Recent Developments in Singapore Green Energy Transition

Jan 4, 2023

Reading Time : 6 min

Article 6 Implementation Partnership

Singapore joined the Article 6 Implementation Partnership as a member country at the 27th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP27) in Egypt, which aims to foster the trade of carbon credits and thereby advance the implementation of carbon markets around the world through coordination of international capacity-building efforts.2

Article 6 of the Paris Agreement allows countries to voluntarily cooperate with each other to achieve emission reduction targets set out in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) via transfer of carbon credits between countries. The new Article 6 Implementation Partnership launched by Japan’s Ministry of the Environment during the COP27 conference will serve as an information platform for implantation of Article 6 and provide the support required to pilot Article 6 initiatives.3 At the time of launch of the partnership, 40 countries and 23 institutions have pledged to participate, and the partnership membership is expected to further grow in the future.4

As we highlighted in “Singapore: COP26 and Creating a Center for Carbon Trading”, Singapore has been taking steps to establish itself as a carbon services and trading hub. Its participation in the Article 6 Implementation Partnership is one of such steps. As greater clarity on cross-border carbon market mechanisms will flow from implementation of the rules set by Article 6, this will in turn lead to an increase in demand for associated services (such as carbon financing and trading, verification of carbon credits, legal services and carbon credit risk management), which are all areas that Singapore has been keen to foster and promote.

Singapore’s contribution to “the development of baseline methodologies for carbon markets and the promotion of the use of transparency tools and national frameworks for carbon markets”5 as a member of the Article 6 Implementation Partnership reflects its continued commitment to contribute to global greenhouse gas emission reductions, and we expect that Singapore will continue to play a vital role in supporting Article 6 implementation and facilitating international cooperation and partnership for carbon markets.

Singapore’s Bilateral Efforts

In addition to serving as a strong supporter of multilateral approaches to the green energy transition, Singapore has also pursued bilateral efforts such as:

  • Singapore-Australia Green Economy Agreement

Singapore and Australia signed the Singapore-Australia Green Economy Agreement on 18 October 2022. The agreement is considered “a first-of-its-kind agreement and pathfinder for rules and standards in advancing trade and environmental sustainability”6, and both countries seek to closely cooperate in the following seven areas: (i) trade and investment; (ii) standards and conformance; (iii) green and transition finance; (iv) carbon markets; (v) clean energy, decarbonisation and technology; (vi) skills and capabilities; and (vii) business engagements and partnerships.

By reducing barriers to cross-border trade in clean energy and promoting business engagements in trade and investment in green sectors, the bilateral agreement is expected to catalyse economic growth and job creation in green sectors, as well as promote decarbonisation and support both countries’ green economy transition.7

Although it is an agreement between two countries, market participants are eagerly tracking its implementation and waiting to see whether the Singapore-Australia Green Economy Agreement will create a positive ripple effect across the Asia-Pacific region and beyond and serve as a stepping stone to greater regional cooperation in addressing the global challenges of climate change and promoting energy transition to clean energy sources.

  • Singapore-Ghana Implementation Agreement on Carbon Credits Cooperation

Singapore and Ghana have substantively concluded negotiations on an Implementation Agreement on carbon credits cooperation, which is expected to be formally signed in early 2023.8 Once the Implementation Agreement becomes operational and the bilateral transfer of carbon credits commences, companies in Singapore will be allowed to purchase carbon credits from emission-reduction projects in Ghana to partially offset their carbon tax liabilities under Singapore’s carbon tax.

As noted above, Singapore is taking a leading role in terms of supporting Article 6 implementation, and the progress made with the Implementation Agreement with Ghana underscores Singapore’s leadership in establishing bilateral agreements for cooperation under Article 6.

  • Singapore’s Memoranda of Understanding for Collaboration under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement with Papua New Guinea and Peru

Singapore also signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Papua New Guinea on 14 November 20229 and another MOU with Peru on 18 November 2022 to collaborate on carbon markets.10 Under each of the MOUs, Singapore will further discuss with Papua New Guinea and Peru, respectively, to work towards a legally binding agreement that sets out a bilateral framework to permit generation and sharing of carbon credits and help Singapore and its partner countries achieve targets set out in their respective NDCs. We expect that Singapore’s active bilateral discussions with countries such as Papua New Guinea and Peru can also help other countries in the Asia-Pacific region develop capacity, readiness and awareness on using Article 6 and participating in international carbon markets.

Climate Action Data Trust

As a part of its efforts to contribute to development of carbon markets, Singapore along with the World Bank and the International Emissions Trading Association launched the Climate Action Data Trust (CAD Trust) at the Asia Climate Summit 2022 on 7 December 2022. The CAD Trust will serve as a global platform that provides a decentralised record of data from major carbon credit registries including Verra and Gold Standard, and it is expected to enhance transparency and confidence in carbon markets by addressing issues such as double-counting which is an inevitable byproduct of the fragmented nature of current carbon markets. Please refer to our previous article “Insights from the Asia Climate Summit 2022” for the more in-depth coverage of the Asia Climate Summit 2022 and the CAD Trust.


1 Please see, for example, “The Singapore Budget 2022 – A Continuing Commitment to Advancing Singapore’s Green Transition”, “Energy in ASEAN: Singapore and Hydrogen”, “COP26 and Article 6: Where Did Singapore End Up?”, “Singapore: COP26 and Creating a Center for Carbon Trading” and “Singapore’s Green Finance Drive”.

2 mti.gov.sg/Newsroom/Press-Releases/2022/11/Article-6-Implementation-Partnership-at-COP27.

3 https://www.nccs.gov.sg/media/press-releases/article-6-implementation-partnership-at-cop27/.

4 https://www.env.go.jp/en/press/press_00741.html.

5 https://www.nccs.gov.sg/media/press-releases/article-6-implementation-partnership-at-cop27/.

6 https://www.mti.gov.sg/-/media/MTI/Newsroom/Press-Releases/2022/10/MTI-MSE-Press-release-and-Factsheet-on-the-SAGEA.pdf.

7 https://www.mti.gov.sg/-/media/MTI/Newsroom/Press-Releases/2022/10/MTI-MSE-Press-release-and-Factsheet-on-the-SAGEA.pdf.

8 https://www.mse.gov.sg/resource-room/category/2022-11-15-media-release-singapore-and-ghana-implementation-agreement-article-6.

9 https://www.mse.gov.sg/resource-room/category/2022-11-14-media-release-singapore-and-papua-new-guinea-collaborate-advancing-climate-actions-and-ambition.

10 https://www.mse.gov.sg/resource-room/category/2022-11-18-media-release-singapore-and-peru-collaborate-on-carbon-markets-advance-climate-ambition 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

December 5, 2024

On November 27, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued Venture Global CP2 LNG, LLC,1 an order that sets aside, in part, the Commission’s prior authorization of the CP2 LNG Terminal and CP Express Pipeline Project (collectively, the CP2 Project) under sections 3 and 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA). In anticipation of future appellate challenges to its authorization of the CP2 Project, FERC ordered the initiation of a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) process under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to assess the CP2 Project’s contribution to cumulative air impacts for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5). Accordingly, FERC stated that it would not allow construction to commence on the CP2 Project’s proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal and related feed gas pipeline until the SEIS process concluded and a subsequent order was issued. Concurrent with its Venture Global order, FERC issued a projected schedule for the NEPA process that does not conclude until July 24, 2025. Construction on the CP2 Project had been expected to be imminent, with the project sponsor seeking a partial authorization to proceed with construction only hours prior to Venture Global’s issuance.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 5, 2024

On November 27, 2024, in Venture Global, CP2 LNG, LLC,1 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC or Commission) explicitly overruled precedent set in Northern Natural Gas Co.,2 a 2021 decision in which FERC made an affirmative finding that an interstate natural gas pipeline project it was certificating under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) would not make a “significant” contribution to global climate change. Northern Natural is the only FERC decision in which a so-called significance determination was made with respect to greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) arising from a FERC-regulated natural gas infrastructure project. In Venture Global, FERC rejected arguments that it needed to follow Northern Natural and assess the significance of GHG emissions in all NGA certificate proceedings to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA requires federal agencies, including FERC, that perform “major federal actions,” which include issuing NGA section 7 certificates, to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) if the action will “significantly affect[] the quality of the human environment.”3 FERC has been under pressure to fully explain why it has chosen not to apply Northern Natural’s significance analysis in subsequent cases, and that issue is currently before FERC on remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) in Healthy Gulf et al. v. FERC, which reviewed FERC’s approval of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal under NGA section 3.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 4, 2024

On November 21, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued Order No. 1920-A1 addressing requests for rehearing and clarification of FERC’s landmark final rule on transmission planning and cost allocation issued in May 2024. While the Commission largely affirmed the final rule, the order grants rehearing of some of the more controversial aspects of Order No. 1920.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

August 7, 2024

*Thank you to JaKell Larson, 2024 Akin Summer Associate, for her valuable collaboration on this article.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 31, 2024

Interstate oil, liquid and refined products pipelines regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) will soon be able to raise their transportation rates (provided they were set using FERC’s popular Index rate methodology) in the wake of a significant new decision by the District of Columbia Circuit (the D.C. Circuit) in Liquid Energy Pipeline Association v. FERC (LEPA).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 29, 2024

On Wednesday, July 24, 2024, the U.S. House of Representative Committee on Energy and Commerce held a Subcommittee on Energy, Climate, and Grid Security hearing to review the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request. Members of the Subcommittee had the opportunity to hear testimony from all five Commissioners, including FERC Chairman Willie Phillips and Commissioner Mark Christie, as well as the three recently confirmed commissioners, David Rosner, Lindsay See and Judy Chang. In addition to their prepared remarks, the five commissioners answered questions on FERC’s mandate to provide affordable and reliable electricity and natural gas services nationwide, while also ensuring it fulfills its primary mission of maintaining just and reasonable rates.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 29, 2024

On July 9, 2024, the U.S. Court of the Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) erred in ordering refunds for certain bilateral spot market transactions in the Western Energy Coordinating Council (WECC) region that exceeded the $1,000/megawatt-hour (MWh) “soft” price cap for such sales.1 Finding FERC failed to conduct a “Mobile-Sierra public-interest analysis” before “altering” those contracts by ordering refunds, the court vacated FERC’s orders and remanded the case to FERC for further proceedings.2

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 8, 2024

On June 28, 2024, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., which for 40 years required court deference to reasonable agency interpretations of federal statutes in certain circumstances, even when the reviewing court would read the statute differently. The Court ended “Chevron deference” and held that courts “must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority.” In doing so, the Court upended a longstanding principle of administrative law that is likely to make agency decisions more susceptible to challenge in the courts.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.