FERC NOPR Seeks Access to Additional Electric Reliability Data

Sep 25, 2015

Reading Time : 3 min

NERC is the Commission-certified Electric Reliability Organization under Section 215 of the Federal Power Act,1 which was enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (“EPAct 2005”). Pursuant to that statute, NERC is charged with developing mandatory and enforceable reliability standards, subject to FERC review and approval. Section 215(d)(5) also gives FERC authority to direct NERC to develop a new or modified reliability standard to address a specific matter.2 In addition, Section 215(g) requires NERC to “conduct periodic assessments of the reliability and adequacy of the bulk-power system in North America.” 

In the NOPR, the Commission is proposing to amend its regulations to require NERC to make available to FERC and FERC staff, “on a nonpublic and ongoing basis,” the reliability information it collects from transmission and generation owners and places in three specific databases:

  • Transmission Availability Data System (TADS) – includes transmission outage data for bulk electric system AC and DC circuits, transmission-level transformers and bulk electric system AC/DC convertors
  • Generating Availability Data System (GADS) – contains generation outage data for most types of generating units with a capacity of 20 megawatts or larger, including event records documenting when, and to what extent, a generating unit could not produce power, and performance records summarizing monthly generation, attempted starts actual starts, and fuels
  • Protection System Misoperations Database – contains information on protection system misoperation events, including the equipment involved and the cause of the misoperation.

FERC asserts that access to the information in these databases is necessary to carry out the agency’s obligations under Section 215 of the Federal Power Act.  In particular, FERC argues that access to the databases is needed to “inform the Commission more quickly, directly and comprehensively about reliability trends or reliability gaps” that might require it to exercise its authority under Section 215(d)(5) to direct NERC to develop a new or modified reliability standard.  In addition, FERC contends that access to the information in the databases will help it better understand the periodic reliability assessments conducted by NERC pursuant to Section 215(g).

FERC’s proposal is likely to be met with concerns from NERC and industry that it signals an intent on the part of the Commission to more aggressively use its authority under Section 215(d)(5) to direct NERC to develop new or modified reliability standards.  Commissioner LaFleur acknowledged this potential concern in a concurring statement, noting that the statutory relationship between NERC and FERC is unique, vesting NERC with primary responsibility for developing reliability standards while giving FERC an oversight role.  While FERC has used its section 215(d)(5) authority in the past, industry has raised concerns that more frequent and aggressive use of that authority could upset the careful balance of roles between FERC and NERC that Congress envisioned.

In addition, while FERC does not suggest in the NOPR that it will use its access to the information in these three databases to support actions to enforce compliance with the mandatory reliability standards, there may also be concerns that the Commission will, in fact, do so. 

Finally, the proposal could raise confidentiality concerns for transmission and generation owners.  In particular, there could be concerns that information retrieved from these databases by FERC or FERC staff will be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or other authorities, or that such information could be inadvertently disclosed.  The Commission acknowledges these concerns in the NOPR and states that it will “take appropriate steps,” under FOIA and its own regulations, when handling such information.

Comments on the NOPR are due 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.    



1 16 U.S.C. § 824o.

2 FERC does not have authority to write reliability standards itself, however.  

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

April 15, 2025

On April 9, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order (EO)1 directing several federal agencies and subagencies that regulate energy, environmental, and conservation matters,2 including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Department of Energy (DOE), to establish conditional sunset dates for “regulations governing energy production.” The stated objective of the EO is to require agencies to periodically reexamine their regulations to ensure that they continue to serve the public good. For FERC, the order covers regulations promulgated under the Federal Power Act (FPA), the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act (FUA)3, as amended, while DOE must consider regulations promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act, the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct 1992), the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), as amended (collectively the Covered Regulations).4 To the extent the DOE has been directed to promulgate regulations under various sections of the NGA, FPA and FUA, and FERC has been directed to promulgate regulations specific to the statutes attributed to the DOE in the EO, the EO is silent. The EO expressly does not apply to those “regulatory permitting regimes authorized by statute.”5

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

April 10, 2025

On April 8, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) directing the Department of Energy (DOE) to take steps to expand the use of its emergency authority under Federal Power Act (FPA) Section 202(c) to require the retention of generation resources deemed necessary to maintain resource adequacy within at risk-regions of the bulk power system regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).1 The EO appears to envision a more active role for DOE in overseeing and supporting the resource adequacy of the grid that deviates from the historic use of Section 202(c) and touches on issues at the intersection of state and federal authority over resource planning.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2025

On March 5, 2025, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) approved Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC’s (GPLNG) request to extend a deadline to begin exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminal facility currently under construction in Sabine Pass, Texas for 18 months, from September 30, 2025, to March 31, 2027 (the Order). The Order amends GPLNG’s two existing long-term orders authorizing the export of domestically produced LNG to countries with which the United States does and does not have free trade agreements (FTA).1  The Order does not amend the authorizations’ end date, which remains December 31, 2050. Under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), the DOE may authorize exports to non-FTA countries following completion of a “public interest” review, whereas exports to FTA countries are deemed to be in the public interest and the DOE is directed to issue authorizations without modification or delay.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 4, 2025

Join projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat at Infocast’s Solar & Wind, where he will moderate the “Tax Equity Market Dynamics” panel.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 13, 2025

Oil & gas companies continue to identify and capitalize on opportunities related to the deployment of new energy technologies, with their approaches broadly maturing and coalescing around maximizing synergies, leveraging available subsidies and responding to regulatory drivers.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 11, 2025

On January 30, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) approved a Stipulation and Consent Agreement (Agreement) between the Office of Enforcement (OE) and Stronghold Digital Mining Inc. (Stronghold) resolving an investigation into whether Stronghold had violated the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) tariff and Commission regulations by limiting the quantity of energy made available to the market to serve a co-located Bitcoin mining operation.1 This order appears to be the first instance of a public enforcement action involving co-located load and generation and comes at a time when both FERC and market operators2 are scrutinizing the treatment of co-located load due to the rapid increase in demand associated with data center development.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 5, 2025

2024 was about post-consolidation deal flow and a steady uptick in activity across the oil & gas market. This year, mergers & acquisitions (M&A) activity looks set to take on a different tone as major consolidation plays bed down.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 30, 2025

The oil & gas industry is experiencing a capital resurgence, driven by stabilizing interest rates and renewed attention from institutional investors. Private equity is leading the charge with private credit filling the void in traditional energy finance and hybrid capital instruments gaining in popularity. Family offices are also playing a crucial role, providing long-term, flexible investments.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.