Indonesia’s New CCS/CCUS Regulations: Promoting Energy Transition in Southeast Asia

April 13, 2023

Reading Time : 4 min

In March 2023, Indonesia’s Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources, Arifin Tasrif, announced the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 2 of 2023 concerning Implementation of Carbon Capture and Storage, as well as Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage in Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities (the “MEMR 2/2023”). Indonesia, which has geological formations well suited to the development of carbon capture and storage (“CCS”) as well as carbon capture, utilization and storage (“CCUS”) projects, has become one of the first countries in Southeast Asia to promulgate regulations to support the integration of CCS/CCUS projects within upstream exploration and production activities with the goal of helping to decarbonize the industry.

MEMR 2/2023

According to the International Energy Agency, “successfully deploying CCUS relies on the establishment of legal and regulatory frameworks to ensure the effective stewardship of CCUS activities and the safe and secure storage of CO21. MEMR 2/2023 (which consists of 11 chapters and 61 articles) has been drafted with the goal of encouraging the development of commercial scale CCS/CCUS projects in Indonesia. Some of the key items addressed in MEMR 2/2023 include:

  • before commencement of a CCS/CCUS project, a proposal or a plan which addresses the feasibility of the proposed CCS/CCUS project in terms of its compliance with applicable standards and good practice principles needs to be submitted by the contractor of the relevant upstream working area to a government unit called the Special Work Unit for Upstream Oil and Gas Activities (Satuan Kerja Khusus Pelaksana Kegiatan Usaha Hulu Minyak dan Gas Bumi or “SKK Migas”) or (in the context of projects related to concessions in Aceh province) the Aceh Oil and Gas Management Agency (Badan Pengelola Migas Aceh or the “BPMA”);
  • once the above proposal or plan is approved by the relevant regulator, the contractor may carry out the CCS/CCUS activities, provided that (i) a series of ongoing monitoring activities is also untaken in parallel to ensure compliance with health, safety, environmental and social aspects of the CCS/CCUS project, (ii) such monitoring obligation continues for a period of up to 10 years after the closure of CCS/CCUS activities and (iii) a reserve account (which shall be a joint account established and maintained on behalf of the contractor and SKK Migas/BPMA) is funded during the 10-year period to ensure the monitoring activities can be undertaken even after decommissioning;
  • in order to proceed with closure of CCS/CCUS activities and transfer a contractor’s rights, obligations and responsibilities for the CCS/CCUS project back to the state, the contractor needs to verify with the Directorate General of Oil and Gas or a third-party verification body that, among others, there is no leakage, ground water contamination or other risks from any of the project facilities and adequate measures have been taken to prevent any future leakage; and
  • carbon trading and reimbursement of operational costs for the use of joint facilities can be ways to monetize a CCS/CCUS project, and the CCS/CCUS project may also benefit from tax incentives applicable to the upstream oil and gas business activities (e.g., exemption from import taxes).

Although the regulation does provide some much needed clarity around the scope and requirements of CCS/CCUS activities, there are a number of issues that remain to be addressed, including leakage risk, allocation of title and risk in the context of commingled carbon and ensuring quality specifications. It is also unclear to what extent Indonesia will look to offer financial incentives to attract investment across the CCS/CCUS value chain, and it will be interesting to see whether the Indonesian government will follow jurisdictions such as the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe by introducing tax breaks and credits for CCUS technologies.

Catalyst for the Neighboring Countries?

CCS/CCUS technologies are set to play an important role in supporting the clean energy transition across Southeast Asia. Indonesia’s neighboring countries Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand and the Philippines all have potential for geological storage of CO2andare working to draft their own regulations and so are likely closely monitoring the developments in Indonesia and the impact MEME 2/2023 has on the development of domestic CCS/CCUS projects.

It would be especially interesting to see whether Malaysia will quickly follow Indonesia’s footsteps and announce its own regulations, given Malaysia through its well-established oil and gas industry was positioning itself to be a CCS/CCUS leading destination in Southeast Asia. Malaysia was already moving ahead with projects such as the Kasawari offshore CCS project and the Lang Lebah offshore CCS project, and Malaysia’s PETRONAS has signed a Memorandum of Understanding in August 2022 with six South Korean companies (Samsung Engineering Co., Ltd., Samsung Heavy Industries, SK Earthon Co., Ltd., SK Energy Co., Ltd., GS Energy Corporation and Lotte Chemical Co.) to undertake conceptual and feasibility studies towards establishing a full value chain related to CCUS, but currently there is no CCS/CCUS-specific law in Malaysia.

Also, we may wait and see whether Indonesia’s MEMR 2/2023 could serve as a stepping stone towards discussion around regional cooperation. Although domestic regulations such as MEMR 2/2023 will be important to the development of domestic CCS/CCUS projects, regional cooperation will be absolutely critical to unlock the region’s vast carbon-capture potential. A series of issues will inevitably arise in a cross-border context, so without regional cooperation to foster confidence and certainty around a cross-border/transboundary legal and regulatory regime, the idea of transporting CO2from Singapore to Indonesia through pipeline or shipping CO2from countries such as Japan and South Korea to Malaysia may merely remain a lofty ambition.


1https://www.iea.org/reports/legal-and-regulatory-frameworks-for-ccus

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

January 8, 2025

On December 16, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an Order to Show Cause and Notice of Proposed Penalty proposing to assess staggering civil penalties against American Efficient, LLC and its affiliates (collectively, American Efficient) in connection with an alleged scheme to manipulate the capacity markets operated by PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) and the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO).1 The Order directs American Efficient to show cause as to why it should not be required to pay a civil penalty of $722 million and disgorge $253 million.2

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 5, 2024

On November 27, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued Venture Global CP2 LNG, LLC, an order that sets aside, in part, the Commission’s prior authorization of the CP2 LNG Terminal and CP Express Pipeline Project (collectively, the CP2 Project) under sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA). 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 5, 2024

On November 27, 2024, in Venture Global, CP2 LNG, LLC,1 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC or Commission) explicitly overruled precedent set in Northern Natural Gas Co.,2 a 2021 decision in which FERC made an affirmative finding that an interstate natural gas pipeline project it was certificating under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) would not make a “significant” contribution to global climate change. Northern Natural is the only FERC decision in which a so-called significance determination was made with respect to greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) arising from a FERC-regulated natural gas infrastructure project. In Venture Global, FERC rejected arguments that it needed to follow Northern Natural and assess the significance of GHG emissions in all NGA certificate proceedings to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA requires federal agencies, including FERC, that perform “major federal actions,” which include issuing NGA section 7 certificates, to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) if the action will “significantly affect[] the quality of the human environment.”3 FERC has been under pressure to fully explain why it has chosen not to apply Northern Natural’s significance analysis in subsequent cases, and that issue is currently before FERC on remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) in Healthy Gulf et al. v. FERC, which reviewed FERC’s approval of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal under NGA section 3.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 4, 2024

On November 21, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued Order No. 1920-A1 addressing requests for rehearing and clarification of FERC’s landmark final rule on transmission planning and cost allocation issued in May 2024. While the Commission largely affirmed the final rule, the order grants rehearing of some of the more controversial aspects of Order No. 1920.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 26, 2024

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Post-Election Outlook for the Energy Sector.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

August 7, 2024

*Thank you to JaKell Larson, 2024 Akin Summer Associate, for her valuable collaboration on this article.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 31, 2024

Interstate oil, liquid and refined products pipelines regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) will soon be able to raise their transportation rates (provided they were set using FERC’s popular Index rate methodology) in the wake of a significant new decision by the District of Columbia Circuit (the D.C. Circuit) in Liquid Energy Pipeline Association v. FERC (LEPA).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 29, 2024

On Wednesday, July 24, 2024, the U.S. House of Representative Committee on Energy and Commerce held a Subcommittee on Energy, Climate, and Grid Security hearing to review the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request. Members of the Subcommittee had the opportunity to hear testimony from all five Commissioners, including FERC Chairman Willie Phillips and Commissioner Mark Christie, as well as the three recently confirmed commissioners, David Rosner, Lindsay See and Judy Chang. In addition to their prepared remarks, the five commissioners answered questions on FERC’s mandate to provide affordable and reliable electricity and natural gas services nationwide, while also ensuring it fulfills its primary mission of maintaining just and reasonable rates.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.