PJM Board Moves Forward with MOPR Overhaul

Jul 9, 2021

Reading Time : 2 min

The MOPR imposes an offer floor (i.e., a minimum bid price) on certain electric generation resources in PJM’s capacity auctions. While historically the rule has applied in only limited circumstances, FERC directed major reforms to the MOPR in 2019 that expanded its reach: The bid price of any generator receiving a “state subsidy” is mitigated to the MOPR’s offer floor under the current rule. The expanded rule has become a major point of tension between FERC and the states, which view the rule as impeding their ability to promote emissions-free electric generation such as wind, solar and nuclear power.

If approved by FERC, the forthcoming reforms would significantly scale back the MOPR and would provide states with more latitude to shape their resource mixes without federal intervention. All market sellers would be required to provide two attestations to PJM prior to an auction to avoid mitigation: (1) an attestation confirming that the seller is not exercising buyer-side market power (BSMP) and (2) an attestation confirming that the seller is not receiving “Conditioned State Support.” The first attestation means that the seller is not offering its resource(s) uneconomically with the intent of suppressing market clearing prices. The second means that the seller is not receiving financial support from a state for the sale of a FERC-jurisdictional product, where such support is conditioned on clearing in a capacity auction. 

If PJM has reason to believe, despite an attestation to the contrary, that a seller is receiving “Conditioned State Support,” PJM will submit a filing with FERC indicating its intent to apply the MOPR and will do so pending FERC approval. In practice, very few state energy policies would fall into this new category, particularly since any such “conditioning” likely would already be preempted under federal law, consistent with the Supreme Court’s Hughes decision.1 With regard to the possible exercise of BSMP, PJM will make its own determination whether a sell offer constitutes an exercise of BSMP, though PJM may elevate any such concern to FERC. PJM may request additional documentation from market participants if PJM suspects the potential for BSMP.2 

A summary of the PJM proposal is available here. The FERC filing is expected later this month.


1 See Hughes v. Talen Energy Mktg., LLC, 577 U.S. 1117 (2016). PJM’s proposal makes clear that state subsidies will not be deemed Conditioned State Support so long as they do not condition such support on clearing in a PJM auction.

2 PJM’s proposal notes that PJM may suspect BSMP if a seller intends to offer a resource that PJM believes is uneconomic in such a way that will lower the clearing price in an area where the seller has a “net short” position (i.e., the seller is buying more capacity than it is selling).

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2025

On March 5, 2025, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) approved Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC’s (GPLNG) request to extend a deadline to begin exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminal facility currently under construction in Sabine Pass, Texas for 18 months, from September 30, 2025, to March 31, 2027 (the Order). The Order amends GPLNG’s two existing long-term orders authorizing the export of domestically produced LNG to countries with which the United States does and does not have free trade agreements (FTA).1  The Order does not amend the authorizations’ end date, which remains December 31, 2050. Under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), the DOE may authorize exports to non-FTA countries following completion of a “public interest” review, whereas exports to FTA countries are deemed to be in the public interest and the DOE is directed to issue authorizations without modification or delay.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 4, 2025

Join projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat at Infocast’s Solar & Wind, where he will moderate the “Tax Equity Market Dynamics” panel.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 13, 2025

Oil & gas companies continue to identify and capitalize on opportunities related to the deployment of new energy technologies, with their approaches broadly maturing and coalescing around maximizing synergies, leveraging available subsidies and responding to regulatory drivers.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 11, 2025

On January 30, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) approved a Stipulation and Consent Agreement (Agreement) between the Office of Enforcement (OE) and Stronghold Digital Mining Inc. (Stronghold) resolving an investigation into whether Stronghold had violated the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) tariff and Commission regulations by limiting the quantity of energy made available to the market to serve a co-located Bitcoin mining operation.1 This order appears to be the first instance of a public enforcement action involving co-located load and generation and comes at a time when both FERC and market operators2 are scrutinizing the treatment of co-located load due to the rapid increase in demand associated with data center development.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 5, 2025

2024 was about post-consolidation deal flow and a steady uptick in activity across the oil & gas market. This year, mergers & acquisitions (M&A) activity looks set to take on a different tone as major consolidation plays bed down.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 30, 2025

The oil & gas industry is experiencing a capital resurgence, driven by stabilizing interest rates and renewed attention from institutional investors. Private equity is leading the charge with private credit filling the void in traditional energy finance and hybrid capital instruments gaining in popularity. Family offices are also playing a crucial role, providing long-term, flexible investments.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 23, 2025

Under a second Trump presidency, the U.S. is expected to consider reversal of many of the Biden administration’s climate and environmental policies, in addition to a markedly different approach to trade policy and oil & gas regulation. This includes expanding oil & gas development on public lands and offshore, lifting the pause on liquified natural gas (LNG) exports to non-Free Trade Agreement countries and repealing the methane fee.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 15, 2025

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Drilling Down: What Oil & Gas Companies Can Expect from Federal Agencies During Trump’s Second Administration.”

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.