (“FERC News Release”) (available here).

2Final Rule at P 20. See also id. at PP 39, 50.

3Id. at P 3. See also id. at PP 19, 80.

4 Id. at PP 15, 50.

5 Id. at P 15. See also id. at PP 3, 50.

6 “External routable connectivity” is the “ability to access a BES Cyber System from a Cyber Asset that is outside of its associated Electronic Security Perimeter via a bi-directional routable protocol connection.” Id. n.3 (quoting NERC, Glossary of Terms Used in NERC Reliability Standards (2022) (NERC Glossary), https://www.nerc.com/pa/Stand/Glossary%20of%20Terms/Glossary_of_Terms.pdf).

7 Id. at P 1. NERC’s CIP Reliability Standards categorize BES Cyber Systems “as high, medium, or low impact depending on the functions of the assets housed within each system and the risk they potentially pose to the reliable operation of the Bulk-Power System.” Id. n.2. The designated impact level then “determines the applicability of security controls for BES Cyber Systems that are contained in the remaining CIP Reliability Standards (i.e., Reliability Standards CIP-003-8 to CIP-013-1)” as they currently exist. Id. In early 2022, FERC had proposed to direct NERC to address INSM for all high and medium impact BES Cyber Systems, but limited the requirement in the Final Rule in response to stakeholder comments. Id. at P 4 (citing Internal Network Sec. Monitoring for High & Medium Impact Bulk Elec. Sys. Cyber Sys., Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 178 FERC ¶ 61,038 (2022)).

8 E.g., FERC News Release at 1.

9 Final Rule at PP 1, 88.

10Id. at P 104.

11 E.g., id., at PP 1, 6.

12 FERC News Release at 1.

13 See, e.g., Final Rule at PP 3, 14.

14 Id. at P 9.

15 Id.

16 Id.

17 Id. at P 13.

18 Id. at P 49.

19 Id. at P 5.

20 Id.

21 Id.

22Id.

23Id. (footnotes omitted). See also id. at P 77.

24 Id. at P 88.

25 Id. at P 7. See also id. at P 88.

26 Id. at P 7. See also id. at PP 31, 88.

27 E.g., id. at P 91.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2025

On March 5, 2025, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) approved Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC’s (GPLNG) request to extend a deadline to begin exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminal facility currently under construction in Sabine Pass, Texas for 18 months, from September 30, 2025, to March 31, 2027 (the Order). The Order amends GPLNG’s two existing long-term orders authorizing the export of domestically produced LNG to countries with which the United States does and does not have free trade agreements (FTA).1  The Order does not amend the authorizations’ end date, which remains December 31, 2050. Under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), the DOE may authorize exports to non-FTA countries following completion of a “public interest” review, whereas exports to FTA countries are deemed to be in the public interest and the DOE is directed to issue authorizations without modification or delay.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 4, 2025

Join projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat at Infocast’s Solar & Wind, where he will moderate the “Tax Equity Market Dynamics” panel.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 13, 2025

Oil & gas companies continue to identify and capitalize on opportunities related to the deployment of new energy technologies, with their approaches broadly maturing and coalescing around maximizing synergies, leveraging available subsidies and responding to regulatory drivers.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 11, 2025

On January 30, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) approved a Stipulation and Consent Agreement (Agreement) between the Office of Enforcement (OE) and Stronghold Digital Mining Inc. (Stronghold) resolving an investigation into whether Stronghold had violated the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) tariff and Commission regulations by limiting the quantity of energy made available to the market to serve a co-located Bitcoin mining operation.1 This order appears to be the first instance of a public enforcement action involving co-located load and generation and comes at a time when both FERC and market operators2 are scrutinizing the treatment of co-located load due to the rapid increase in demand associated with data center development.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 5, 2025

2024 was about post-consolidation deal flow and a steady uptick in activity across the oil & gas market. This year, mergers & acquisitions (M&A) activity looks set to take on a different tone as major consolidation plays bed down.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 30, 2025

The oil & gas industry is experiencing a capital resurgence, driven by stabilizing interest rates and renewed attention from institutional investors. Private equity is leading the charge with private credit filling the void in traditional energy finance and hybrid capital instruments gaining in popularity. Family offices are also playing a crucial role, providing long-term, flexible investments.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 23, 2025

Under a second Trump presidency, the U.S. is expected to consider reversal of many of the Biden administration’s climate and environmental policies, in addition to a markedly different approach to trade policy and oil & gas regulation. This includes expanding oil & gas development on public lands and offshore, lifting the pause on liquified natural gas (LNG) exports to non-Free Trade Agreement countries and repealing the methane fee.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 15, 2025

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Drilling Down: What Oil & Gas Companies Can Expect from Federal Agencies During Trump’s Second Administration.”

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.